scholarly journals Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine

2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T. Foley ◽  
Sanjay K. Gupta ◽  
Jeff R. Justis ◽  
Michael C. Sherman
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Posterior Fixation ◽  
Insertion Device ◽  
Locking Mechanism ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Lumbar Pedicle

Object Standard techniques for lumbar pedicle screw fixation involve open exposures and extensive muscle dissection. The purpose of this study was to report the initial clinical experience with a novel device for percutaneous posterior fixation of the lumbar spine. Methods An existing multiaxial lumbar pedicle screw system was modified so that screws could be placed percutaneously by using an extension sleeve that would allow for remote manipulation of the polyaxial screw heads and remote engagement of the screw locking mechanism. A unique rod insertion device was developed that linked to the screw extension sleeves, allowing for a precut, precontoured rod to be placed through a small stab wound. Because the insertion device relies on geometrical constraint of the rod pathway through the screw heads, rods can be placed in a standard submuscular position with minimal manipulation, essentially no muscle dissection, and without the need for direct visual feedback. Twelve patients (six men and six women who ranged in age from 23–68 years) underwent pedicle screw fixation in which the rod insertion device was used. Spondylolisthesis was present in 10 patients and nonunion of a prior interbody fusion was present in two. All patients underwent successful percutaneous fixation. Ten patients underwent single-level fusions (six at L5–S1, three at L4–5, and one at L2–3), and two underwent two-level fusions (one from L–3 to L–5 and the other from L–4 to S–1). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 12 months (mean 6.8 months). Conclusions Although percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement has been described previously, longitudinal connector (rod or plate) insertion has been more problematic. The device used in this study allows for straightforward placement of lumbar pedicle screws and rods through percutaneous stab wounds. Paraspinous tissue trauma is minimized without compromising the quality of spinal fixation. Preliminary experience with this device has been promising.

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results

2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T. Foley ◽  
Sanjay K. Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Posterior Fixation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Insertion Device ◽  
Lumbar Pedicle ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Standard techniques for pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine involve open exposures and extensive muscle dissection. The purpose of this study was to report the initial clinical experience with a novel device for percutaneous posterior fixation of the lumbar spine. Methods. An existing multiaxial lumbar pedicle screw system was modified to allow screws to be placed percutaneously by using an extension sleeve that permits remote manipulation of the polyaxial screw heads and remote engagement of the screw-locking mechanism. A unique rod-insertion device was developed that linked to the screw extension sleeves, allowing for a precut and -contoured rod to be placed through a small stab wound. Because the insertion device relies on the geometrical constraint of the rod pathway through the screw heads, minimal manipulation is required to place the rods in a standard submuscular position, there is essentially no muscle dissection, and the need for direct visual feedback is avoided. Twelve patients (six men and six women) who ranged in age from 23 to 68 years underwent pedicle screw fixation in which the rod-insertion device was used. Spondylolisthesis was present in 10 patients and osseous nonunion of a prior interbody fusion was present in two. All patients underwent successful percutaneous fixation. Ten patients underwent single-level fusions (six at L5—S1, three at L4–5, and one at L2–3), and two underwent two-level fusions (one from L3–5 and the other from L4—S1). The follow-up period ranged from 10 to 19 months (mean 13.8 months). Conclusions. Although percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement has been described previously, longitudinal connector (rod or plate) insertion has been more problematic. The device used in this study allows for straightforward placement of lumbar pedicle screws and rods through percutaneous stab wounds. Paraspinous tissue trauma is minimized without compromising the quality of spinal fixation. Preliminary experience involving the use of this device has been promising.

Congenital hypoplasia of the lumbar pedicle with spondylolisthesis: report of 2 cases

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 430-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Sheng Hsieh ◽  
Sang-Ho Lee ◽  
Hyung Chang Lee ◽  
Hyeong-Seok Oh ◽  
Byeong-Wook Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Rare Condition ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
The Right ◽  
Posterior Instrumented Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Lumbar Pedicle

Congenital hypoplasia of the spinal pedicle is a rare condition. Previously reported cases were treated conservatively or with posterior instrumented fusion. However, the absence or hypoplasia of the lumbar pedicle may increase the difficulty of pedicle screw fixation and fusion. Herein, the authors describe 2 cases of rare adult congenital hypoplasia of the right lumbar pedicles associated with spondylolisthesis. The patients underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion with a stand-alone cage as well as percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. This method was used to avoid the difficulties associated with pedicle screw fixation and to attain solid fusion. Both patients achieved satisfactory outcomes after a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. This method may be an alternative for patients with congenital hypoplasia of the lumbar spinal pedicle.

scholarly journals Assessment of the outcome of percutaneous pedicle screws in management of degenerative and traumatic dorsal and lumbar pathologies

