Diagnostic Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers (Phospho-Tau181, total-Tau, Aβ42, and Aβ40) in Prodromal Stage of Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1069-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Bousiges ◽  
Benjamin Cretin ◽  
Thomas Lavaux ◽  
Nathalie Philippi ◽  
Barbara Jung ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 467-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Bousiges ◽  
Stephanie Bombois ◽  
Susanna Schraen ◽  
David Wallon ◽  
Muriel Muraine Quillard ◽  
...  

BackgroundDifferential diagnosis between dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is not straightforward, especially in the early stages of disease. We compared AD biomarkers (phospho-Tau181, total-Tau, Aβ42 and Aβ40) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with DLB and AD, focusing especially on the prodromal stage.MethodsA total of 1221 CSF were collected in different memory centres (ePLM network) in France and analysed retrospectively. Samples were obtained from patients with prodromal DLB (pro-DLB; n=57), DLB dementia (DLB-d; n=154), prodromal AD (pro-AD; n=132) and AD dementia (n=783), and control subjects (CS; n=95). These centres use the same diagnostic procedure and criteria to evaluate the patients.ResultsIn patients with pro-DLB, CSF Aβ42 levels appeared much less disrupted than in patients at the demented stage (DLB-d) (P<0.05 CS>pro-DLB; P<0.001 CS>DLB-d). On average, Aβ40 levels in patients with DLB (pro-DLB and DLB-d) were much below those in patients with pro-AD (P<0.001 DLB groups<pro-AD). The Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio in patients with pro-DLB remained close to that of CS. t-Tau and phospho-Tau181 levels were unaltered in patients with DLB (pro-DLB and DLB-d).ConclusionsReduced levels of CSF Aβ42 were found in patients with DLB but rather at a later stage, reaching those of patients with AD, in whom Aβ42 levels were decreased even at the prodromal stage. At the prodromal stage of DLB, the majority of patients presented a normal CSF profile. CSF t-Tau and phospho-Tau181 were the best biomarkers to discriminate between AD and DLB, whatever the stage of disease.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier BOUSIGES ◽  
Nathalie Philippi ◽  
Thomas Lavaux ◽  
Armand Perret-Liaudet ◽  
Ingolf Lachmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Several studies have investigated the value of alpha-synuclein assay in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) patients in the differential diagnosis of these two pathologies. However, very few studies have focused on this assay in AD and DLB patients at the MCI stage.Methods: All patients were enrolled under a hospital clinical research protocol from the tertiary Memory Clinic (CM2R) of Alsace, France, by an experienced team of clinicians. A total of 166 patients were included in this study: 21 control subjects (CS), 51 patients with DLB at the prodromal stage (pro-DLB), 16 patients with DLB at the demented stage (DLB-d), 33 AD patients at the prodromal stage (pro-AD), 32 AD patients at the demented stage (AD-d) and 13 patients with mixed pathology (AD+DLB). CSF levels of total alpha-synuclein were assessed using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for alpha-synuclein (AJ Roboscreen). Alzheimer’s biomarkers (t-Tau, P-Tau, Aβ42 and Aβ40) were also measured.Results: The alpha-synuclein assays showed a significant difference between the AD and DLB groups. Total alpha-synuclein levels were significantly higher in AD patients than in DLB patients. Interestingly, the levels appeared to be altered from the prodromal stage in both AD and DLB. Furthermore, alpha-synuclein levels were elevated not only in AD patients with a typical “Alzheimer” profile (i.e. 2 or 3 pathological biomarkers) but also in AD patients with an atypical “Alzheimer” profile (i.e. one or no pathological biomarkers).Conclusions: The modification of total alpha-synuclein levels in the CSF of patients occurs early, from the prodromal stage. Moreover, alpha-synuclein assay appears to be of particular interest in the differential diagnosis of AD in cases where the Alzheimer biomarkers do not have a typical profile of the disease, i.e. when there is only one or no pathological biomarkers.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, (AlphaLewyMa, Identifier: NCT01876459)


