Strain localization patterns of cohesive soil with controlled microfabric under cyclic loading using DIA technique

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajanta Sachan
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (18) ◽  
pp. 3821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Głuchowski ◽  
Emil Soból ◽  
Alojzy Szymański ◽  
Wojciech Sas

Cohesive soils subjected to cyclic loading in undrained conditions respond with pore pressure generation and plastic strain accumulation. The article focus on the pore pressure development of soils tested in isotropic and anisotropic consolidation conditions. Due to the consolidation differences, soil response to cyclic loading is also different. Analysis of the cyclic triaxial test results in terms of pore pressure development produces some indication of the relevant mechanisms at the particulate level. Test results show that the greater susceptibility to accumulate the plastic strain of cohesive soil during cyclic loading is connected with the pore pressure generation pattern. The value of excess pore pressure required to soil sample failure differs as a consequence of different consolidation pressure and anisotropic stress state. Effective stresses and pore pressures are the main factors that govern the soil behavior in undrained conditions. Therefore, the pore pressure generated in the first few cycles plays a key role in the accumulation of plastic strains and constitutes the major amount of excess pore water pressure. Soil samples consolidated in the anisotropic and isotropic stress state behave differently responding differently to cyclic loading. This difference may impact on test results analysis and hence may change the view on soil behavior. The results of tests on isotropically and anisotropically consolidated soil samples are discussed in this paper in order to point out the main features of the cohesive soil behavior.


2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 1289-1309 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Stinville ◽  
M. P. Echlin ◽  
P. G. Callahan ◽  
V. M. Miller ◽  
D. Texier ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 419-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Martínez ◽  
Hernán Patiño ◽  
Rubén Galindo

Author(s):  
Wojciech Sas ◽  
Andrzej Głuchowski ◽  
Maciej Miturski

Abstract In this article the cyclic CBR test as a reference method in determination of resilient modulus (Mr) is confronted with results of cyclic triaxial and unconfined uniaxial cyclic test. The main idea of conducted experiments is establish relationship between cyclic loading tests in testing of natural subsoil and road materials. The article shows results of investigation on cohesive soil, namely sandy silty clay, commonly problematic soil in Poland. The results of repeated loading triaxial test resilient modulus were displayed in order to compare them with cyclic CBR test results by using the Mr–Ө model. Some empirical correlation between factors obtained from triaxial test or uniaxial unconfined cyclic test and cyclic CBR test was introduced here. The behavior of resilient modulus was also examined in this paper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document