scholarly journals Does home oxygen therapy (HOT) in addition to standard care reduce disease severity and improve symptoms in people with chronic heart failure? A randomised trial of home oxygen therapy for patients with chronic heart failure

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (75) ◽  
pp. 1-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L Clark ◽  
Miriam Johnson ◽  
Caroline Fairhurst ◽  
David Torgerson ◽  
Sarah Cockayne ◽  
...  

BackgroundHome oxygen therapy (HOT) is commonly used for patients with severe chronic heart failure (CHF) who have intractable breathlessness. There is no trial evidence to support its use.ObjectivesTo detect whether or not there was a quality-of-life benefit from HOT given as long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) for at least 15 hours per day in the home, including overnight hours, compared with best medical therapy (BMT) in patients with severely symptomatic CHF.DesignA pragmatic, two-arm, randomised controlled trial recruiting patients with severe CHF. It included a linked qualitative substudy to assess the views of patients using home oxygen, and a free-standing substudy to assess the haemodynamic effects of acute oxygen administration.SettingHeart failure outpatient clinics in hospital or the community, in a range of urban and rural settings.ParticipantsPatients had to have heart failure from any aetiology, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV symptoms, at least moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and be receiving maximally tolerated medical management. Patients were excluded if they had had a cardiac resynchronisation therapy device implanted within the past 3 months, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease fulfilling the criteria for LTOT or malignant disease that would impair survival or were using a device or medication that would impede their ability to use LTOT.InterventionsPatients received BMT and were randomised (unblinded) to open-label LTOT, prescribed for 15 hours per day including overnight hours, or no oxygen therapy.Main outcome measuresThe primary end point was quality of life as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLwHF) questionnaire score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included assessing the effect of LTOT on patient symptoms and disease severity, and assessing its acceptability to patients and carers.ResultsBetween April 2012 and February 2014, 114 patients were randomised to receive either LTOT or BMT. The mean age was 72.3 years [standard deviation (SD) 11.3 years] and 70% were male. Ischaemic heart disease was the cause of heart failure in 84%; 95% were in NYHA class III; the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 27.8%; and the median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic hormone was 2203 ng/l. The primary analysis used a covariance pattern mixed model which included patients only if they provided data for all baseline covariates adjusted for in the model and outcome data for at least one post-randomisation time point (n = 102: intervention,n = 51; control,n = 51). There was no difference in the MLwHF questionnaire score at 6 months between the two arms [at baseline the mean score was 54.0 (SD 18.4) for LTOT and 54.0 (SD 17.9) for BMT; at 6 months the mean score was 48.1 (SD 18.5) for LTOT and 49.0 (SD 20.2) for BMT; adjusted mean difference –0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) –6.88 to 6.69;p = 0.98]. At 3 months, the adjusted mean MLwHF questionnaire score was lower in the LTOT group (–5.47, 95% CI –10.54 to –0.41;p = 0.03) and breathlessness scores improved, although the effect did not persist to 6 months. There was no effect of LTOT on any secondary measure. There was a greater number of deaths in the BMT arm (n = 12 vs.n = 6). Adherence was poor, with only 11% of patients reporting using the oxygen as prescribed.ConclusionsAlthough the study was significantly underpowered, HOT prescribed for 15 hours per day and subsequently used for a mean of 5.4 hours per day has no impact on quality of life as measured by the MLwHF questionnaire score at 6 months. Suggestions for future research include (1) a trial of patients with severe heart failure randomised to have emergency oxygen supply in the house, supplied by cylinders rather than an oxygen concentrator, powered to detect a reduction in admissions to hospital, and (2) a study of bed-bound patients with heart failure who are in the last few weeks of life, powered to detect changes in symptom severity.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN60260702.FundingThis project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 19, No. 75. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

2005 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Miani ◽  
Dario Gregori ◽  
Marco Ghidina ◽  
Patrizia Rozbowsky ◽  
Laura Pilotto ◽  
...  

Patients affected by heart failure have a compromised quality of life (QOL) and in the last few years “health related quality of life” has become an important outcome indicator for the evaluation of heart failure treatment. Methods: Translation into Italian of the Left Ventricular Dysfunction Questionnaire (LVD-36), a new, 36-item, disease-specific health status instrument for patients with congestive heart failure, and its subsequent validation by administration to 50 consecutive patients in our heart failure outpatient clinic. The Italian LVD-36 was compared to the “The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire” (MLHF). Results: The Italian version of the LVD-36 correlates well with MLHF for ejection fraction (EF), NYHA class I and II, etiology and therapy. Since, however, the LVD-36 has only one domain, it may be able to offer more synthetic information than MLHF about patients’ status. Conclusions: The Italian version of the LVD-36 appears to be a reliable instrument for assessing patients’ QOL and the degree of limitations imposed on them by the disease. It is short, clear and easy to complete. In patients with heart failure the LVD-36 correlates well with the MLHF and may be considered a new disease- specific instrument to estimate changes in health status, and an useful support in optimizing therapeutic options.


