Application of CIM Model created at the initial response for landslide disaster

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
Yoshiki WADA ◽  
Wataru TAKESHITA ◽  
Hiroyuki SUGIMOTO
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-138
Author(s):  
Samiha Haque ◽  
Ishrat Jahan ◽  
Tufayel Ahmed Chowdhury ◽  
Muhammad Abdur Rahim ◽  
Mehruba Alam Ananna ◽  
...  

Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis is one of the most dramatic and tragic presentations of lupus nephritis (LN) or renal manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A 35-year-old Bangladeshi gentleman presented with worsening oedema, scanty, high colored, frothy urine and deteriorating renal function. He had puffy face, anaemia, oedema, normal jugular venous pressure (JVP), high blood pressure (150/90 mm Hg), ascites and bilateral pleural effusions. Diagnostic work-up confirmed SLE with class IV LN. His initial response to specific therapy showed improvement Birdem Med J 2020; 10(2): 137-138


1974 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 647-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Rannevik ◽  
J. Thorell

ABSTRACT Eight amenorrhoeic women were given 100 μg synthetic LRH (Hoechst) iv and im, respectively, at an interval of 2 weeks. Four of the women received the iv injection first and four the im injection. The urinary excretion of oestrogens and pregnanediol was low and unaltered throughout the test weeks. The effects of LRH were compared by serial measurements of the plasma LH and FSH during 8 h. The initial response of LH for up to 25 min and that of FSH for up to 60 min were equal whether LRH was given iv or im. The difference appeared later. Four hours after the injection the mean increase of LH to iv injection was 0.5 ng/ml (N. S.), while that to im injection was 1.9 ng/ml (P < 0.01). The corresponding values for FSH were 1.3 (P < 0.05) and 3.2 (P < 0.001). The effect of LRH administration im was thus found to be larger and more prolonged.


2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (Special_Supplement) ◽  
pp. 185-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy E. Alpert ◽  
Chung T. Chung ◽  
Lisa T. Mitchell ◽  
Charles J. Hodge ◽  
Craig T. Montgomery ◽  
...  

Object. The authors sought to evaluate the initial response of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) to gamma knife surgery (GKS) based on the number of shots delivered and radiation dose. Methods. Between September 1998 and September 2003, some 63 patients with TN refractory to medical or surgical management underwent GKS at Upstate Medical University. Ten patients had multiple sclerosis and 25 patients had undergone prior invasive treatment. Gamma knife surgery was delivered to the trigeminal nerve root entry zone in one shot in 27 patients or two shots in 36 patients. The radiation dose was escalated to less than or equal to 80 Gy in 20 patients, 85 Gy in 21 patients, and greater than or equal to 90 Gy in 22 patients. Pain before and after GKS was assessed using the Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Scale and the improvement score was analyzed as a function of dose grouping and number of shots. Sixty patients were available for evaluation, with an initial overall and complete response rate of 90% and 27%, respectively. There was a greater improvement score for patients who were treated with two shots compared with one shot, mean 2.83 compared with 1.72 (p < 0.001). There was an increased improvement in score at each dose escalation level: less than or equal to 80 Gy (p = 0.017), 85 Gy (p < 0.001), and greater than or equal to 90 Gy (p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis also indicated that there was a greater response with an increased dose (p = 0.021). Patients treated with two shots were more likely to receive a higher dose (p < 0.001). There were no severe complications. Five patients developed mild facial numbness. Conclusions. Gamma knife surgery is an effective therapy for TN. Initial response rates appear to correlate with the number of shots and dose.


Author(s):  
Carrie Figdor

Chapter 4 elaborates and provides an initial defense of Literalism. Updated versions of the inference to the best explanation argument for other minds provide a familiar framework for thinking about the plausibility of Literalism, as well as an additional argument for it as the default interpretation of the predicates as they are used in contemporary science. The chapter articulates what Literalism does not claim and what would falsify it. It also presents a series of initial objections to Literalism by means of a dialogue between the Literalist and an imaginary interlocutor, the Implicit Scare Quoter. The ISQ represents the broad range of intuitive objections to Literalism that follow from the initial response that the uses involve implicit scare quotes, indicating an implicit difference in meaning. The dialogue shows the strength of the Literal position in response to common objections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document