scholarly journals Trans sodium crocetinate with temozolomide and radiation therapy for glioblastoma multiforme

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 460-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Gainer ◽  
Jason P. Sheehan ◽  
James M. Larner ◽  
David R. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

OBJECTIVE A new drug, trans sodium crocetinate (TSC), has been developed to enhance the delivery of oxygen to hypoxic tissues. Cancerous tumors, such as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are very hypoxic, and it has been suggested that radiation therapy (RT) is more beneficial if tumors are better oxygenated. A Phase I/II clinical trial was conducted to determine the effect of adding TSC to RT sessions. METHODS An open, single-arm clinical trial incorporating the standard of care (SOC) for GBM was conducted at 18 clinical sites. There were 6 weeks of RT consisting of 2 Gy/day for 5 days/week, beginning after an initial resection or stereotactic biopsy to confirm GBM. Temozolomide (TMZ), 75 mg/m2, was given before each RT session. The TSC, 0.25 mg/kg, was intravenously administered around 45 minutes before an RT session 3 days/week, usually on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. A Phase I run-in period included 2 cohorts. The first cohort contained 3 patients who were given a half dose of the intravenous TSC (that is, 0.25 mg/kg, 3 times per week for only the first 3 weeks of RT). After a Safety Monitoring Committee (SMC) had verified that no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) had occurred, a second cohort of 6 patients was given the same dosage of TSC but for the full 6 weeks of RT. After the SMC verified that no DLTs had occurred, Phase II began, with the administration of the full 18 doses of TSC. Fifty additional patients were enrolled during Phase II. Following the completion of RT, the patients rested for a month. After that, SOC TMZ chemotherapy (150–200 mg/m2) was administered for 5 days of the 1st week of 6 monthly cycles. No TSC was administered during this chemotherapy phase or later in the trial. Any other follow-up therapies were administered at the discretion of the individual investigators. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 36% of the full-dose TSC patients were alive at 2 years, compared with historical survival values ranging from 27% to 30% for the SOC. Survival for the biopsy-only subset of patients was 40%, as compared with 42.9% for those patients having a complete resection before treatment. In addition, 2 of the 3 Phase I, Cohort 1 patients survived at 2 years. Contrast MRI data suggested that considerable pseudoprogression had occurred. Both Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires indicated that a good quality of life existed for most patients throughout the trial. No serious adverse events occurring in the trial were attributed to TSC. CONCLUSIONS This trial contained a single arm consisting of 59 patients. The results strongly suggested that adding TSC during RT is beneficial for the treatment of GBM. Trans sodium crocetinate offers a novel, easily implemented way to combat hypoxia in tumor tissue. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01465347 (clinicaltrials.gov)

Phase II clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: BIBABRAX study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4615-4615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Feliu Batlle ◽  
Monica Jorge Fernandez ◽  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Bartomeu Massuti ◽  
Ana Albero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Ecog Ps

4615 Background: FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P+G) are the standard of care in the first-line treatment of mPC patients (pt) with good performance status. However, no standards of care exist for elderly ( > 70 years) pt as they are usually excluded in clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate whether the clinical benefit of nab-P+G could be extended to elderly pt with mPC. Methods: This was an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial, to assess the efficacy and safety of Nab-P+G in elderly pt (≥ 70 years) with ECOG PS 0–1 and untreated unresectable locally advanced or metastatic PC. Pt received four-week cycles of intravenous (i.v.) nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2, followed by i.v. gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2, on days 1, 8 and 15, until disease progression. Efficacy was evaluated according RECIST v 1.1 criteria and safety according NCI-CTCAE v 4.0 criteria. Results: Eighty pt were enrolled in the study. Median age was 74.6 years (range 70-87.9), 57.5% were men, 71% had ECOG PS 1 and 86% metastatic disease. 16.3% of patients had a history of prior tumor surgical resection, 12.5% received chemotherapy and 3.8% radiotherapy. Primary tumor was located in head (32.5%), tail (25.0%) and body (22.5%). Nab-P and G was reduced in 49% and 41% of pt respectively. 15 pt definitely interrupt study treatment due to toxicity: neurotoxicity (7), asthenia (5), neutropenia (1), leukocytosis (1) and hepatotoxicity (1). Time until definite deterioration (reduction ≥10 points as compared to baseline in EORTC-QLQ C30) was 1.6 months and deterioration-free rate at 3 months was 54.3%. Overall response rate was 13.8%, clinical benefit rate 67.5%, median PFS 7.2 months and median OS 9.2 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were asthenia (60.0%), diarrhea (40.0%), neutropenia (33.8%), hair loss (28.8%), thrombocytopenia (26.3%), and nausea (23.8%). Only asthenia and neutropenia presented a relatively high incidence of grade 3 and 4 toxicities (21.3%). At least 1 SAE was reported in 55% of pt. Conclusions: BIBABRAX study confirms the clinical benefit of nab-P+G in an elderly population with mPC, in terms of survival, clinical response and tolerance, therefore it could be considered a treatment option for elderly patients. However, it was unable to demonstrate the preplanned benefit on the quality of life. Further research is needed on treatment strategies that could reduce deterioration of the quality of life in these pt. Clinical trial information: NCT02391662 .