2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-287
Author(s):  
V. G. Tregubov ◽  
P. V. Khilkevich ◽  
I. Z. Shubitidze ◽  
V. M. Pokrovskii ◽  
N. V. Yukhnova

Objective. Compare the eff ect of combination therapy with nebivolol or carvedilol on the functional state of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and preserved ejection fraction (pEF) of the left ventricle (LV). Material and methods. The study involved 80 patients with diastolic CHF, who were randomized into two groups. In group I was appointed of nebivolol (7.7 ± 2.4 mg/day, n = 40), in group II — carvedilol (30.5 ± 8.7 mg/day, n = 40). As part of the combination therapy, quinapril was prescribed (13.7 ± 2.7 mg/day, n = 40 and 13.5 ± 2.6 mg/day, n = 40), and if indicated — atorvastatin (15.3 ± 4.6 mg/day, n = 17 and 16.2 ± 5.2 mg/day, n = 17) and acetylsalicylic acid in the intestinal soluble shell (96.4 ± 13.4 mg/day, n = 14 and 93.8 ± 13.3 mg/day, n = 13), respectively. Initially and after 6 months of therapy were carried out: quantitative assessment of regulatory-adaptive status (RAS) (by means of a sample of cardiac-respiratory synchronism), echocardioscopy, treadmill test, test with a six-minute walk, subjective assessment of quality of life, determination of the level of the N-terminal fragment of the brain natriuretic peptide in blood plasma, daily monitoring of blood pressure. Results. Both schemes of combined therapy comparably improved the structural and functional state of the heart, controlled arterial hypertension. In comparison with carvedilol, nebivolol diff ered positive eff ect on the RAS, more increased tolerance to physical activity and improved quality of life. Conclusion. In patients with CHF pEF LV in combination therapy, the use of nebivolol, in comparison with carvedilol, may be preferable due to the more pronounced positive eff ect on the functional state.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 795-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzan van der Meer ◽  
Marlies Zwerink ◽  
Marco van Brussel ◽  
Paul van der Valk ◽  
Elly Wajon ◽  
...  

Background: Advantages of outpatient exercise training are reduced waiting lists, better compliance, reduced time investment by the patient with reduced travel expenses, and less dependence on other people to participate. Therefore, this systematic review studies the effects of outpatient exercise training programmes compared with usual care on exercise capacity, exercise performance, quality of life, and safety in patients with chronic heart failure. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods: Randomized controlled trials concerning patients with chronic heart failure, with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, were included. A meta-analysis was performed. Results: Twenty-two studies were included. VO2max, 6-min walking test, and quality of life showed significant differences in favour of the intervention group of 1.85 ml/kg/min, 47.9 m, and 6.9 points, respectively. In none of the studies, a significant relationship was found between exercise training and adverse events. Conclusion: This meta-analysis illustrates the efficacy and safety of outpatient training programmes for patients with chronic heart failure.


2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (21) ◽  
pp. 2238-2244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus K.A. Witte ◽  
Nikolay P. Nikitin ◽  
Anita C. Parker ◽  
Stephan von Haehling ◽  
Hans-Dieter Volk ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 86-92
Author(s):  
V. G. Tregubov ◽  
P. V. Khilkevich ◽  
I. Z. Shubitidze ◽  
V. M. Pokrovsky

Objective. To determine the effect of bisoprolol or carvedilol therapy on the regulatory-adaptive status (RAS) of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and preserved ejection fraction (pEF) of the left ventricle (LV) the background of hypertensive disease (HD).Material and methods. The study involved 68 patients with CHF and pEF of the LV, who were randomized into two groups for treatment with bisoprolol (7,3±2,4 mg/day, n=34) and carvedilol (28,4±12,3 mg/day, n=34). As part of the combination therapy, quinapril was prescribed (13,5±2,5 mg/ day, n=34 and 12,6±2,9 mg/day, n=34), and if indicated – atorvastatin (16,3±5,0 mg/day, n=11 and 15,5±5,2 mg/day, n=11) and acetylsalicylic acid in the intestinal soluble shell (93,8±17,7 mg/day, n=8 and 94,4±15,8 mg/day, n=8), respectively. Initially and after 6 months of therapy were carried out: quantitative assessment of RAS (by means of a sample of cardiac-respiratory synchronism), treadmill test, six-minute walking test, subjective assessment of quality of life, determination of the level of N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide, echocardioscopy, daily monitoring of blood pressure.Results. Both regimens of combined drug therapy had comparable cardioprotective, hypotensive and neuromodulating effects, equally increased exercise tolerance. In comparison with bisoprolol, carvedilol differed positive impact on RAS, improved quality of life more.Conclusion. In patients with CHF and pEF LV in combination therapy, the use of carvedilol, in comparison with bisoprolol, may be preferable due to the positive effect on the RAS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document