Understanding and building upon effort to return to work for people with long-term disability and job loss

Work ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.L. Saunders ◽  
E. MacEachen ◽  
B. Nedelec
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radu-Ioan Popa

Abstract The present article follows an in-depth analysis of several relevant articles and major findings concerning the return to work of cancer patients, in various situations, from a manager and patient point of view, putting into discussion the effects and consequences of different factors that may influence the well-being of the patient at work and impact the organizational life. The concepts of returning to work and integration are scarcely analysed throughout the scholarly literature in the case of employees diagnosed with cancer, due to several reasons presented in the paper: from the complex topic of investigation that many studies fail to approach in terms of confidentiality, technical, ethical and moral grounds to the specific and difficult apparatus for research in the case of an even more complex, multiple instances and personalized manifestation long-term illness. In conclusion, the general framework solicits for a more integrated model of research and future multi-facet schemes for interventions, considering that there is a general consensus focusing on the need for connecting the health services with the employee and employer level, alongside stakeholders’ active participation.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e85038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabe de Vries ◽  
Hiske L. Hees ◽  
Maarten W. J. Koeter ◽  
Suzanne E. Lagerveld ◽  
Aart H. Schene

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Peters ◽  
Simon Pickvance ◽  
Jane Wilford ◽  
Ewan MacDonald ◽  
Lindsay Blank

2000 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEVEN J. ATLAS ◽  
YUCHIAO CHANG ◽  
ERIN KAMMANN ◽  
ROBERT B. KELLER ◽  
RICHARD A. DEYO ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Gustafsson ◽  
G Lundh ◽  
P Svedberg ◽  
J Linder ◽  
K Alexanderson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-167
Author(s):  
Kelvin Choi ◽  
Esther T Maas ◽  
Mieke Koehoorn ◽  
Christopher B McLeod

ObjectivesThis study examined time to return-to-work (RTW) among direct healthcare and social workers with violence-related incidents compared with these workers with non-violence-related incidents in British Columbia, Canada.MethodsAccepted workers’ compensation lost-time claims were extracted between 2010 and 2014. Workers with violence-related incidents and with non-violence-related incidents were matched using coarsened exact matching (n=5762). The outcome was days until RTW within 1 year after the first day of time loss, estimated with Cox regression using piecewise models, stratified by injury type, occupation, care setting and shift type.ResultsWorkers with violence-related incidents, compared with workers with non-violence-related incidents, were more likely to RTW within 30 days postinjury, less likely within 61–180 days, and were no different after 181 days. Workers with psychological injuries resulting from a violence-related incident had a lower likelihood to RTW during the year postinjury (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.86). Workers with violence-related incidents in counselling and social work occupations were less likely to RTW within 90 days postinjury (HR 31–60 days: 0.67, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.95 and HR 61–90 days: 0.46, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.69). Workers with violence-related incidents in long-term care and residential social services were less likely to RTW within 91–180 days postinjury.ConclusionsWorkers with psychological injuries, and those in counselling and social work occupations and in long-term care and residential social services, took longer to RTW following a violence-related incident than workers with non-violence-related incidents. Future research should focus on identifying risk factors to reduce the burden of violence and facilitate RTW.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document