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Hussein ◽  
Hamdy Ibrahim ◽  
Hazem Mashaly ◽  
Sameh Hefny ◽  
Abdelrahman El Gayar
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Percutaneous Technique ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw

Abstract Background Percutaneous pedicle screw technique is relatively a recent technique that evolved the concept of posterior spinal instrumentation, utilizing familiar fluoroscopic landmarks to guide the procedure of screws insertion, which despite being technically demanding, it avoids the Musculo-ligamentous damage associated with the conventional posterior technique. Aim of the work This study aims to report our experience in managing traumatic and degenerative spine pathologies by the minimally invasive percutaneous technique and assessing its radiological and functional outcome. Materials and methods A prospective observational study that included the analysis of the functional, operative, biochemical, and radiological outcomes of 20 patients who underwent uniplanar fluoroscopic-guided dorsal and/or lumbar percutaneous pedicle screw fixation procedures with or without fusion using the sextant, longitude, and Spineart system and any reported complications between January 2018 and December 2019. Results The clinical and radiological analysis of 100 percutaneous pedicle screws in degenerative (n:11) and traumatic (n:9) dorsal and/or lumbar cases revealed that the biomechanical stabilizing characteristics are comparable to the conventional posterior approach with the added benefits of the paraspinal muscle-sparing. Satisfactory functional outcome represented in the improvement of the postoperative back pain visual analog score and Oswestry Disability Index Score with acceptable morbidity and complications rate was noticed. Conclusions Percutanous pedicle screw fixation is a landmark in the evolution of the minimally invasive spine surgery which can be a safe alternative to the conventional posterior muscle stripping technique with a comparable functional and radiological outcome and good biomechanical profile and an acceptable morbidity rate.

Minimally Invasive Transmuscular Pedicle Screw Fixation of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine

2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (suppl_4) ◽  
pp. ONS-361-ONS-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Ringel ◽  
Michael Stoffel ◽  
Carsten Stüer ◽  
Bernhard Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Thoracic And Lumbar Spine ◽  
Operative Notes

Abstract OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the feasibility and safety of percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation for instabilities of the thoracic and lumbar spine, using standard instruments designed for the open approach and fluoroscopy. METHODS: All patients who underwent percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine were studied retrospectively. Charts and operative notes were analyzed for epidemiological data, underlying spinal pathological features, and indications for stabilization, stabilized segments, number of implanted pedicle screws, surgical time, and complications. Postoperative computed tomographic scans were analyzed for screw position. RESULTS: From May 2002 through May 2005, 115 internal fixators were implanted percutaneously in 104 patients. A total of 488 pedicle screws were implanted, stabilizing 1 to 5 spinal motion segments. Median surgical time was 93 minutes. On postoperative computed tomographic scans, 87% of screw positions were rated good, 10% were rated acceptable, and 3% were rated unacceptable. A total of 11 revisions were necessary, 9 for misplaced screws and 2 for loosening of anchor bolts. Only two of the patients experienced new clinical symptoms (i.e., radicular pain) because of screw misplacement. No patients experienced new neurological deficits or other surgery-related morbidity. @@@@CONCLUSION:@@ This study shows that percutaneous internal pedicle screw fixation using standard instruments is feasible and safe for posterior stabilization of the thoracic and lumbar spine. It is a straightforward alternative for open approaches or minimally invasive ones using navigation in conjunction with customized instruments. Accuracy of screw placement is similar to that reported for other techniques.

Prone Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Decompression and Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Grade II Spondylolisthesis: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Komal Naeem ◽  
S Harrison Farber ◽  
Malika Bhargava ◽  
Randall W Porter
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Posterior Fixation ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation

Abstract Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) provides indirect decompression without disruption of the posterior elements. It involves a larger implant footprint than that of posterior approaches. LLIF is typically performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. When a posterior fixation is indicated, a second-stage procedure is performed with the patient in the prone position. Single-position surgery provides the potential advantage of decreased operative time because both procedures can be performed without patient repositioning. Single-position LLIF and posterior fixation in the prone position have not been well validated to date. Herein, techniques for LLIF, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, and facetectomy in the prone position are shown. A 76-yr-old woman with osteoporosis presented with severe back and bilateral leg pain refractory to conservative management and imaging findings of grade 2 dynamic anterolisthesis at L4-L5 with severe stenosis. She underwent LLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and facetectomy. She was placed on a Jackson table in the prone position for the entire procedure, which was performed in a single stage. Percutaneous pedicle screws were placed, followed by a left-sided minimally invasive facetectomy. A left-sided retroperitoneal transpsoas approach was used to perform the LLIF in standard fashion. Finally, the rods were locked into place. Postoperatively, the patient was neurologically stable, and imaging confirmed good hardware placement. At the 6-wk follow-up, the patient was doing well. This case demonstrates the feasibility of performing LLIF and posterior fixation in a single stage in the prone position. The patient provided informed consent. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document