scholarly journals KEUNGGULAN MANAJEMEN GAYA JEPANG, KOREA SELATAN, CINA, AMERIKA SERIKAT DAN INDONESIA SEBAGAI TOLAK UKUR PERSAINGAN BISNIS DI ERA GLOBALISASI

1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunandar Sunandar
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Organizational Culture ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Management Science ◽  
Management Style ◽  
Place Management ◽  
Work Activities ◽  
Science And Art ◽  
Science Management ◽  
Further Development

Management is the science and art. As a science, management has the general principles that are universal, but the art aspect of the application stage so that the color stands out overall managerial process. Hence the emergence of management style is a reflection of the adjustment application of the general principles of management of the environment in which the managerial process takes place. Management style in Japan, South Korea, China, United States and Indonesia have different advantages depending on factors such as the characteristics of employees, work activities involved in the organizational culture. In a further development excellence enrich the management style of management science it self

scholarly journals BIBLIOMETRIC OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH/MANAGEMENT SCIENCE RESEARCH IN ASIA

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (02) ◽  
pp. 217-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAO-LONG CHANG ◽  
PAO-NUAN HSIEH
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Hong Kong ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Operations Research ◽  
Science Research ◽  
The United States ◽  
Management Science ◽  
Research Management ◽  
Institute Of Technology ◽  
The Impact

This paper evaluates the distribution of papers published by Asian authors in Operations Research and Management Science (OR/MS) journals from 1968 to 2006. The impact of OR/MS research in Asia is compared with that of the United States and the World, and research trends are highlighted through an analysis of keywords. From 1968 to 2006, 89,293 papers were published in 60 OR/MS journals. Of these, 41.4% came from USA and 16.6% came from seven Asian countries/regions. The contribution of different countries/regions is as follows: Japan 3.7%, Taiwan 3.2%, India 2.3%, Hong Kong 2.2%, South Korea 2.1%, People's Republic of China (PRC) 1.9%, and Singapore 1.2%. Among all the articles analyzed, 20% have a single author, and 9% have more than three authors; additionally, 22 papers have been cited more than 100 times and 29% have never been cited. Most articles originating in Japan, Taiwan, India, South Korea, PRC, and Singapore are produced in collaboration with local scholars, followed by authors from the United States. Hong Kong is a notable exception, 73% of articles from Hong Kong are produced in cooperation with the PRC, followed by local scholars. The five most productive institutions are as follows: The Indian Institute of Technology, the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, the National University of Singapore, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, and the National Chiao-Tung University (Taiwan).

The Proximity of Other Skins

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celine Parreñas Shimizu
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
South Korea ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
The Other ◽  
The West ◽  
Pain And Suffering ◽  
The Spectator ◽  
Existing Frames ◽  
The Voice

Transnational films representing intimacy and inequality disrupt and disgust Western spectators. When wounded bodies within poverty entangle with healthy wealthy bodies in sex, romance and care, fear and hatred combine with desire and fetishism. Works from the Philippines, South Korea, and independents from the United States and France may not be made for the West and may not make use of Hollywood traditions. Rather, they demand recognition for the knowledge they produce beyond our existing frames. They challenge us to go beyond passive consumption, or introspection of ourselves as spectators, for they represent new ways of world-making we cannot unsee, unhear, or unfeel. The spectator is redirected to go beyond the rapture of consuming the other to the rupture that arises from witnessing pain and suffering. Self-displacement is what proximity to intimate inequality in cinema ultimately compels and demands so as to establish an ethical way of relating to others. In undoing the spectator, the voice of the transnational filmmaker emerges. Not only do we need to listen to filmmakers from outside Hollywood who unflinchingly engage the inexpressibility of difference, we need to make room for critics and theorists who prioritize the subjectivities of others. When the demographics of filmmakers and film scholars are not as diverse as its spectators, films narrow our worldviews. To recognize our culpability in the denigration of others unleashes the power of cinema. The unbearability of stories we don’t want to watch and don’t want to feel must be borne.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document