scholarly journals Better Outcomes With Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy Than Conventional Thyroidectomy

Acta Medica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 8-13
Author(s):  
Nilda Sütay Süslü ◽  
Cagri Kulekci ◽  
Selcuk Dagdelen ◽  
Nafiye Yildiz ◽  
Tomris Erbas
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy ◽  
Invasive Group ◽  
Permanent Hypocalcemia ◽  
Invasive Techniques

Introduction Aim of this study was to evaluate our results from conventional and minimally invasive thyroidectomy and compare their outcomes. Materials and Methods 137 patients undergone conventional and minimally invasive thyroidectomy (video-assisted and open technique with mini-cervicotomy) were reviewed. Demographic data, blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain, cosmetic outcome and complications were examined and compared. Results Minimally invasive group consists of 53 cases(39%) and conventional group is composed of 84 cases(61%). No conversion from minimally invasive to conventional techniques was observed. In minimally invasive group, 25 patients(47%) had differantiated thyroid carcinoma and 28 patients(53%) had benign pathologies. Postoperative complications include transient hypocalcemia in 5 patients(3.6%) (4 in conventional, 1 in minimally invasive group), permanent hypocalcemia in 4 patients(3%) (3 in conventional, 1 in minimally invasive group), unilateral vocal cord paralysis in 2 patients(2%) (1 in conventional, 1 in minimally invasive group). Operative time was similar in both groups; however blood loss during surgery, postoperative pain was significantly lower in minimally invasive group. Conclusion Minimally invasive techniques could be implemented on selected carcinoma patients and results in equal safety and less surgical morbidity. Keywords: minimally invasive thyroidectomy, thyroid cancer, MIVAT

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery Is a Feasible Option for Management of Idiopathic Scoliosis and Has Equivalent Outcomes to Open Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822098826
Author(s):  
Abduljabbar Alhammoud ◽  
Yahya Alborno ◽  
Abdul Moeen Baco ◽  
Yahya Azhar Othman ◽  
Yoji Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Scoliosis Surgery ◽  
Curve Correction ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Feasible Option

Study Design: Meta-analysis. Objective: To compare outcomes between minimally invasive scoliosis surgery (MISS) and traditional posterior instrumentation and fusion in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar and Cochrane databases, including studies reporting outcomes for both MISS and open correction of AIS. Study details, demographics, and outcomes, including curve correction, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, postoperative pain, length of stay (LOS), and complications, were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 4 studies met the selection criteria and were included in the analysis, totaling 107 patients (42 MIS and 65 open) with a mean age of 16 years. Overall there was no difference in curve correction between MISS (73.2%) and open (76.7%) cohorts. EBL was significantly lower in the MISS (271 ml) compared to the open (527 ml) group, but operative time was significantly longer (380 min for MISS versus 302 min for open). There were no significant differences between the approaches in pain, LOS, complications, or reoperations. Conclusion: MISS was associated with less blood loss but longer operative times compared to traditional open fusion for AIS. There was no difference in curve correction, postoperative pain, LOS, or complications/reoperations. While MISS has emerged as a feasible option for the surgical management of AIS, further research is warranted to compare these 2 approaches.

TECHNIQUE AND CLINICAL RESULTS OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE RECONSTRUCTION AND STABILIZATION OF THE THORACIC AND THORACOLUMBAR SPINE WITH EXPANDABLE CAGES AND VENTROLATERAL PLATE FIXATION

Neurosurgery ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 798-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Michael Scheufler
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Vertebral Body Replacement ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity

Abstract OBJECTIVE To evaluate the techniques of minimally invasive single- and multilevel corpectomy and reconstruction of the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine using expandable vertebral body replacement (VBR) cages and ventrolateral plate fixation (VPF) via anterolateral retropleural (ALRA) and combined thoracoabdominal approaches. METHODS 38 patients with spondylitis, traumatic or metastatic lesions of thoracic or thoracolumbar vertebrae T4 to L2 underwent spinal decompression and ventral column reconstruction with correction of spinal deformity by VBR and VPF via ALRA or a combined lateral extrapleural/extraperitoneal (extracoelomic) thoracolumbar approach (CLETA). Overall clinical and neurological outcome, operative time, blood loss, reduction of deformity, and postoperative pain were assessed during a mean follow-up period of 22.8 months. RESULTS VBR and VPF were carried out successfully without conversion to conventional approaches in all patients. Mean operative time (ALRA, 163 ± 33 min; CLETA, 175 ± 39 min), mean blood loss (ALRA, 280 ± 160 ml; CLETA, 420 ± 250 ml), average correction (19.3 degrees), loss of correction of sagittal deformity (0.9 degrees), and clinical outcome compare favorably to the results reported for open and endoscopic techniques. Postoperative pain levels (mean visual analog scale score at 24 h, 2.7 ± 0.9) and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction (three out of 38 patients) were low. The average length of stay was 7.4 days. ALRA and CLETA obviate routine chest tube insertion, thus allowing for early postoperative ambulation (average, 1.1 d). CONCLUSION Minimally invasive VBR and VPF conducted via minimally invasive approaches (ALRA or CLETA) yields favorable clinical results at least equal to conventional open surgery, with significant reductions in perioperative morbidity and pain, expedited ambulation, and early discharge from the hospital.

