scholarly journals A brief history of endoscopic spine surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. E2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert E. Telfeian ◽  
Anand Veeravagu ◽  
Adetokunbo A. Oyelese ◽  
Ziya L. Gokaslan

Few neurosurgeons practicing today have had training in the field of endoscopic spine surgery during residency or fellowship. Nevertheless, over the past 40 years individual spine surgeons from around the world have worked to create a subfield of minimally invasive spine surgery that takes the point of visualization away from the surgeon's eye or the lens of a microscope and puts it directly at the point of spine pathology. What follows is an attempt to describe the story of how endoscopic spine surgery developed and to credit some of those who have been the biggest contributors to its development.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Snyder ◽  
John O'Toole ◽  
Kurt M. Eichholz ◽  
Mick J. Perez-Cruet ◽  
Richard Fessler

Minimally invasive spine surgery has its roots in the mid-twentieth century with a few surgeons and a few techniques, but it has now developed into a large field of progressive spinal surgery. A wide range of techniques are now called “minimally invasive,” and case reports are submitted constantly with new “minimally invasive” approaches to spinal pathology. As minimally invasive spine surgery has become more mainstream over the past ten years, in this paper we discuss its history and development.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (21;1) ◽  
pp. E145-E149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert E. Telfeian

Background: Transforaminal lumbar endoscopic discectomy is a minimally invasive spine surgery procedure performed principally for the treatment of lumbar herniated discs. Endoscopic spine surgeons around the world have noted how far patients will travel to undergo this minimally invasive spine surgery, but the actual distance patients travel has never been investigated. Objective: We present here our analysis of how far patients will travel for endoscopic spine surgery by studying the referral patterns of patients to 3 centers in 3 different countries. Study Design: Retrospective chart review of de-identified patient data was performed to analyze the distance patients travel for spine surgery. Methods: Patient demographic data was analyzed for patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar endoscopic discectomy procedures over the same 8 month period in 2015 at centers in the United States (U.S.), Netherlands, and Germany. Results: Travel distances for patients were determined for 327 patients. The average distance traveled for the U.S. center was 91 miles, the Dutch center was 287 miles, and the German center was 103 miles. For the U.S. center 16% of patients traveled out of state for surgery and for the European centers combined, 4% of patients traveled out of the country for surgery. Limitations: The period of data analyzed was less than one year and the data collected was analyzed retrospectively. Conclusions: Quality metrics in health care tend to be focused on how health care is delivered. Another health care metric that focuses more on what patients desire is presented here: how far patients will travel for innovative spine care. Key words: Endoscopic spine surgery, transforaminal, minimally invasive, travel, lumbar disc herniation


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jang W. Yoon ◽  
Michael Y. Wang

The field of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has rapidly evolved over the past 3 decades. This review follows the evolution of techniques and principles that have led to significant advances in the field. While still representing only a subset of spine surgeries, MISS’s goals of reducing soft-tissue trauma and mitigating the morbidity of surgery are being realized, translating into more rapid recovery, lower infection rates, and higher cost savings. Future advances in technology and techniques can be anticipated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 694-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiwon Park ◽  
Dae-Woong Ham ◽  
Byung-Taek Kwon ◽  
Sang-Min Park ◽  
Ho-Joong Kim ◽  
...  

<p>Over the past few decades, interest in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has increased tremendously due to its core principle of minimizing approach-related injury while providing outcomes similar to traditional open spine procedures. With technical and technological advancements, MISS has expanded its utility not only to simple spinal stenosis, but also to complex spinal pathologies such as metastasis, trauma, or adult spinal deformity. In this article, we review the techniques and technology in MISS and discuss the indications, benefits, and limitations of MISS.</p>


Neurosurgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 51 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. S2-1-S2-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivakumar Jaikumar ◽  
Daniel H. Kim ◽  
Andrew C. Kam

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Spetzger ◽  
Andrej Von Schilling ◽  
Gerd Winkler ◽  
Jürgen Wahrburg ◽  
Alexander König

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document