Asleep deep brain stimulation with intraoperative magnetic resonance guidance: a single-institution experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
David J. Segar ◽  
Nalini Tata ◽  
Maya Harary ◽  
Michael T. Hayes ◽  
G. Rees Cosgrove

OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is traditionally performed on an awake patient with intraoperative recordings and test stimulation. DBS performed under general anesthesia with intraoperative MRI (iMRI) has demonstrated high target accuracy, reduced operative time, direct confirmation of target placement, and the ability to place electrodes without cessation of medications. The authors describe their initial experience with using iMRI to perform asleep DBS and discuss the procedural and radiological outcomes of this procedure. METHODS All DBS electrodes were implanted under general anesthesia by a single surgeon by using a neuronavigation system with 3-T iMRI guidance. Clinical outcomes, operative duration, complications, and accuracy were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS In total, 103 patients treated from 2015 to 2019 were included, and all but 1 patient underwent bilateral implantation. Indications included Parkinson’s disease (PD) (65% of patients), essential tremor (ET) (29%), dystonia (5%), and refractory epilepsy (1%). Targets included the globus pallidus pars internus (12.62% of patients), subthalamic nucleus (56.31%), ventral intermedius nucleus of the thalamus (30%), and anterior nucleus of the thalamus (1%). Technically accurate lead placement (radial error ≤ 1 mm) was obtained for 98% of leads, with a mean (95% CI) radial error of 0.50 (0.46–0.54) mm; all leads were placed with a single pass. Predicted radial error was an excellent predictor of real radial error, underestimating real error by only a mean (95% CI) of 0.16 (0.12–0.20) mm. Accuracy remained high irrespective of surgeon experience, but procedure time decreased significantly with increasing institutional and surgeon experience (p = 0.007), with a mean procedure duration of 3.65 hours. Complications included 1 case of intracranial hemorrhage (asymptomatic) and 1 case of venous infarction (symptomatic), and 2 patients had infection at the internal pulse generator site. The mean ± SD voltage was 2.92 ± 0.83 V bilaterally at 1-year follow-up. Analysis of long-term clinical efficacy demonstrated consistent postoperative improvement in clinical symptoms, as well as decreased drug doses across all indications and follow-up time points, including mean decrease in levodopa-equivalent daily dose by 53.57% (p < 0.0001) in PD patients and mean decrease in primidone dose by 61.33% (p < 0.032) in ET patients at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS A total of 205 leads were placed in 103 patients by a single surgeon under iMRI guidance with few operative complications. Operative time trended downward with increasing institutional experience, and technical accuracy of radiographic lead placement was consistently high. Asleep DBS implantation with iMRI appears to be a safe and effective alternative to standard awake procedures.

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir H Faraji ◽  
Vasileios Kokkinos ◽  
James C Sweat ◽  
Robert M Richardson

Abstract INTRODUCTION Modern robotic-assisted stereotaxy has been increasingly adopted for neurosurgical procedures. Accuracy and precision are paramount in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, and robotic control may improve surgical outcomes and precision. We developed 2 frame-based workflows for DBS: (1) without microelectrode recordings and (2) with microelectrode recordings and the possibility for intraoperative electrocorticography, and reported on lead placement accuracy and complications. METHODS A consecutive single-surgeon cohort of 20 patients underwent stage 1 DBS (targets included VIM, STN, GPi) with frame-based ROSA-Brain robotic assistance. Radial error accuracy was retrospectively established with two blinded raters comparing pre- and postoperative DBS lead trajectories. Total operative case time was obtained from nursing documentation and postoperative complications were documented. RESULTS A systematic method for ROSA-Brain co-registration was developed to allow for DBS: (1) without microelectrode recordings and (2) with microelectrode recordings and the possibility for intraoperative electrocorticography. The overall radial error for lead placement across all 20 patients was 1.14+/−0.11 mm. A significant difference (P = .006) existed between the radial error of the first 10 patients (1.46+/−0.19 mm) as compared to the second 10 patients (0.86+/−0.09 mm). Overall, the total OR case time is at par with previously reported robotic-assisted DBS cases. CONCLUSION Robotic-assisted DBS surgery, such as with the ROSA-Brain platform, has the potential to increase precision and reduce the human error associated with multiple measurements using traditional frame-based surgery without significantly impacting operating room workflow.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir H Faraji ◽  
Vasileios Kokkinos ◽  
James C Sweat ◽  
Donald J Crammond ◽  
R Mark Richardson

Abstract BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted stereotaxy has been increasingly adopted for lead implantation in stereoelectroencephalography based on its efficiency, accuracy, and precision. Despite initially being developed for use in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, adoption for this indication has not been widespread. OBJECTIVE To describe a recent robotic-assisted stereotaxy experience and workflow for DBS lead implantation in awake patients with and without microelectrode recording (MER), including considerations for intraoperative research using electrocorticography (ECoG). METHODS A retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral DBS lead implantation using robotic-assisted stereotaxy was performed. Radial error was determined by comparing the preoperative target with the DBS lead position in the targeting plane on postoperative computed tomography. Information regarding any postoperative complications was obtained by chart review. RESULTS A novel method for robot coregistration was developed. We describe a standard workflow that allows for MER and/or ECoG research, and a streamlined workflow for cases in which MER is not required. The overall radial error for lead placement across all 20 patients was 1.14 ± 0.11 mm. A significant difference (P = .006) existed between the radial error of the first 10 patients (1.46 ± 0.19 mm) as compared with the second 10 patients (0.86 ± 0.09 mm). No complications were encountered. CONCLUSION Robotic-assisted stereotaxy has the potential to increase precision and reduce human error, compared to traditional frame-based DBS surgery, without negatively impacting patient safety or the ability to perform awake neurophysiology research.


