A Comparative study on the conflict resolution in internet stories of Korea and China

2021 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 185-217
Author(s):  
Jaeyong Choi
2008 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 847-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Thierry ◽  
Filippo Aureli ◽  
Charles L. Nunn ◽  
Odile Petit ◽  
Christophe Abegg ◽  
...  

1969 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
William D. Popkin ◽  
L. Hart Wright ◽  
Jean van Hutte ◽  
Pierre Kerlan ◽  
Helmut Debatin ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 184
Author(s):  
Mingjing Su

<p><em>A Passage to India is the magnum opus of E.</em><em> </em><em>M. Forster—a famous English novelist in the first half of 20th century. This essay does a comparative study about the different changing courses in the two heroines’ mind in India. Adela, one of them, tends to spiritualism from traditional English rationalism (materialism or literalism). While the other, Mrs. Moore, goes roughly from emotionalism to rationalism. However, there are two diverse outcomes: Adela builds her new mental scene finally, but Mrs. Moore fails to remodel herself after the collapse of her perceptual world. And the paper makes a deep analysis on the reason giving rise to such results. It is found, there are two main reasons. One is the different importance of the original values in their soul. The other one is the disparate conflict resolution styles when great changes happen in their inner heart.</em></p>


Cities ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Osei-Kyei ◽  
Albert P.C. Chan ◽  
Yao Yu ◽  
Chuan Chen ◽  
Ayirebi Dansoh

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 2061-2096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Elfversson

How does government bias affect prospects for peace agreements in communal conflicts? Government bias has been shown to have a strong impact on the incidence and dynamics of localized ethnic conflict, but the way that it affects conflict resolution remains underexplored. I argue that government bias makes the conflict parties less likely to overcome the commitment problem, because they cannot trust the government’s willingness to guarantee or uphold any agreement they reach. Consequently, bias reduces the chances that the parties are able to reach a peace agreement. A systematic comparison of four cases in Kenya provides support for this argument. I also distinguish between bias related to strategic interest and bias related to relationships, and find that the former is more durable, whereas the latter is more likely to be influenced by political turnover, thereby opening up possibilities for peacemaking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document