scholarly journals One-year outcome in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of lumboperitoneal shunt to ventriculoperitoneal shunt

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (6) ◽  
pp. 1483-1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakazu Miyajima ◽  
Hiroaki Kazui ◽  
Etsuro Mori ◽  
Masatsune Ishikawa
Keyword(s):  
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Minimal Invasiveness ◽  
Programmable Valves

OBJECTIVE Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is treated with cerebrospinal fluid shunting, and implantation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is the current standard treatment. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of VPSs and lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) for patients with iNPH. METHODS The authors conducted a prospective multicenter study of LPS use for patients with iNPH. Eighty-three patients with iNPH (age 60 to 85 years) who presented with ventriculomegaly and high-convexity and medial subarachnoid space tightness on MR images were recruited from 20 neurological or neurosurgical centers in Japan between March 1, 2010, and October 19, 2011. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 1 year after surgery, and the secondary outcome included scores on the iNPH grading scale (iNPHGS). A previously conducted VPS cohort study with the same inclusion criteria and primary and secondary end points was used as a historical control. RESULTS The proportion of patients who achieved a favorable outcome (i.e., improvement of at least 1 point in their mRS score) was 63% (95% CI 51%–73%) and was comparable to values reported with VPS implantation (69%, 95% CI 59%–78%). Using the iNPHGS, the 1-year improvement rate was 75% (95% CI 64%–84%) and was comparable to the rate found in the VPS study (77%, 95% CI 68%–84%). The proportion of patients experiencing serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-SAEs did not differ significantly between the groups at 1 year after surgery (SAEs: 19 [22%] of 87 LPS patients vs 15 [15%] of 100 VPS patients, p = 0.226; non-SAEs: 24 [27.6%] LPS patients vs 20 [20%] VPS patients, p = 0.223). However, shunt revisions were more common in LPS-treated patients than in VPS-treated patients (6 [7%] vs 1 [1%]). CONCLUSIONS The efficacy and safety rates for LPSs with programmable valves are comparable to those for VPSs for the treatment of patients with iNPH. Despite the relatively high shunt failure rate, an LPS can be the treatment of choice because of its minimal invasiveness and avoidance of brain injury.

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt in treating of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus—single-center study

2019 ◽  
Vol 162 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
David Krahulik ◽  
Miroslav Vaverka ◽  
Lumir Hrabalek ◽  
Martin Hampl ◽  
Matej Halaj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Center Study

Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Increases Midbrain Size: A Potential Mechanism for Gait Improvement

Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 847-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Mocco ◽  
Matthew I. Tomey ◽  
Ricardo J. Komotar ◽  
William J. Mack ◽  
Steven J. Frucht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Shunt Placement ◽  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting ◽  
The Mean

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is characterized by a classic clinical triad of symptoms, including dementia, urinary incontinence, and gait disturbance. Recent work has demonstrated that the maximal midbrain anteroposterior (AP) diameter is significantly smaller in patients with INPH than in healthy, age-matched controls. The current study was undertaken to determine the effect of ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement on midbrain dimensions in INPH patients. METHODS: Twelve consecutive INPH patients undergoing ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement with pre- and postoperative computed tomographic scans at the Columbia University Medical Center were enrolled. Each patient's pre- and postoperative maximum AP and left-to-right diameters of the midbrain at the pontomesencephalic junction were independently measured in a blinded fashion by two of the authors. The average value of each dimension was computed by calculating the mean values of the measurements of the two observers. RESULTS: Both the mean AP diameter (preoperative mean, 2.06 ± 0.04 cm; postoperative mean, 2.27 ± 0.05; P = 0.0007) and left-to-right diameter (preoperative mean, 2.80 ± 0.07; postoperative mean, 3.03 ± 0.08; P = 0.0029) increased from pre- to postoperative imaging. The approximate cross-sectional area determined as the product of AP and left-to-right diameters also increased from pre- to postoperative images (preoperative mean, 5.79 ± 0.22 cm2; postoperative mean, 6.90 ± 0.25 cm2; P = 0.00049). CONCLUSION: This study provides supportive evidence that midbrain cytoarchitecture may play a role in the pathophysiology and post-ventriculoperitoneal shunt gait improvement of INPH patients.

scholarly journals Predictors of favorable response to implanted of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Mario Emiliano Ricciardi ◽  
Ismael Calandri ◽  
Lucas Alessandro ◽  
Mauricio Farez ◽  
Juan Villalonga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Clinical Factors ◽  
A Prospective Study

Introduction: The indication of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is discussed in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), due to the heterogeneity of the response to treatment and the risks involved in neurosurgery. Objective: To search for clinical factors and complementary studies in order to determine predictors of a favorable response to the VPS placement in patients with iNPH. Methodology: A retrospective study of patients with probable iNPH (according to international guidelines) treated with VPS assisted in a neurological clinic from January 2014 to January 2017 was conducted. A univariate statisticalanalysis of the variables considered as possible prognostic factors was performed. Results: 58 patients were included. Women presented 3.68 times more chances of improvement after the VPS (p=0.019). Good response to the gait test was associated with better response to the VPS (p=0.024). Conclusions: Female sex and good response to the gait test could be considered as predictors of a favorable response to the VPS placement in patients with iNPH. A prospective study is necessary to achieve a homogeneous diagnostic evaluation and a more extensive longitudinal follow-up to evaluate the clinical evolution in this group of patients.