2020 ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Anhar Hassan

A 79-year-old woman with medication-refractory disabling orthostatic tremor (OT) of 15 years’ duration was referred for deep brain stimulation (DBS). She reported leg tremor within seconds of standing that spread to the trunk and upper limbs within 30 seconds, requiring her to sit down. She carried a stool everywhere to compensate for inability to stand. She had failed several medications, including clonazepam. Clinical exam showed visible and palpable leg tremor within seconds of standing. Surface electrophysiology confirmed a 15- to 16-Hz tremor on standing that transmitted to the arms with load-bearing. She was approved for bilateral ventral intermediate thalamic DBS. A microlesional effect was observed on standing up in the operating room following bilateral lead placement. Outpatient DBS programming resulted in further tremor suppression clinically, confirmed by movement electrophysiology with DBS turned off and on. At 3-year follow-up, the patient could stand for 10 to 15 minutes, with only minor shifts in stance, and no longer needed a stool. There was an observed difference in tremor severity and standing time with DBS turned on and off. This case adds to the growing body of literature on the benefit of bilateral thalamic DBS for medication-refractory OT. However, whether there is a more optimal DBS target is not yet known.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-538
Author(s):  
Catherine Moran ◽  
Nagaraja Sarangmat ◽  
Carter S Gerard ◽  
Neil Barua ◽  
Reiko Ashida ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Robotics in neurosurgery has demonstrated widening indications and rapid growth in recent years. Robotic precision and reproducibility are especially pertinent to the field of functional neurosurgery. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires accurate placement of electrodes in order to maximize efficacy and minimize side effects. In addition, asleep techniques demand clear target visualization and immediate on-table verification of accuracy. OBJECTIVE To describe the surgical technique of asleep DBS surgery using the Neuro|MateTM Robot (Renishaw plc, Wotton-under-Edge, United Kingdom) and examine the accuracy of DBS lead placement in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for the treatment of movement disorders. METHODS A single-center retrospective review of 113 patients who underwent bilateral STN/Zona Incerta electrode placement was performed. Accuracy of implantation was assessed using 5 measurements, Euclidian distance, radial error, depth error, angular error, and shift error. RESULTS A total of 226 planned vs actual electrode placements were analyzed. The mean 3-dimensional vector error calculated for 226 trajectories was 0.78 +/− 0.37 mm. The mean radial displacement off planned trajectory was 0.6 +/− 0.33 mm. The mean depth error, angular error, and shift error was 0.4 +/− 0.35 mm, 0.4 degrees, and 0.3 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION This report details our institution's method for DBS lead placement in patients under general anaesthesia using anatomical targeting without microelectrode recordings or intraoperative test stimulation for the treatment of movement disorders. This is the largest reported dataset of accuracy results in DBS surgery performed asleep. This novel robot-assisted operative technique results in sub-millimeter accuracy in DBS electrode placement.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 738-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abilash Haridas ◽  
Michele Tagliati ◽  
Irene Osborn ◽  
Ioannis Isaias ◽  
Yakov Gologorsky ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the internal globus pallidus (GPi) has replaced ablative procedures for the treatment of primary generalized dystonia (PGD) because it is adjustable, reversible, and yields robust clinical improvement that appears to be long lasting. OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term responses to pallidal DBS of a consecutive series of 22 pediatric patients with PGD. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 22 consecutive PGD patients, ≤21 years of age treated by one DBS team over an 8-year period. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) was used to evaluate symptom severity and functional disability, pre- and post-operatively. Adverse events and medication changes were also noted. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 2 years (range, 1-8 years). All 22 patients reached 1-year follow-up; 14 reached 2 years, and 11 reached 3 years. The BFMDRS motor subscores were improved 84%, 93%, and 94% (median) at these time points. These motor responses were matched by equivalent improvements in function, and the response to DBS resulted in significant reductions in oral and intrathecal medication requirements after 12 and 24 months of stimulation. There were no hemorrhages or neurological complications related to surgery and no adverse effects from stimulation. Significant hardware-related complications were noted, in particular, infection (14%), which delayed clinical improvement. CONCLUSION: Pallidal DBS is a safe and effective treatment for PGD in patients &lt;21 years of age. The improvement appears durable. Improvement in device design should reduce hardware-related complications over time.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. E184-E188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thien Thien Lim ◽  
Hubert H. Fernandez ◽  
Scott Cooper ◽  
Kathryn Mary K. Wilson ◽  
Andre G. Machado

Abstract BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Chorea acanthocytosis is a progressive hereditary neurodegenerative disorder characterized by hyperkinetic movements, seizures, and acanthocytosis in the absence of any lipid abnormality. Medical treatment is typically limited and disappointing. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: We report on a 32-year-old patient with chorea acanthocytosis with a failed attempt at awake deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery due to intraoperative seizures and postoperative intracranial hematoma. He then underwent a second DBS operation, but under general anesthesia and with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging guidance. Marked improvement in his dystonia, chorea, and overall quality of life was noted 2 and 8 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: DBS surgery of the bilateral globus pallidus pars interna may be useful in controlling the hyperkinetic movements in neuroacanthocytosis. Because of the high propensity for seizures in this disorder, DBS performed under general anesthesia, with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging guidance, may allow successful implantation while maintaining accurate target localization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document