scholarly journals EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM KAMPUNG IKLIM (PROKLIM) DI DESA POLEONRO KECAMATAN LAMURU KABUPATEN BONE PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-64
Author(s):  
Sudarwanto Sudarwanto ◽  
Amir Tjoneng ◽  
Suriyanti Suriyanti
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Community Participation ◽  
Climate Change Adaptation ◽  
Climate Change Mitigation ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Group Activities ◽  
South Sulawesi ◽  
Activity Component ◽  
Collection Data ◽  
Change Mitigation

This study aims 1). Analyzing the effectiveness of the implementation of the Village Climate Program activities in Poleonro Village; 2). Analyzing the level of community participation in the implementation of the Climate Village Program in Poleonro Village; 3). Analyzing the relationship between the socio-economic factors of the community on the level of community participation in the Climate Village Program (PROKLIM) in Poleonro Village.The research was conducted in Poleonro Village, Lamuru District, Bone Regency, South Sulawesi Province. Field data collection, data processing, and analysis, as well as thesis preparation, took place from February to August 2020. The method used in this research was a descriptive method with interviews, questionnaires, observation, and documentation. Data analysis used a descriptive qualitative analysis and multiple linear regression.The results showed that the implementation of the Climate Village Program (PROKLIM) in Poleonro Village was classified as effective. This result according to the activity component of the Climate Village Program (PROKLIM) which had carried out climate change adaptation activities were 70.12%, climate change mitigation activities were 60.06%, and group activities of community and support for sustainability were 72.77%. The level of community participation in the implementation of the Climate Village Program (PROKLIM) activities in Poleonro Village for climate change adaptation, climate change mitigation, group activities of community and support for the sustainability of the level of participation was high. The level of education and counseling has a positive relationship with PROKLIM activities, while the variables age and income level have a negative relationship with the level of participation.

scholarly journals Opportunities and Challenges of Scaling up Agroforestry Practices in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamirat Wato ◽  
Mekides Amare
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Climate Change Adaptation ◽  
Global Climate Change ◽  
Climate Change Mitigation ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Scaling Up ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Change Mitigation ◽  
Agroforestry Practices

Agroforestry is land-use systems and technologies where woody perennials are deliberately used on equivalent land management units as crops and/or animals. Its systems combine tree growing with the assembly of different crops or animals. Hence, developing positive ecological and economic interactions between components, agroforestry systems aim to produce a variety of environmental, economic and social advantages to farming communities. It plays a major role in soil conservation and global climate change mitigation particularly due to its tree component. Trees control soil degradation through their roots and accumulate greenhouse emission (GHG) in their biomass. What is more, it conjointly helps in global climate change adaptation. It’s a long-time undeniable fact that despite our gift effort at global climate change mitigation (GHG reduction), there is an additional pressing ought to address the impact of global climate change (adaptation). Peoples ought to be acutely aware regarding the scope and advantages of agroforestry and that they ought to participate in the implementation and development of agroforestry within the country. Thus, this paper reviews different analysis findings on the opportunities and challenges for scaling up agroforestry practices. Therefore, the agroforestry system is economically and ecologically sound practices with an improvement of overall farm productivity, soil enrichment through litterfall, maintaining environmental services like international global climate change mitigation (carbon sequestration), phytoremediation, watershed protection and biodiversity conservation.

scholarly journals Can Nature-Based Solutions Deliver a Win-Win for Biodiversity and Climate Change Adaptation?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Key ◽  
Alison Smith ◽  
Beth Turner ◽  
Alexandre Chausson ◽  
Cécile Girardin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Climate Change Adaptation ◽  
Native Species ◽  
Ecosystem Health ◽  
Climate Change Mitigation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Local Species Richness ◽  
Mitigation And Adaptation ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Change Mitigation

Nature-based solutions (NbS) are increasingly recognised for their potential to address both the climate and biodiversity crises. These outcomes are interdependent, and both rely on the capacity of NbS to support and enhance the health of an ecosystem: its biodiversity, the condition of its abiotic and biotic elements, and its capacity to function normally despite environmental change. However, while understanding of ecosystem health outcomes of nature-based interventions for climate change mitigation is growing, the outcomes of those implemented for adaptation remain poorly understood with evidence scattered across multiple disciplines. To address this, we conducted a systematic review of the outcomes of 109 nature-based interventions for climate change adaptation using 33 indicators of ecosystem health across eight broad categories (e.g. diversity, biomass, ecosystem functioning and population dynamics). We showed that 88% of interventions with positive outcomes for climate change adaptation also reported measurable benefits for ecosystem health. We also showed that interventions were associated with a 67% average increase in local species richness. All eight studies that reported benefits in terms of both climate change mitigation and adaptation also supported ecosystem health, leading to a triple win. However, there were also trade-offs, mainly for forest management and creation of novel ecosystems such as monoculture plantations of non-native species. Our review highlights two major limitations of research to date. First, only a limited selection of metrics are used to assess ecosystem health and these rarely include key aspects such as functional diversity and habitat connectivity. Second, taxonomic coverage is poor: 67% of outcomes assessed only plants and 57% did not distinguish between native and non-native species. Future research addressing these issues will allow the design and adaptive management of NbS to support healthy and resilient ecosystems, and thereby enhance their effectiveness for meeting both climate and biodiversity targets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document