scholarly journals The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for investigation of the knee joint

2001 ◽  
Vol 5 (27) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bryan ◽  
G. Weatherburn ◽  
H. Bungay ◽  
C. Hatrick ◽  
C. Salas ◽  
...  
1985 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 567-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton C. Weinstein

The purpose of this paper is to outline some of the key methodologic issues in designing clinical trials to assess the cost-effectiveness of clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Because the possible objectives of such trials are so diverse, and the appropriate methodologies correspondingly numerous, no attempt is made to identify a single objective or methodology as appropriate. Rather, this paper should be read as an “options paper,” in which alternative formulations of objectives, outcome measures, study design, and protocol instrumentation are reviewed, with critical discussion of their theoretical strengths and weaknesses, as well as their practical implementability.


Author(s):  
Alvin I. Mushlin ◽  
Cathleen Mooney ◽  
Robert G. Holloway ◽  
Allan S. Detsky ◽  
David H. Mattson ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective: To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in young adults presenting with equivocal neurological signs and symptoms. Designs and methods: A decision analysis of long-term survival using accuracy data from a diagnostic technology assessment of MRI and CT in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis, information from the medical literature, and clinical assumptions. Main results: In the baseline analysis, at 30% likelihood of an underlying neurologic disease, MRI use has an incremental cost of $101,670 for each additional quality-adjusted life-year saved compared with $20,290 for CT use. As the probability of disease increases, further MRI use becomes a cost-effective alternative costing $30,000 for each quality-adjusted life-year saved. If a negative MRI result provides reassurance, the incremental costs of immediate MRI use decreases and falls below $25,000 for each quality-adjusted life-year saved no matter the likelihood of disease. Conclusions: For most individuals with neurological symptoms or signs, CT imaging is cost-effective while MR imaging is not. The cost-effectiveness of MRI use, however, improves as the likelihood of an underlying neurological disease increases. For selected patients who highly value diagnostic information, MRI is a reasonable and cost-effective use of medical resources when even the likelihood of disease is quite low (5%).


Author(s):  
Sandeep P. Jogi ◽  
Rafeek Thaha ◽  
Sriram Rajan ◽  
Vidur Mahajan ◽  
Vasantha K. Venugopal ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (6) ◽  
pp. 650-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. T. Sheehan ◽  
F. E. Zajac ◽  
J. E. Drace

Improper patellar tracking is often considered to be the cause of patellar-femoral pain. Unfortunately, our knowledge of patellar-femoral-tibial (knee) joint kinematics is severely limited due to a lack of three-dimensional, noninvasive, in vivo measurement techniques. This study presents the first large-scale, dynamic, three-dimensional, noninvasive, in vivo study of nonimpaired knee joint kinematics during volitional leg extensions. Cine-phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure the velocity profiles of the patella, femur, and tibia in 18 unimpaired knees during leg extensions, resisted by a 34 N weight. Bone displacements were calculated through integration and then converted into three-dimensional orientation angles. We found that the patella displaced laterally, superiorly, and anteriorly as the knee extended. Further, patellar flexion lagged knee flexion, patellar tilt was variable, and patellar rotation was fairly constant throughout extension.


2021 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 109576
Author(s):  
Clemens G. Kaiser ◽  
Matthias Dietzel ◽  
Tibor Vag ◽  
Johannes Rübenthaler ◽  
Matthias F. Froelich ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document