scholarly journals Omental Bursa

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (8) ◽  
pp. 2336-2340
Author(s):  
Masahiro TAWADA ◽  
Masahiko KAWAI ◽  
Shigeru KIYAMA ◽  
Chihiro TANAKA ◽  
Narutoshi NAGAO ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 108-114
Author(s):  
A. A. Kurtseva ◽  
E. S. Chernomortseva ◽  
M. G. Konyukhova

This essay is about the differences in the description of the upper story of the peritoneal cavity, the omental bursa and omental (epiploic) foramen, which connects the omental bursa (lesser sac) with the rest of the peritoneal cavity (greater sac). The difference in the description of the omental bursa causes misunderstanding during the study of the topic «The stories of the peritoneal cavity». The misunderstanding is especially well expressed when we teach the foreign students because there is a great difference in the description of the omental bursa in Russian and English literature. That is why we decided to analyze the data of the omental bursa in different literal sources. We analyzed 11 textbooks, 5 of the mare Russian and 6 of the mare English, most useful for the students during the preparing the material for Anatomy classes. The results are given in tables.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Pankaj Kumar Garg ◽  
Ashish Jakhetiya ◽  
Kiran Kalyan Turaga ◽  
Rahul Kumar ◽  
Andreas Brandl ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Resection of the omental bursa has been suggested to reduce peritoneal recurrence and facilitate a complete oncological resection during a gastrectomy. The addition of this procedure increases technical complexity and prolongs the procedure. Published data regarding the oncological benefit of this procedure are conflicting. We hypothesized that a bursectomy during a radical gastrectomy does not improve overall survival. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline, a comprehensive literature search of 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) was conducted to identify the clinical studies that compared bursectomy with no-bursectomy in radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Qualitative and quantitative data synthesis was performed using RevMan software. A random-/fixed-effect modeling was used depending upon the heterogeneity. Bias and quality assessment tools were applied. The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42019116556). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 8 studies assessing the role of bursectomy in gastric adenocarcinoma, 6 (75%) were included – of which 2 (33%) are randomized controlled trials. Of 2,904 patients, 1,273 (%) underwent a bursectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in either overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89, 95% CI 0.75–1.06, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 14%) or disease recurrence (HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.84–1.20, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 22%) in the bursectomy group compared to the no-bursectomy group. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There is no additional oncological benefit of adding bursectomy to radical gastrectomy in all patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.


1982 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 26-28
Author(s):  
О. S. Kochnev ◽  
N. P. Evdokimov

A method for direct endoscopy of the pancreas and omental bursa has been developed. 26 out of 35 patients with pancreatitis were able to examine and carry out therapeutic measures using this method.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-66
Author(s):  
S. Alessi ◽  
C. Bortolotto ◽  
Luisa Carone

2017 ◽  
pp. 4-9
Author(s):  
V. M. Mayorov ◽  
Z. A. Dundarov

Wide use of interventional radiology methods is one of the promising trends in the improvement of the treatment of patients with severe pancreatitis. The minimally invasive interferences carried out under beam rider guidance, such as percutaneous punctures and percutaneous drainage, endovascular hemostasis and endovascular catheterization of celiac trunk, are effective at all stages of the course of severe pancreatitis, and make it possible to avoid open operational interference in 40-90 % cases and to decrease mortality up to 8-9 %. The article presents the review of national and foreign publications dealing with controversial questions of surgical tactics in sharp liquid formations of the pancreas and omental bursa, effectiveness of the use of percutaneous draining operational interference in infected pancreatic necrosis and parapancreatitis. The world experience of endovascular stoppage of major haemorrhagic complications in patients with acute and chronic inflammatory diseases of the pancreas has been summarized. Questions of the selective intra-arterial infusion of medicines in severe pancreatitis have been studied.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
B. Barieva

Among rheumatic diseases, a special place is occupied by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), this is due to its variety of clinical nonspecific manifestations, which leads to diagnostic difficulties in the early stages.This article presents a clinical case of severe SLE, previously not diagnosed and untreated, with the rapid progression of multiple organ failure (damage to the lungs, cardiovascular system, kidneys), which led to death. Previously, the patient was treated in the oncology and surgical departments with an abscess of the omental bursa and steatopancreonecrosis, later she was hospitalized in the hematology department with three-growth pancytopenia and hemolytic anemia, and from there transferred to the rheumatology department. This clinical situation demonstrates the importance of timely diagnosis, diagnosis and treatment of SLE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document