The Emerging Role of Robotic Single-site Approach for Myomectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062098822
Author(s):  
Eirini Giovannopoulou ◽  
Anastasia Prodromidou ◽  
Nikolaos Blontzos ◽  
Christos Iavazzo
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Minimally Invasive Technique ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Robotic Myomectomy ◽  
The Mean

Objective. To review the existing studies on single-site robotic myomectomy and test the safety and feasibility of this innovative minimally invasive technique. Data Sources. PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar (from their inception to October 2019), as well as Clinicaltrials.gov databases up to April 2020. Methods of Study Selection. Clinical trials (prospective or retrospective) that reported the outcomes of single-site robotic myomectomy, with a sample of at least 20 patients were considered eligible for the review. Results. The present review was performed in accordance with the guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Four (4) studies met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 267 patients were included with a mean age from 37.1 to 39.1 years and BMI from 21.6 to 29.4 kg/m2. The mean operative time ranged from 131.4 to 154.2 min, the mean docking time from 5.1 to 5.45 min, and the mean blood loss from 57.9 to 182.62 ml. No intraoperative complications were observed, and a conversion rate of 3.8% was reported by a sole study. The overall postoperative complication rate was estimated at 2.2%, and the mean hospital stay ranged from 0.57 to 4.7 days. No significant differences were detected when single-site robotic myomectomy was compared to the multiport technique concerning operative time, blood loss, and total complication rate. Conclusion. Our findings support the safety of single-site robotic myomectomy and its equivalency with the multiport technique on the most studied outcomes. Further studies are needed to conclude on the optimal minimally invasive technique for myomectomy.

Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 513-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alongkorn Yanasoot ◽  
Kamtorn Yolsuriyanwong ◽  
Sakchai Ruangsin ◽  
Supparerk Laohawiriyakamol ◽  
Somkiat Sunpaweravong
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Open Esophagectomy

Background A minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy is being used increasingly, but concerns remain regarding the feasibility, safety, cost, and outcomes. We performed an analysis of the costs and benefits of minimally invasive, hybrid, and open esophagectomy approaches for esophageal cancer surgery. Methods The data of 83 consecutive patients who underwent a McKeown’s esophagectomy at Prince of Songkla University Hospital between January 2008 and December 2014 were analyzed. Open esophagectomy was performed in 54 patients, minimally invasive esophagectomy in 13, and hybrid esophagectomy in 16. There were no differences in patient characteristics among the 3 groups Minimally invasive esophagectomy was undertaken via a thoracoscopic-laparoscopic approach, hybrid esophagectomy via a thoracoscopic-laparotomy approach, and open esophagectomy by a thoracotomy-laparotomy approach. Results Minimally invasive esophagectomy required a longer operative time than hybrid or open esophagectomy ( p = 0.02), but these patients reported less postoperative pain ( p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in blood loss, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, or postoperative complications among the 3 groups. Minimally invasive esophagectomy incurred higher operative and surgical material costs than hybrid or open esophagectomy ( p = 0.01), but there were no significant differences in inpatient care and total hospital costs. Conclusion Minimally invasive esophagectomy resulted in the least postoperative pain but the greatest operative cost and longest operative time. Open esophagectomy was associated with the lowest operative cost and shortest operative time but the most postoperative pain. Hybrid esophagectomy had a shorter learning curve while sharing the advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Application Effect of High Tibial Osteotomy and Total Knee Replacement in Patients with Knee Arthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 4013-4020
Author(s):  
Bingtao Shi ◽  
Wentao Gao ◽  
Haifang Li
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Total Knee Replacement ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Tibial Osteotomy ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Knee Arthritis ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Better Than

