Muscle synergy extraction during arm reaching movements at different speeds

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahid Reza Sabzevari ◽  
Amir Homayoun Jafari ◽  
Reza Boostani
2014 ◽  
Vol 95 (10) ◽  
pp. e26
Author(s):  
Sambit Mohapatra ◽  
Evan Chan ◽  
Rachael Harrington ◽  
Alexander Dromerick ◽  
Peter Turkeltaub ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 2033-2043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Sharif Razavian ◽  
Borna Ghannadi ◽  
Naser Mehrabi ◽  
Mark Charlet ◽  
John McPhee

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 1123-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiji Hoshi ◽  
Jun Tanji

We compared neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral premotor areas (PMd and PMv, respectively) when monkeys were preparing to perform arm-reaching movements in a motor-set period before their actual execution. They were required to select one of four possible movements (reaching to a target on the left or right, using either the left or right arm) in accordance with two sets of instruction cues, followed by a delay period, and a subsequent motor-set period. During the motor-set period, the monkeys were required to get ready for a movement-trigger signal to start the arm-reach promptly. We analyzed the activity of 211 PMd and 109 PMv neurons that showed selectivity for the combination of the two instruction cues during the motor-set period. A majority (53%) of PMd neurons exhibited activity significantly tuned to both target location and arm use, and an approximately equal number of PMd neurons showed selectivity to either forthcoming arm use or target location. In contrast, 60% of PMv neurons showed selectivity for target location only and not for arm use. These findings point to preference in the use of neuronal activity in the two areas: preparation for action in the PMd and preparation for target acquisition in the PMv.


2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Ohta ◽  
Mikhail M. Svinin ◽  
ZhiWei Luo ◽  
Shigeyuki Hosoe ◽  
Rafael Laboissi�re

Basal Ganglia ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 260 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Spadacenta ◽  
G. Giannini ◽  
N. Modugno ◽  
G. Mirabella

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 1414-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo-Hyun Song ◽  
Robert M. McPeek

We recently demonstrated that inactivation of the primate superior colliculus (SC) causes a deficit in target selection for arm-reaching movements when the reach target is located in the inactivated field (Song JH, Rafal RD, McPeek RM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: E1433–E1440, 2011). This is consistent with the notion that the SC is part of a general-purpose target selection network beyond eye movements. To understand better the role of SC activity in reach target selection, we examined how individual SC neurons in the intermediate layers discriminate a reach target from distractors. Monkeys reached to touch a color oddball target among distractors while maintaining fixation. We found that many SC neurons robustly discriminate the goal of the reaching movement before the onset of the reach even though no saccade is made. To identify these cells in the context of conventional SC cell classification schemes, we also recorded visual, delay-period, and saccade-related responses in a delayed saccade task. On average, SC cells that discriminated the reach target from distractors showed significantly higher visual and delay-period activity than nondiscriminating cells, but there was no significant difference in saccade-related activity. Whereas a majority of SC neurons that discriminated the reach target showed significant delay-period activity, all nondiscriminating cells lacked such activity. We also found that some cells without delay-period activity did discriminate the reach target from distractors. We conclude that the majority of intermediate-layer SC cells discriminate a reach target from distractors, consistent with the idea that the SC contains a priority map used for effector-independent target selection.


2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (5) ◽  
pp. 2342-2345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunji Wang ◽  
Yupeng Xiao ◽  
Etienne Burdet ◽  
James Gordon ◽  
Nicolas Schweighofer

Whether the central nervous system minimizes variability or effort in planning arm movements can be tested by measuring the preferred movement duration and end-point variability. Here we conducted an experiment in which subjects performed arm reaching movements without visual feedback in fast-, medium-, slow-, and preferred-duration conditions. Results show that 1) total end-point variance was smallest in the medium-duration condition and 2) subjects preferred to carry out movements that were slower than this medium-duration condition. A parsimonious explanation for the overall pattern of end-point errors across fast, medium, preferred, and slow movement durations is that movements are planned to minimize effort as well as end-point error due to both signal-dependent and constant noise.


1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 2120-2122 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ma ◽  
A. G. Feldman

1. To address the problem of the coordination of a redundant number of degrees of freedom in motor control, we analyzed the influence of voluntary trunk movements on the arm endpoint trajectory during reaching. 2. Subjects made fast noncorrected planar movements of the right arm from a near to a far target located in the ipsilateral work space at a 45 degrees angle to the sagittal midline of the trunk. These reaching movements were combined with a forward or a backward sagittal motion of the trunk. 3. The direction, positional error, curvature, and velocity profile of the endpoint trajectory remained invariant regardless of trunk movements. Trunk motion preceded endpoint motion by approximately 175 ms, continued during endpoint movement to the target, and outlasted it by 200 ms. This sequence of trunk and arm movements was observed regardless of the direction of the endpoint trajectory (to or from the far target) or trunk movements (forward or backward). 4. Our data imply that reaching movements result from two control synergies: one coordinates trunk and arm movements leaving the position of the endpoint unchanged, and the other produces interjoint coordination shifting the arm endpoint to the target. The use of functionally different synergies may underlie a solution of the redundancy problem.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz de França Bahia Loureiro Junior ◽  
Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira de Freitas ◽  
Paulo Barbosa de Freitas

The effects of target location and uncertainty of target position on reaching movements while standing were investigated. Ten healthy, right-handed adults stood facing a 17'' touchscreen. They were instructed to press with their right index fingertip a push bottom and touch the center of the target displayed on the screen after it was lighted on, moving quickly their arm. The target was shown either ipsi- or contralateral to the right arm and either in a certain or uncertain position. Reaction time (RT), movement time (MT), and radial error (RE) were assessed. Results revealed shorter RT (≈ 35 ms) and smaller RE (≈ 0.19 cm) for certain than for uncertain condition and slightly longer RT (≈ 8 ms) and MT (≈ 18 ms) for reaches towards the contralateral target. In conclusion, the findings of this study showing the effect of uncertainty of target location as well as target position are also applied to arm reaching in standing position.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document