scholarly journals A Comparative Study between Single Dose of Ceftriaxone, Metronidazole and Gentamicine as a Prophylaxis versus Conventional Dose Antibiotic in Hysterectomy in BSMMU

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-152
Author(s):  
Salma Akter Munmun ◽  
Rowson Ara ◽  
Shiuly Chowdhury ◽  
Mst. Manjumun Ara Sarkar ◽  
Saleha Begum Chowdhury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Conventional Dose ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Clinical Records ◽  
Operative Wound

A prospective study was done in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, BSMMU, Dhaka from January 2006 to December 2006. Hundred cases were studied during this period. The patients admitted for hysterectomy operation were divided into group A and group B. In group A 50 patients received prophylactic injectable 1 gm ceftriaxone, 500 mg metronidazole and 80 mg gentamicine one hour before operation. In group B 50 patients received conventional antibiotic comprising ciprofloxacin for 7 days (both I.V and Oral), metronidazole for 5 days (both I.V and oral) and gentamicine for 3 days (I.V / I.M). After fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria the patients were randomly assigned to receive either parenteral loading dose of 1 gm Ceftriaxone, 500 mg Metronidazole and 80 mg Gentamicine (Group-A) pre-operatively or conventional dose of antibiotic (Group- B). Relevant careful clinical records and data were kept on predesigned proforma. Incidence of post-operative complications, operative time and hospital stay were recorded for each patient. Data was analyzed using SPSS program with the consultation of the statistician. Because of nature of the analysis, only chi-squire(X2) test was applied. Most of the patients (64% in Group-A and 67% in Group-B) were from low socio-economic class. Significant number of patients were anaemic (Hb% between 50-55%) and duration of operation was within 60-89 minutes in most of the cases. There were 3(6%) post operative wound infection in Group- A and 2(4%) post operative wound infection in Group-B after abdominal hysterectomy. 1 patient of Group-A and 1 patient of Group-B developed wound infection after vaginal hysterectomy operation. So, there was no significant difference in post-operative wound infection between Group- A and Group-B. Length of post-operative hospital stays in both groups were within 5-9 days (Group-A 90% and Group- B 92%). The study demonstrates that there is no significant difference regarding surgical outcome between Group-A and Group-B. Moreover the patient of Group-A needs antibiotic cost only Tk. 220 and Group-B needs of about Tk. 640, so that it saves about Tk. 420 which supports the economic benefits for Group-A and cost effectiveness.J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2014; 32: 149-152

scholarly journals Prophylactic temporary abdominal aortic balloon occlusion for patients with pernicious placenta previa: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Huo ◽  
Hansheng Liang ◽  
Yi Feng
Keyword(s):  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Artery Embolism ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Clinical Records ◽  
Group D ◽  
Central Placenta Previa

Abstract Background Pernicious placenta previa (PPP) can increase the risk of perioperative complications. During caesarean section in patients with adherent placenta, intraoperative blood loss, hysterectomy rate and transfusion could be reduced by interventional methods. Our study aimed to investigate the influence of maternal hemodynamics control and neonatal outcomes of prophylactic temporary abdominal aortic balloon (PTAAB) occlusion for patients with pernicious placenta previa. Methods This was a retrospective study using data from the Peking University People’s Hospital from January 2014 through January 2020. Clinical records of pregnant women undergoing cesarean section were collected. Patients were divided into two groups: treatment with PTAAB placement (group A) and no balloon placement (group B). Group A was further broken down into two groups: prophylactic placement (Group C) and balloon occlusion (group D). Results Clinical records of 33 cases from 5205 pregnant women underwent cesarean section were collected. The number of groups A, B, C, and D were 17, 16, 5 and 12.We found that a significant difference in the post-operative uterine artery embolism rates between group A and group B (0% vs.31.3%, p = 0.018). There was a significant difference in the Apgar scores at first minute between group A and group B (8.94 ± 1.43 vs 9.81 ± 0.75,p = 0.037),and the same significant difference between two groups in the pre-operative central placenta previa (29.4% vs. 0%,p = 0.044), complete placenta previa (58.8% vs 18.8%, p = 0.032),placenta implantation (76.5% vs 31.3%, p = 0.015). We could also observe the significant difference in the amount of blood cell (2.80 ± 2.68vs.10.66 ± 11.97, p = 0.038) and blood plasma transfusion (280.00 ± 268.32 vs. 1033.33 ± 1098.20, p = 0.044) between group C and group D. The significant differences in the preoperative vaginal bleeding conditions (0% vs 75%, p = 0.009), the intraoperative application rates of vasopressors (0% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.044) and the postoperative ICU (intensive care unit) admission rates (0% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.044) were also kept. Conclusions PTAAB occlusion could be useful in reducing the rate of post-operative uterine artery embolism and the amount of transfusion, and be useful in coping with patients with preoperative vaginal bleeding conditions, so as to reduce the rate of intraoperative applications of vasopressors and the postoperative ICU (intensive care unit) admission. In PPP patients with placenta implantation, central placenta previa and complete placenta previa, we advocate the utilization of prophylactic temporary abdominal aortic balloon placement.