Phase I/II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Combination With Gemcitabine in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer and an ECOG Performance Status of 2

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Roberto Pazo-Cid ◽  
Carmen Guillén-Ponce ◽  
Rafael López ◽  
Ruth Vera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Actuarial Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients

Purpose Gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (NAB) paclitaxel (GA) significantly improved survival compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and a Karnofsky performance status (PS) of 70% or greater. Because of the low number of patients with reduced PS, the efficacy of this regimen in fragile patients remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different GA dosing regimens in patients with a poor PS. Patients and Methods In the phase I part of this study, patients were randomly assigned to one of the following four parallel GA treatment arms (six patients per arm): a biweekly schedule of NAB-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2 [arm A] or 125 mg/m2 [arm C]) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 or a standard schedule of 3 weeks on and 1 week off of NAB-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 [arm B] or 125 mg/m2 [arm D]) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. The two regimens with the better tolerability profile on the basis of predefined criteria were evaluated in the phase II part of the study, the primary end point of which was 6-month actuarial survival. Results Arms B and D were selected for the phase II part of the study. A total of 221 patients (111 patients in arm B and 110 patients in arm D) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics including median age (71 and 68 years in arms B and D, respectively), sex (51% and 55% men in arms B and D, respectively), and metastatic disease (88% and 84% in arms B and D, respectively) were comparable between arms. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities in arms B and D were anemia (12% and 7%, respectively), neutropenia (32% and 30%, respectively), thrombocytopenia (7% and 11%, respectively), asthenia (14% and 16%, respectively), and neurotoxicity (11% and 16%, respectively). In arms B and D, there were no significant differences in response rate (24% and 28%, respectively), median progression-free survival (5.7 and 6.7 months, respectively), and 6-month overall survival (63% and 69%, respectively). Conclusion NAB-paclitaxel administered at either 100 and 125 mg/m2 in combination with gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days is well tolerated and results in acceptable safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and a poor PS.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for complicated bone metastases in patients with poor performance status: a phase II international trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio F. Silva ◽  
Gustavo N. Marta ◽  
Felipe P.C. Lisboa ◽  
Guilherme Watte ◽  
Fabio Trippa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Life Questionnaire

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy (16 Gy in 2 fractions, 1 week apart) in patients with complicated bone metastases and poor performance status. Methods: A prospective single-arm phase II clinical trial was conducted from July 2014 to May 2016. The primary endpoint was pain response as defined in the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints. Secondary endpoints included quality of life as measured by quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) PAL-15 and QLQ-BM22 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer guidelines, pain flare, adverse events, re-irradiation, and skeletal complications. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled. There were 23 men with a median age of 58 years (range 26-86). Of the 50 patients, 38 had an extraosseous soft tissue component, 18 needed postsurgical radiation, 3 had neuropathic pain, and 3 had an impending fracture in a weight-bearing bone. At 2 months, 33 patients were alive (66%). Four (12.5%) had a complete response and 12 (37.5%) had a partial response. A statistically significant improvement was seen in the functional interference (p = 0.01) and psychosocial aspects (p = 0.03) of the BM22. No patient had spinal cord compression. One patient required surgery for pathologic fracture, and another re-irradiation. Conclusions: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (16 Gy in 2 fractions of 8 Gy 1 week apart) achieved satisfactory pain relief and safety results in patients with complicated bone metastases and poor performance status.

