Legal Status of the Victim in Canadian Youth Justice

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 165-194
Author(s):  
Hyeok Kim
Youth Justice ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 147322542092517
Author(s):  
Taryn Hepburn ◽  
Dale Spencer ◽  
Rosemary Ricciardelli

In the current article, we document the changing roles and responsibilities related to the implementation of the Canadian Youth Criminal Justice Act ( YCJA). Police officers’ experiences and responses to the implementation of the YCJA reveal a disparity between the officers’ idealised role and their actual tasks involving youth. Drawing on Bourdieu’s theory of the habitus and field, we consider the field of youth justice and its effects on rural policing strategies in Canada. We consider the shifting standard for police behaviours from data gathered through interviews and focus groups with police officers. We find standards in the field of policing shift to reflect new realities enacted with the YCJA.


2020 ◽  
pp. 009385482096451
Author(s):  
Shelley L. Brown ◽  
Kayla A. Wanamaker ◽  
Leigh Greiner ◽  
Terri Scott ◽  
Tracey A. Skilling

How complex trauma features and criminogenic needs co-vary within youth justice populations requires examination. This study applies latent profile analysis to a sample of 311 justice-involved Canadian youth (211 male, 100 female) to identify if unique profiles of youth would emerge delineated by different combinations of comorbid needs pulled from complex trauma and personality/social learning models. Two similar profiles emerged for males and females alike: a complex trauma with criminogenic needs profile (70% of females, 58.8% of males) and a low overall needs profile (30% of females, 41.2% of males). Surprisingly, the Youth-Level Service/Case Management Inventory predicted recidivism well among the complex trauma/criminogenic need female cases (AUC = .71), but poorly among the complex trauma/criminogenic need male cases (AUC = .59). Trauma-informed approaches that target criminogenic needs in both genders is a clear implication of the findings.


Author(s):  
Michele Peterson-Badali ◽  
Rona Abramovitch ◽  
Christopher J. Koegl ◽  
Martin D. Ruck

1994 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 333
Author(s):  
Robert M. Gordon ◽  
Bernard Schissel

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony N. Doob ◽  
Jane B. Sprott
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-233
Author(s):  
Étienne F Lacombe

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child confers on children a number of rights, not the least of which is the guarantee that their best interests shall be a primary consideration in all actions that concern them. This article applies the Best Interests of the Child [BIC] principle—a widespread concept in family law—to the context of criminal policy. It calls for a rebalancing of Canadian youth justice so as to prioritize children’s best interests. As marginalized societal actors, children are at risk of seeing their interests increasingly overlooked if they are not brought to the fore.      Once a defining feature of Canada’s response to juvenile delinquency, the BIC principle has waned in the face of sweeping penal populism. Examples from Scotland, Scandinavia and Washington reveal means by which child-friendly justice systems can withstand the influence of punitive public sentiment. Mirroring such approaches in Canada would require repurposing the deeply engrained concept of proportionality and viewing children’s interests as inherent to advancing public safety.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document