Objective: To investigate the effects of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and total knee replacement (TKR) on postoperative pain of patients with knee arthritis. Methods: From February 2017 to March 2019, 72 patients with knee arthritis in our unit were collected for the experiment. Patients in the control group (CG, 35 cases) were treated with HTO, and research group (RG, 37 cases) were treated with TKR. Clinical efficacy. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. Knee Society Score (KSS), and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee rating score of the two groups of patients were observed. Intraoperative blood loss, operative time and hospitalization expenses were observed, as well as the effect of knee joint recovery after operation. Results: In terms of overall effective rate, RG was superior to CG (p < 0.05). VAS score of RG was notably lower at 1 week and 2 weeks after operation than that in CG (p < 0.05). KSS of RG was evidently higher than that of CG (p < 0.05). HSS score of RG was notably higher than that of CG after operation (p < 0.05). The intraoperative blood loss and operative time in RG were notably better than those in CG (p < 0.05). The effects of knee joint recovery in RG was considerably better than that in CG (p < 0.05). Conclusion: TKR has a better clinical effect on elderly patients, which can reduce postoperative pain, intraoperative blood loss and operative time, and improve the recovery effect of knee joint.

scholarly journals Transverse Versus Longitudinal Uterine Incision in Abdominal Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled trial

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Elguindy ◽  
H Hemeda ◽  
M Esmat ◽  
M Nawara ◽  
A M F Metwally
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Postoperative Fever ◽  
Abdominal Myomectomy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Uterine Incision ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objective The Aim of the study is to compare between transverse and longitudinal uterine incision in abdominal myomectomy regarding intraoperative blood loss Design: A randomized Controlled interventional study. Setting Ain Shams Maternity teaching hospital. Patients and methods 52 patients undergoing abdominal myomectomy for single myoma were involved The patients were randomized into two groups that showed no significant difference in demographic data, characters of myoma or indication of surgery Results Our results proved that there was no significant difference between both incisions regarding intra-operative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, post-operative Hgb drop, operative time or incidence of postoperative fever. Conclusion Transverse uterine incision for myomectomy does not cause more blood loss than longitudinal incision. There is no difference between both incisions in operative time or postoperative complications Trial identifier: NCT03009812, MY-789

scholarly journals Outcomes of Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Shrestha ◽  
Pukar Maskey
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Renal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽  
Stone Clearance ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Miniaturization of endoscopic instruments has gained wide popularity in the treatment of renal calculi. Retrograde intra-renal surgery and holmium laser in combination has already proven its superiority when compared to other modalities in the treatment of renal calculi. This study was conducted to assess the outcome of retrograde intra-renal surgery in renal stone disease.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the outcome of retrograde intra-renal surgery in renal stone less than 2 cm size in the adults above 18 years of age from September 2018 to August 2019 at Patan Hospital, Nepal. The outcome was assessed descriptively on postoperative pain and fever, stone localization, stone size, stone clearance, urosepsis, operative time, hospital stay, mortality, need of the second procedure.Results: A total of 62 patients underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery, out of which 48 cases were included. The mean age of the study population was 32.4± 14 years (19-68 years). Similarly, the mean operative time was 68± 12 (48-124 minutes) and mean hospital-stay was 3.2± 1.1 days. Postoperative pain and fever were observed in 14 (29.16%) & 4(8.33%) patients respectively. Hematuria occurred in 6(12.50%) and urosepsis in 2(4.16%) of the patients. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 34(70.83%) and residual stones were present in 8(16.66%) and clinically insignificant radiological fragments were present in 6(12.50%) patients.Conclusions: Retrograde intrarenal surgery is a technically safe and effective procedure for the treatment of renal calculi, with minimal post-surgical morbidity.

The Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Approach to Resection of Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms: An Underused Technique?

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62
Author(s):  
Lauren M. Postlewait ◽  
Cecilia G. Ethun ◽  
Mia R. Mcinnis ◽  
Nipun Merchant ◽  
Alexander Parikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Specimen Length ◽  
Cystic Neoplasms ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms

Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) are rare tumors typically of the distal pancreas that harbor malignant potential. Although resection is recommended, data are limited on optimal operative approaches to distal pancreatectomy for MCN. MCN resections (2000–2014; eight institutions) were included. Outcomes of minimally invasive and open MCN resections were compared. A total of 289 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy for MCN: 136(47%) minimally invasive and 153(53%) open. Minimally invasive procedures were associated with smaller MCN size (3.9 vs 6.8 cm; P = 0.001), lower operative blood loss (192 vs 392 mL; P = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay(5 vs 7 days; P = 0.001) compared with open. Despite higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, hand-assisted (n = 46) had similar advantages as laparoscopic/robotic (n = 76). When comparing hand-assisted to open, although MCN size was slightly smaller (4.1 vs 6.8 cm; P = 0.001), specimen length, operative time, and nodal yield were identical. Similar to laparoscopic/robotic, hand-assisted had lower operative blood loss (161 vs 392 mL; P = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (5 vs 7 days; P = 0.03) compared with open, without increased complications. Hand-assisted laparoscopic technique is a useful approach for MCN resection because specimen length, lymph node yield, operative time, and complication profiles are similar to open procedures, but it still offers the advantages of a minimally invasive approach. Hand-assisted laparoscopy should be considered as an alternative to open technique or as a successive step before converting from total laparoscopic to open distal pancreatectomy for MCN.

Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy: Almost a Decade of Experience at an Academic Center

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 949-952
Author(s):  
Ethan Frank ◽  
Joshua Park ◽  
Alfred Simental ◽  
Christopher Vuong ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Total Thyroidectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Vocal Cord Dysfunction ◽  
Completion Thyroidectomy ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Study Population

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has gained acceptance as an alternative to conventional thyroidectomy. This technique results in less bleeding, postoperative pain, shorter recovery time, and better cosmetic results without increasing morbidity. We retrospectively assessed outcomes in 583 patients having MIVAT from May 2005 to September 2014. The study population was divided into groups according to periods: 2005 to 2009 and 2010 to 2014. Operative data, complications, and length of stay were collected and compared. Total thyroidectomy was undertaken in 185, completion thyroidectomy in 49, and hemithyroidectomy in 349. Malignancy was present in 127 (21.8%). Mean incision was 3.4 ± 0.7 cm and estimated blood loss was 23.7 ± 21.7 mL. Mean operative time was 86.5 ± 39.3 minutes for all operations, 78.5 ± 37.0 minutes for hemithyroidectomy, 70.9 ± 30.1 minutes for completion thyroidectomy, and 106.8 ± 41.3 minutes for total thyroidectomy. Postoperatively, 56 (9.6%) had unilateral vocal cord dysfunction, which resolved except for one case (0.17%). Fifty-nine patients (10.1%) developed hypocalcemia, but only three cases (0.51%) became permanent. Only one patient required readmission. In conclusion, MIVAT results in short operative times, minimal blood loss, and few complications and is safely performed in an academic institution.

scholarly journals Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. E11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert P. Wong ◽  
Rishi R. Lall ◽  
Nader S. Dahdaleh ◽  
Cort D. Lawton ◽  
Zachary A. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Open Resection ◽  
Spine Tumors ◽  
Intradural Extramedullary

OBJECT Patients with symptomatic intradural-extramedullary (ID-EM) tumors may be successfully treated with resection of the lesion and decompression of associated neural structures. Studies of patients undergoing open resection of these tumors have reported high rates of gross-total resection (GTR) with minimal long-term neurological deficit. Case reports and small case series have suggested that these patients may be successfully treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). These studies have been limited by small patient populations. Moreover, there are no studies directly comparing perioperative outcomes between patients treated with open resection and MIS. The objective of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes in patients with ID-EM tumors treated using open resection or MIS. METHODS A retrospective review was performed using data collected from 45 consecutive patients treated by open resection or MIS for ID-EM spine tumors. These patients were treated over a 9-year period between April 2003 and October 2012 at Northwestern University and the University of Chicago. Statistical analysis was performed to compare perioperative outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS Of the 45 patients in the study, 27 were treated with the MIS approach and 18 were treated with the open approach. Operative time was similar between the two groups: 256.3 minutes in the MIS group versus 241.1 minutes in the open group (p = 0.55). Estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the MIS group (133.7 ml) compared with the open group (558.8 ml) (p < 0.01). A GTR was achieved in 94.4% of the open cases and 92.6% of the MIS cases (p = 0.81). The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the MIS group (3.9 days) compared with the open group (6.1 days) (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the complication rates (p = 0.32) and reoperation rates (p = 0.33) between the two groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an increased rate of complications in cervical spine tumors (OR 15, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Thoracolumbar ID-EM tumors may be safely and effectively treated with either the open approach or an MIS approach, with an equivalent rate of GTR, perioperative complication rate, and operative time. Patients treated with an MIS approach may benefit from a decrease in operative blood loss and shorter hospital stays.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document