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier BOUSIGES ◽  
Nathalie Philippi ◽  
Thomas Lavaux ◽  
Armand Perret-Liaudet ◽  
Ingolf Lachmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Several studies have investigated the value of alpha-synuclein assay in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) patients in the differential diagnosis of these two pathologies. However, very few studies have focused on this assay in AD and DLB patients at the MCI stage.Methods: All patients were enrolled under a hospital clinical research protocol from the tertiary Memory Clinic (CM2R) of Alsace, France, by an experienced team of clinicians. A total of 166 patients were included in this study: 21 control subjects (CS), 51 patients with DLB at the prodromal stage (pro-DLB), 16 patients with DLB at the demented stage (DLB-d), 33 AD patients at the prodromal stage (pro-AD), 32 AD patients at the demented stage (AD-d) and 13 patients with mixed pathology (AD+DLB). CSF levels of total alpha-synuclein were assessed using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for alpha-synuclein (AJ Roboscreen). Alzheimer’s biomarkers (t-Tau, P-Tau, Aβ42 and Aβ40) were also measured.Results: The alpha-synuclein assays showed a significant difference between the AD and DLB groups. Total alpha-synuclein levels were significantly higher in AD patients than in DLB patients. However, the ROC curves show a moderate discriminating power between AD and DLB (AUC = 0.78) which does not improve the discriminating power of the combination of Alzheimer biomarkers (AUC = 0.95 with or without alpha-synuclein). Interestingly, the levels appeared to be altered from the prodromal stage in both AD and DLB.Conclusions: The modification of total alpha-synuclein levels in the CSF of patients occurs early, from the prodromal stage. The adding of alpha-synuclein total to the combination of Alzheimer’s biomarker does not improve the differential diagnosis between AD and DLB.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, (AlphaLewyMa, Identifier: NCT01876459)


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier BOUSIGES ◽  
Nathalie Philippi ◽  
Thomas Lavaux ◽  
Armand Perret-Liaudet ◽  
Ingolf Lachmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Several studies have investigated the value of alpha-synuclein assay in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) patients in the differential diagnosis of these two pathologies. However, very few studies have focused on this assay in AD and DLB patients at the MCI stage.Methods: All patients were enrolled under a hospital clinical research protocol from the tertiary Memory Clinic (CM2R) of Alsace, France, by an experienced team of clinicians. A total of 166 patients were included in this study: 21 control subjects (CS), 51 patients with DLB at the prodromal stage (pro-DLB), 16 patients with DLB at the demented stage (DLB-d), 33 AD patients at the prodromal stage (pro-AD), 32 AD patients at the demented stage (AD-d) and 13 patients with mixed pathology (AD+DLB). CSF levels of total alpha-synuclein were assessed using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for alpha-synuclein (AJ Roboscreen). Alzheimer’s biomarkers (t-Tau, P-Tau, Aβ42 and Aβ40) were also measured.Results: The alpha-synuclein assays showed a significant difference between the AD and DLB groups. Total alpha-synuclein levels were significantly higher in AD patients than in DLB patients. However, the ROC curves show a moderate discriminating power between AD and DLB (AUC = 0.78) which does not improve the discriminating power of the combination of Alzheimer biomarkers (AUC = 0.95 with or without alpha-synuclein). Interestingly, the levels appeared to be altered from the prodromal stage in both AD and DLB.Conclusions: The modification of total alpha-synuclein levels in the CSF of patients occurs early, from the prodromal stage. The adding of alpha-synuclein total to the combination of Alzheimer’s biomarker does not improve the differential diagnosis between AD and DLB.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, (AlphaLewyMa, Identifier: NCT01876459)


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Bousiges ◽  
Nathalie Philippi ◽  
Thomas Lavaux ◽  
Armand Perret-Liaudet ◽  
Ingolf Lachmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several studies have investigated the value of alpha-synuclein assay in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) patients in the differential diagnosis of these two pathologies. However, very few studies have focused on this assay in AD and DLB patients at the MCI stage. Methods All patients were enrolled under a hospital clinical research protocol from the tertiary Memory Clinic (CM2R) of Alsace, France, by an experienced team of clinicians. A total of 166 patients were included in this study: 21 control subjects (CS), 51 patients with DLB at the prodromal stage (pro-DLB), 16 patients with DLB at the demented stage (DLB-d), 33 AD patients at the prodromal stage (pro-AD), 32 AD patients at the demented stage (AD-d), and 13 patients with mixed pathology (AD+DLB). CSF levels of total alpha-synuclein were assessed using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for alpha-synuclein (AJ Roboscreen). Alzheimer’s biomarkers (t-Tau, P-Tau, Aβ42, and Aβ40) were also measured. Results The alpha-synuclein assays showed a significant difference between the AD and DLB groups. Total alpha-synuclein levels were significantly higher in AD patients than in DLB patients. However, the ROC curves show a moderate discriminating power between AD and DLB (AUC = 0.78) which does not improve the discriminating power of the combination of Alzheimer biomarkers (AUC = 0.95 with or without alpha-synuclein). Interestingly, the levels appeared to be altered from the prodromal stage in both AD and DLB. Conclusions The modification of total alpha-synuclein levels in the CSF of patients occurs early, from the prodromal stage. The adding of alpha-synuclein total to the combination of Alzheimer’s biomarker does not improve the differential diagnosis between AD and DLB. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01876459 (AlphaLewyMa)