scholarly journals Timed up and go test at tap test and shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeki Yamada ◽  
Masatsune Ishikawa ◽  
Masakazu Miyajima ◽  
Madoka Nakajima ◽  
Masamichi Atsuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Shunt Surgery ◽  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Tap Test ◽  
Lumboperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Shunt Implantation ◽  
Percent Improvement

AbstractBackground:The 3-meter Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is a reliable quantitative test for assessment of gait and balance. We aimed to establish an optimal threshold of TUG at the tap test for predicting outcomes 12 months after shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).Methods:The TUG was measured in a total of 151 patients with possible iNPH before and after a tap test and 12 months after shunt surgery. Among them, 81 patients underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation (SINPHONI) and 70 underwent lumboperitoneal shunt implantation (SINPHONI-2). The areas under the curve (AUCs), sensitivities, and specificities for predicting shunt effectiveness were assessed.Results:The simple differences of time on TUG at the tap test were significantly more accurate for predicting shunt effectiveness than percent improvement of time. The highest AUC for the synchronized moving cutoff point of TUG time was 0.81 (sensitivity 81.0%; specificity 81.6%) at the threshold of 5 seconds in the SINPHONI-2. For predicting improvements of ≥10 seconds 12 months after lumboperitoneal shunt implantation, the AUC was 0.90, and the sensitivity and specificity at the threshold of 5.6 seconds were 83.3% and 81.0%. Only for patients with a <5-second improvement at the tap test, ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation conveyed significantly better improvements in TUG time 12 months after surgery than lumboperitoneal shunt implantation.Conclusions:An improvement of 5 seconds was a useful threshold of TUG time at the tap test for predicting a ≥10-second improvement 12 months after shunt surgery, rather than the percent improvement of TUG time.

scholarly journals Chronic subdural hematoma treatment with adjustment of programmable valve in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patient: a case report

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (02) ◽  
pp. 139-141
Author(s):  
Matheus Fernandes de Oliveira ◽  
Rodolfo Casimiro Reis ◽  
Fernando Campos Gomes Pinto ◽  
José Marcus Rotta
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Subdural Hematoma ◽  
Chronic Subdural Hematoma ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Benign Condition ◽  
Programmable Valve ◽  
Programmable Valves ◽  
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patient

AbstractChronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common entity in daily neurosurgical practice. It is considered a benign condition. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is characterized by gait disturbance, dementia and/or urinary incontinence added to dilation of ventricular system due to disturbance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation with normal CSF pressure. We describe an experience of a conservative treatment of subdural hematoma based in the physiopathology and ability to control the pressure in programmable valves. The adjustment of programmable valves in the treatment of INPH allow us the therapeutic control of hydrocephalus and an important tool to manage complications, especially overshunting and undershunting.

Predictors of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Revision in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

2016 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 76-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice L. Hung ◽  
Dane Moran ◽  
Sharif Vakili ◽  
Hugo Fialho ◽  
Eric W. Sankey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Shunt Revision

scholarly journals Outcomes and complications of different surgical treatments for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. 1024-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Giordan ◽  
Giorgio Palandri ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Mohammad Hassan Murad ◽  
Benjamin D. Elder
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Csf Diversion ◽  
Programmable Valves

OBJECTIVEDifferent CSF diversion procedures (ventriculoperitoneal, ventriculoatrial, and lumboperitoneal shunting) have been utilized for the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. More recently, endoscopic third ventriculostomy has been suggested as a reasonable alternative in some studies. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess overall rates of favorable outcomes and adverse events for each of these treatments. An additional objective was to determine the outcomes and complication rates in relation to the type of valve utilized (fixed vs programmable).METHODSMultiple databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus) were searched for studies involving patients with idiopathic ventriculomegaly, no secondary cause of hydrocephalus, opening pressure < 25 mm Hg on high-volume tap or drainage trial, and age > 60 years. Outcomes included the proportion of patients who showed improvement in gait, cognition, and bladder function. Adverse events considered in the analysis included postoperative ischemic/hemorrhagic complications, subdural fluid collections, seizures, need for revision surgery, and infection.RESULTSA total of 33 studies, encompassing 2461 patients, were identified. More than 75% of patients experienced improvement after shunting, without significant differences among the different techniques utilized. Overall, gait improvement was observed in 75% of patients, cognitive function improvement in more than 60%, and improvement of incontinence in 55%. Adjustable valves were associated with a reduction in revisions (12% vs 32%) and subdural collections (9% vs 22%) as compared to fixed valves.CONCLUSIONSOutcomes did not differ significantly among different CSF diversion techniques, and overall improvement was reported in more than 75% of patients. The use of programmable valves decreased the incidence of revision surgery and of subdural collections after surgery, potentially justifying the higher initial cost associated with these valves.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document