scholarly journals Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Dual-Energy CT of the Head and Neck Compared with a Standard 120-kVp Acquisition

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1994-1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Tawfik ◽  
J.M. Kerl ◽  
A.A. Razek ◽  
R.W. Bauer ◽  
N.E. Nour-Eldin ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 586-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam ◽  
Elena Stenzel ◽  
Axel Wetter ◽  
Nika Guberina ◽  
Lale Umutlu ◽  
...  

Background Dual-energy CT (DECT) provides additional image datasets which enable improved tumor delineation or reduction of beam hardening artifacts in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Purpose To assess radiation dose and image quality of third-generation DECT of the head and neck in comparison to single-energy CT (SECT). Material and Methods Thirty patients with SCC who underwent both SECT (reference tube voltage 120 kVp) and DECT (80/150 Sn kVp) of the head and neck region for staging were retrospectively selected. Attenuation measurements of the sternomastoid muscle, internal jugular vein, submandibular gland and tongue were compared. Image noise was assessed at five anatomic levels. Subjective image quality was evaluated by two radiologists in consensus. Results CTDIvol was 55% lower with DECT (4.2 vs. 9.3 mGy; P = 0.002). Median image noise was equal or lower in DECT at all levels (nasopharynx: 3.9 vs. 5.8, P < 0.0001; floor of mouth: 3.6 vs. 4.5, P = 0.0002; arytenoids: 3.6 vs. 3.1, P = 0.096; lower thyroid: 4.4 vs. 5.7, P = 0.002; arch of aorta: 5.6 vs. 6.5, P = 0.001). Attenuation was significantly lower in DECT ( P < 0.05). Subjective image analysis revealed that DECT is equal or superior to SECT with regard to overall image quality (nasopharynx: 5 vs. 5, P = 1; floor of mouth: 5 vs. 5, P = 0.0041; arytenoids: 5 vs. 5, P = 0.6; lower thyroid: 5 vs. 3, P < 0.0001; arch of aorta: 5 vs. 4, P < 0.0001). Conclusion Head and neck imaging with third-generation DECT can reduce radiation dose by half compared to SECT, while maintaining excellent image quality.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy R. Wortman ◽  
Jeffrey Y. Shyu ◽  
Jeffrey Dileo ◽  
Jennifer W. Uyeda ◽  
Aaron D. Sodickson

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (8) ◽  
pp. 745-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Agostini ◽  
Alberto Mari ◽  
Cecilia Lanza ◽  
Nicolo’ Schicchi ◽  
Alessandra Borgheresi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 6371-6379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lifeng Yu ◽  
Jodie A. Christner ◽  
Shuai Leng ◽  
Jia Wang ◽  
Joel G. Fletcher ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 4603-4612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Lenga ◽  
Franziska Trapp ◽  
Moritz H. Albrecht ◽  
Julian L. Wichmann ◽  
Addison A. Johnson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bernhard Petritsch ◽  
Pauline Pannenbecker ◽  
Andreas Max Weng ◽  
Simon Veldhoen ◽  
Jan-Peter Grunz ◽  
...  

Purpose Comparison of dual-source dual-energy CT (DS-DECT) and split-filter dual-energy CT (SF-DECT) regarding image quality and radiation dose in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed pulmonary dual-energy CT angiography (CTPA) scans performed on two different CT scanners in 135 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Scan parameters for DS-DECT were 90/Sn150 kV (n = 68 patients), and Au/Sn120 kV for SF-DECT (n = 67 patients). The iodine delivery rate was 1400 mg/s in the DS-DECT group vs. 1750 mg/s in the SF-DECT group. Color-coded iodine distribution maps were generated for both protocols. Objective (CT attenuation of pulmonary trunk [HU], signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and subjective image quality parameters (two readers [R], five-point Likert scale), as well as radiation dose parameters (effective radiation dose, size-specific dose estimations [SSDE]) were compared. Results All CTPA scans in both groups were of diagnostic image quality. Subjective CTPA image quality was rated as good or excellent in 80.9 %/82.4 % (R1 / R2) of DS-DECT scans, and in 77.6 %/76.1 % of SF-DECT scans. For both readers, the image quality of split-filter iodine distribution maps was significantly lower (p < 0.05) with good or excellent ratings in only 43.3 %/46.3 % (R1 / R2) vs. 83.8 %/88.2 % for maps from DS-DECT. The HU values of the pulmonary trunk did not differ between the two techniques (p = n. s.), while both the SNR and CNR were significantly higher in the split-filter group (p < 0.001; p = 0.003). Both effective radiation dose (2.70 ± 1.32 mSv vs. 2.89 ± 0.94 mSv) and SSDE (4.71 ± 1.63 mGy vs. 5.84 ± 1.11 mGy) were significantly higher in the split-filter group (p < 0.05). Conclusion The split-filter allows for dual-energy imaging of suspected pulmonary embolism but is associated with lower iodine distribution map quality and higher radiation dose. Key points:  Citation Format


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias De Zordo ◽  
Klemens von Lutterotti ◽  
Christian Dejaco ◽  
Peter F. Soegner ◽  
Renate Frank ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document