Virtual Power Plant Management considering Energy Storage Systems and Multiple Power Sources

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (21) ◽  
pp. 138-143
Author(s):  
Angelo R.R. de Souza ◽  
Alexandre R. Aoki ◽  
Antonio R. Donadon ◽  
Germano Lambert-Torres ◽  
Luiz Eduardo Borges da Silva ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (21) ◽  
pp. 132-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lombardi ◽  
T. Sokolnikova ◽  
Z. Styczynski ◽  
N. Voropai

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 4447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Sikorski ◽  
Michał Jasiński ◽  
Edyta Ropuszyńska-Surma ◽  
Magdalena Węglarz ◽  
Dominika Kaczorowska ◽  
...  

This paper analyzes the technical and economic possibilities of integrating distributed energy resources (DERs) and energy-storage systems (ESSs) into a virtual power plant (VPP) and operating them as a single power plant. The purpose of the study is to assess the economic efficiency of the VPP model, which is influenced by several factors such as energy price and energy production. Ten scenarios for the VPP were prepared on the basis of the installed capacities of a hydropower plant (HPP), rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV), and energy-storage system (ESS), as well as weather conditions, in Poland. On the basis of technical conditions, it was assumed that the maximum power capacity of the ESS equaled 1.5 MW. The economic efficiency analysis presented in this paper demonstrated that, in seven years, the VPP will achieve a positive value of the net present value (NPV) for a scenario with 0.5 MW battery storage and rainy summers. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was conducted on price factors and DER production volume. The price variable had a major impact on the NPV value for all scenarios. The scenario with a 0.5 MW battery and typical summers was highly sensitive to all factors, and its sensitivity decreased as the ESS capacity grew from 0.5 to 1.5 MW.


Author(s):  
Robert Schainker ◽  
Michael Nakhamkin ◽  
John R. Stange ◽  
Louis F. Giannuzzi

Results of engineering and optimization of 25 MW and 50 MW turbomachinery trains for compressed air energy storage (CAES) power plant application are presented. Submitted by equipment suppliers, proposals are based on the commercially available equipment. Performance data and budget prices indicate that the CAES power plant is one of the most cost effective sources of providing peaking power and load management.


Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwei Ju ◽  
Peng Li ◽  
Qinliang Tan ◽  
Zhongfu Tan ◽  
GejiriFu De

To make full use of distributed energy resources to meet load demand, this study aggregated wind power plants (WPPs), photovoltaic power generation (PV), small hydropower stations (SHSs), energy storage systems (ESSs), conventional gas turbines (CGTs) and incentive-based demand responses (IBDRs) into a virtual power plant (VPP) with price-based demand response (PBDR). Firstly, a basic scheduling model for the VPP was proposed in this study with the objective of the maximum operation revenue. Secondly, a risk aversion model for the VPP was constructed based on the conditional value at risk (CVaR) method and robust optimization theory considering the operating risk from WPP and PV. Thirdly, a solution methodology was constructed and three cases were considered for comparative analyses. Finally, an independent micro-grid on an industrial park in East China was utilized for an example analysis. The results show the following: (1) the proposed risk aversion scheduling model could cope with the uncertainty risk via a reasonable confidence degree β and robust coefficient Γ. When Γ ≤ 0.85 or Γ ≥ 0.95, a small uncertainty brought great risk, indicating that the risk attitude of the decision maker will affect the scheduling scheme of the VPP, and the decision maker belongs to the risk extreme aversion type. When Γ ∈ (0.85, 0.95), the decision-making scheme was in a stable state, the growth of β lead to the increase of CVaR, but the magnitude was not large. When the prediction error e was higher, the value of CVaR increased more when Γ increased by the same magnitude, which indicates that a lower prediction accuracy will amplify the uncertainty risk. (2) when the capacity ratio of (WPP, PV): ESS was higher than 1.5:1 and the peak-to-valley price gap was higher than 3:1, the values of revenue, VaR, and CVaR changed slower, indicating that both ESS and PBDR can improve the operating revenue, but the capacity scale of ESS and the peak-valley price gap need to be set properly, considering both economic benefits and operating risks. Therefore, the proposed risk aversion model could maximize the utilization of clean energy to obtain higher economic benefits while rationally controlling risks and provide reliable decision support for developing optimal operation plans for the VPP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document