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier BOUSIGES ◽  
Nathalie Philippi ◽  
Thomas Lavaux ◽  
Armand Perret-Liaudet ◽  
Ingolf Lachmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Several studies have investigated the value of alpha-synuclein assay in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) patients in the differential diagnosis of these two pathologies. However, very few studies have focused on this assay in AD and DLB patients at the MCI stage.Methods: All patients were enrolled under a hospital clinical research protocol from the tertiary Memory Clinic (CM2R) of Alsace, France, by an experienced team of clinicians. A total of 166 patients were included in this study: 21 control subjects (CS), 51 patients with DLB at the prodromal stage (pro-DLB), 16 patients with DLB at the demented stage (DLB-d), 33 AD patients at the prodromal stage (pro-AD), 32 AD patients at the demented stage (AD-d) and 13 patients with mixed pathology (AD+DLB). CSF levels of total alpha-synuclein were assessed using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for alpha-synuclein (AJ Roboscreen). Alzheimer’s biomarkers (t-Tau, P-Tau, Aβ42 and Aβ40) were also measured.Results: The alpha-synuclein assays showed a significant difference between the AD and DLB groups. Total alpha-synuclein levels were significantly higher in AD patients than in DLB patients. However, the ROC curves show a moderate discriminating power between MA and DLB (AUC = 0.78) which does not improve the discriminating power of the combination of Alzheimer biomarkers (AUC = 0.95 with or without alpha-synuclein). Interestingly, the levels appeared to be altered from the prodromal stage in both AD and DLB.Conclusions: The modification of total alpha-synuclein levels in the CSF of patients occurs early, from the prodromal stage. The adding of alpha-synuclein total to the combination of Alzheimer’s biomarker does not improve the differential diagnosis between AD and DLB.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, (AlphaLewyMa, Identifier: NCT01876459)


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Fabricio Ferreira de Oliveira ◽  
Marjorie Câmara Miraldo ◽  
Eduardo Ferreira de Castro-Neto ◽  
Sandro Soares de Almeida ◽  
Sandro Luiz de Andrade Matas ◽  
...  

Background: Behavioral features may reflect proteinopathies predicting pathophysiology in neurodegenerative diseases. Objective: We aimed to investigate associations of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of amyloidogenesis and neurodegeneration with neuropsychiatric features in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) compared with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cognitively healthy people. Methods: Consecutive outpatients with DLB were paired with outpatients with AD according to sex, dementia stage, and cognitive scores, and with cognitively healthy controls according to sex and age to investigate associations of cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β (Aβ)42, Aβ40, Aβ38, total tau, phospho-tau Thr181, α-synuclein, ubiquitin, and neurofilament light with neuropsychiatric features according to APOE ɛ4 carrier status. Results: Overall, 27 patients with DLB (78.48±9.0 years old, eleven APOE ɛ4 carriers) were paired with 27 patients with AD (81.00±5.8 years old, twelve APOE ɛ4 carriers) and 27 controls (78.48±8.7 years old, four APOE ɛ4 carriers); two thirds were women. Behavioral burden was more intense in DLB. Biomarker ratios reflecting amyloidogenesis and neurodegeneration in DLB were more similar to those in AD when patients carried APOE ɛ4 alleles. After corrections for false discovery rates, the following associations remained significant: in DLB, dysphoria was associated with tauopathy and indirect measures of amyloidogenesis, while in AD, agitation, and night-time behavior disturbances were associated with tauopathy, and delusions were associated with tauopathy and indirect measures of amyloidogenesis. Conclusion: Biomarker ratios were superior to Aβ and tau biomarkers predicting neuropsychiatric symptoms when associations with isolated biomarkers were not significant. At the end, APOE ɛ4 carrier status influenced amyloidogenesis and tau pathology in DLB and in AD, and axonal degeneration only in DLB.


2007 ◽  
Vol 203 (2) ◽  
pp. 579-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenjiro Ono ◽  
Moeko Noguchi-Shinohara ◽  
Mitsuhiro Yoshita ◽  
Hironobu Naiki ◽  
Masahito Yamada

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Blanc ◽  
Sean J. Colloby ◽  
Benjamin Cretin ◽  
Paulo Loureiro de Sousa ◽  
Catherine Demuynck ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document