scholarly journals НАПРЯМИ ПОПЕРЕДЖЕННЯ НАУКОВОГО ПЛАГІАТУ

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 420-428
Author(s):  
Г. О. Ульянова
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Negative Consequences

Стаття привчена розгляду наукового плагіату. Зазначено, що науковий плагіат поля­гає у привласненні авторства на результати наукової діяльності, які є об'єктами права інтелектуальної власності. Визначено негативні наслідки наукового плагіату та напрями його попередження.   The article is devoted the scientific plagiarism. Scientific plagiarism consists in appropriation of authorship to the result of scientific activity, which is the object of the intellectual property rights. The negative consequences of scientific plagiarism and the basic directions of its warning are determined.

scholarly journals Features of intellectual property analysis in Ukraine and abroad

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 326-335
Author(s):  
S. Naumenko ◽  
L. Zolota
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Property Analysis ◽  
Negative State ◽  
Scientific Potential ◽  
Forensic Expert

Issues on the implementation of intellectual property analysis in Ukraine, as well as a forensic expert participation in court hearing abroad were considered. Intellectual property objects belong to a variety of types of art, science, technology and crafts, effective consideration of cases related to protection of intellectual property rights, for a complete and comprehensive study of the subject of examination and providing an expert's concusion becomes possible only in case of attracting specialists, who have special knowledge in a particular field. The article purpose is to define features of intellectual property analysis in Ukraine and formal requirements for a forensic expert in Ukraine and foreign states. One of the priority directions of state policy is the protection of intellectual property rights, as the development of this area stimulates innovation in all fields by increasing the country's economy to a new level, and providing it a rightful place at the international level. Also, an increase of scientific potential not only promotes Ukraine's modernization in various fields of science and technology but also increases its defense capability and national security. Today there is a negative state of compliance with the legislation regulating intellectual property issues, the number of violations of relevant rights is increasing. The reason for such a state is the imperfection of the mechanism of legal protection and protection of intellectual property rights in the field of scientific activity, failure to resolve the issue regarding legal protection of scientific advances, etc. In January 2020, the European Commission made a publication of a report on protection and ensuring intellectual property rights in third countries, according to which (despite all preventive measures) our country was already on the list of countries, where there are serious systematic problems in the field of defense and protection of intellectual rights, causing significant damage to the economic interests of the EU. Forensic science plays a priority role in introducing advanced achievements of science and technology and promotes the reliability of the proof system in the case. In some cases, the appointment and conduct of a forensic examination are not only necessary but also the only possible means of establishing the truth and solving a litigation.

scholarly journals Ways to eliminate inflections in teaching disciplines of intellectual property

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yurii Kuznetsov
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Polytechnic Institute ◽  
The Other ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Technical Creativity ◽  
History Of ◽  
Kyiv Polytechnic Institute

The history of introduction of disciplines devoted to the methodology of scientific and technical creativity, acquisition, protection, protection and commercialization of intellectual property rights in the Kyiv Polytechnic Institute (KPI) is presented chronologically. The positive and negative consequences of teaching disciplines in intellectual property and patent science are analyzed. Emphasis was placed on a strategic mistake when two disciplines (one legal, the other integrated engineering creative direction) merged into one and two teachers of two different departments of KPI began to teach.

Legal Nature of Results of Scientific Activities

2019 ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Dmitry Murzin
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Combined Application ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Protected Object

At present, social development as a whole is determined by the results of research activities. For this reason, it is important to identify the legal nature of the results of scientific activity. The aim of the article is to determine the boundaries of legal regulation of relations on creation and use of the results of scientific activity. The article analyzes the concept «the result of scientific activity» from the points of Russian legislation and civil law doctrine. The author discusses various options for improving legal regulation of civil law relations regarding the results of scientific activities from the standpoint of the correlation of such results with the protected object of intellectual property rights. These options range from expanding the circle of protected objects of intellectual property rights in the framework of the existing system to developing special absolute rights to the results of scientific activity. In some cases, the author refers to historical experience of the Russian law. It is concluded that identification of the legal nature of the results of scientific activity should be carried out with the combined application of all approaches de-scribed.

scholarly journals System of subjects of counteraction to infringement of the intellectual property right in the sphere of scientific activities

2020 ◽  
pp. 37-40
Author(s):  
L.V. Zolota
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Intellectual Property Right ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Scientific Institutions ◽  
Favorable Conditions

In this article involves a comprehensive analysis and generalization of existing scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of relevant conclusions the system of subjects of administrative and legal protection of intellectual property rights in the sphere of scientific activity. In the course of the research the system of subjects of administrative and legal protection of intellectual property rights in the sphere of scientific activity in Ukraine is defined, a number of public authorities belonging to general and special jurisdictions in this system have been clarified, after all, the state of observance of intellectual property rights in the field of scientific activity depends on the effectiveness of public authorities, one of the main tasks of which is the protection of such rights. As a result of the research, a number of new scientific theoretical and practical conclusions have been formulated with regard to subjects of administrative law, in particular, it is determined that they are potential subjects of administrative legal relations, as they may either enter into the relevant administrative legal relations or not exercise such a right, regarding the subjects of administrative and legal protection of intellectual property rights in the field of scientific activity, which are public authorities, international, national public organizations, scientific institutions, etc. whose activities are aimed at providing favorable conditions for the creation and use of intellectual property rights in the field of scientific activity. The provisions resulting from the research can be used in research, lawmaking, law enforcement activities – to improve the efficiency of protection of intellectual property rights in the field of scientific activity.

scholarly journals BATIK GEBLEK RENTENG KULON PROGO :

KOMUNITAS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-142
Author(s):  
Rahadiyand Aditya
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Community Empowerment ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Technology Knowledge ◽  
Industry Trade ◽  
Craft Community

Intellectual Property Rights is a wealth of all the products of the production of intelligence, such as technology, knowledge, art, literature, compositions of songs, written works, caricatures, etc. that are useful for humans. IPR management can have both positive and negative consequences. Therefore, researchers will see the results of community empowerment strategies through the management of intellectual property rights for local batik products together in Kulon Progo. Informants used qualitative research with informants using snowballs. Data collection techniques are done using observation, interviews and documentation. Interviews were conducted with Bappeda and the Kulon Progo Regency industry, trade and ESDM department and the batik craft community in Kulon Progo. The Geblek renteng batik motif is a typical batik motif from Kulon Progo. Secondly, only the Kulon Progo community is permitted to produce joint-style geblek batik motifs. Third, there may not be artisans using batik stamps or printing in the making of geblek renteng batik motifs, fourth, providing training and capital assistance for batik craftsmen in the Kulon Progo region.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KARYA SENI BATIK YANG BELUM TERDAFTAR MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inggrit Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Work Of Art

Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document