Quality of life assessment in patients above 60, below 50 years of age during and after curative radiotherapy in head and neck cancers

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5552-5552 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Turaka ◽  
B. K. Mohanti ◽  
S. Chander ◽  
S. V. Deo ◽  
R. Jena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Curative Radiotherapy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

5552 Background: To evaluate the Quality of life in patients above 60 and below 50 years during and after curative radiotherapy in head and neck cancers. Methods: Head and Neck cancer patients who are to undergo curative radiotherapy (RT) were divided into two groups, 49 patients (Group A,above 60 years) and 40 patients (Group B,below 50). Quality of life assessment was done using EORTC QLQ C-30 version-2 at 4 phases;Pretreatment-Phase I,during RT-Phase II,1-month post RT-Phase III and 6 months post RT-Phase IV.Statistical analysis was done with mean scores using ’t’ test. Results: Physical functioning (PF)scores in both groups were highest in phase I (69.4;77.5, p < 0.035) and lowest in phase II (40; 50, p < 0.008) and the difference was statistically significant. Although PF scores declined in both groups in phase II, overall PF score remained higher in group B than in group A in all phases.Role functioning score remained low in both groups and the difference were not statistically significant at all phases. Emotional functioning score was highest in phase I (68.37; 69.15), but declined as treatment progressed, consequent to depression.The values improved over time, restored to near pretreatment values at phase IV. Cognitive functioning scores in both groups was also highest in phase I (70.07; 79.17). Social functioning of both groups declined during RT (42.52; 45)compared to pre RT values (73.47; 77.09). The mean Global Health Status score was higher in group B compared to group A at all phases, yet there was no statistical significance.The scores declined during RT (66.87 vs 35.62 & 64.79 vs 34.01), improved overtime but did not reach pre RT scores.The symptom scores were all higher for elderly patients compared with younger patients at all phases, implying elderly patients experienced more symptoms, with greater experience of symptoms during RT. Conclusions: Quality of Life of elderly patients was lower compared to younger patients at phase II in terms of physical functioning, social and emotional functioning. Global Health Status score was higher for younger patients than elderly at all phases, and declined in phase II. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Quality of life in patients with advanced gastroesophageal (GE) adenocarcinoma treated with modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (mDCF).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
E. C. Smyth ◽  
Y. Y. Janjigian ◽  
E. Robinson ◽  
E. C. Sheehy ◽  
I. Karpenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Score Change ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Significant Toxicity

92 Background: Although DCF is a standard first line chemotherapy option for advanced GE adenocarcinoma, the regimen is associated with significant toxicity. Even so, time to detriment in quality of life (QoL) was significantly better with parent DCF than CF (Ajani, JCO 2007). Modified DCF (mDCF) has demonstrated less toxicity than parent DCF without compromising efficacy in two phase II studies (Shah, GI ASCO 2010; Kelsen, ASCO 2009). We report the quality of life (QoL) over time of patients receiving mDCF on these two clinical trials. Methods: Patients (pts) treated on two protocols utilizing the mDCF regimen, either alone or in combination with bevacizumab, were administered standard EORTC QoL questionnaires (QLC –C30 version 3), at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months (m). Chemotherapy and QoL assessment continued until disease progression. Mean score change from baseline was assessed using Wilcoxon test. Results: 94 eligible pts have been enrolled on both studies; QoL questionnaires are available on 87 pts. 74% are male, median age 58 years (range 28-78), with baseline Karnofsky performance status of 80% (range 70-100). Patient compliance with QoL assessment was high at baseline but diminished with time; 89% of pts completed the questionnaire at baseline and 41% at 12m. There was no significant detriment in EORTC QOL scores (including global health, physical and social functioning and fatigue) during treatment with mDCF (Table). Conclusions: In patients with advanced GE cancer, we observed no detriment in QoL scores in patients receiving mDCF therapy. Specifically, physical and social functioning, fatigue, appetite, and global heath QoL scores were maintained at baseline levels during the first 6 months of therapy, and appear to improve in patients who remained on protocol therapy during the next 6 months of treatment. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document