scholarly journals Comparison between scalpel incision and electrocautery incision in midline abdominal surgery: a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507
Author(s):  
Amit Yadav ◽  
Lakshman Agarwal ◽  
Sumit A. Jain ◽  
Sanjay Kumawat ◽  
Sandeep Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
P Value ◽  
Wound Area ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Fear of poor wound healing have curtailed the use of diathermy for making skin incision. Scalpel produces little damage to surrounding tissue but causing more blood loss. Our aim of study was to compare electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in terms of incision time, blood loss, postoperative pain and wound infection.Methods: Total of 104 patients were included in the study undergoing midline abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized into electrocautery (group A) and scalpel (group B). The incision dimension, incision time and blood loss were noted intraoperatively. Postoperative pain was noted on postoperative day 2 using visual analog scale. Wound complications were recorded on every postoperative day till the patient was discharged.Results: 52 patients in each of the two groups were analyzed. There was significant difference found between group A and group B in terms of mean incision time per unit wound area, 8.16±1.59 s\cm2 and 11.02±1.72 s\cm2 respectively (p value=0.0001). The mean blood loss per unit wound area was found to be significantly lower in group A (0.31±0.04 ml\cm2) as compared to group B (1.21±0.21), p value=0.0001. There was no significant difference noted in terms of postoperative pain and wound infection between both groups.Conclusions: Electrocautery can be considered safe in making skin incision in midline laparotomy compared to scalpel incision with comparable postoperative pain and wound infection with less intraoperative blood loss and less time consuming.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Efficiency between Povidone Iodine and Normal Saline Lavage in the Treatment of Acute Peritonitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Haridas Saha ◽  
Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil ◽  
Aminul Islam ◽  
Abdullah Al Mamun ◽  
Md Margub Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Acute Peritonitis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Saline Lavage

Background: Control of the primary site of sepsis is the main determinant of good surgical outcome. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficiency between povidone iodine and normal saline lavage in the treatment of acute peritonitis. Methodology: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the Department of Surgery at Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Patients with acute peritonitis due to gastrointestinal causes who were admitted in the different units of Dhaka Medical College Hospital during the study period were selected as study population. Among them patients who were treated with povidone iodine were enrolled in the present study in group A and patients who were treated with conventional normal saline were in group B. Results: A total number of 1050 patients were recruited for this study. Among them 100 patients were enrolled in the present study of which group A (50 patients) for povidone iodine and group B (50 patients) for conventional normal saline. On 7th POD wound infection was found in Group A and Group B were 11(22.4%) and 21(44.7%) respectively. Statistically significant difference in post operative complication of wound infection was observed on 7th POD between the groups (p<0.05). Post operative hospital stay in Group A and Group B were 11.50 ± 4.48 and 13.46 ± 5.13 days respectively. There is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Statistically significant difference observed in post operative complication of wound infection and burst abdomen on 7th POD between the groups. The present study there is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups also observed. Bangladesh Journal of Infectious Diseases 2017;4(1):15-20

The Effect of Combined Clopidogrel and Aspirin Therapy after Off-Pump Coronary Surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 265-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emir Mujanovic ◽  
Midhat Nurkic ◽  
Jasmin Caluk ◽  
Ibrahim Terzic ◽  
Emir Kabil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Graft Patency ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective The purpose of this randomized study was to evaluate the effect on graft patency by adding clopidogrel to aspirin in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting and the possible side effects of such therapy. Methods Twenty patients who underwent standard OPCAB through median sternotomy were randomized immediately after surgery in two groups. Patients in group A (n = 10) received 100 mg of aspirin starting preoperatively, continuing indefinitely. Patients in group B received 100 mg of aspirin and, in addition, 75 mg of clopidogrel starting immediately after the operation and for 3 months. Postoperative bleeding and other perioperative parameters were compared. Angiography was repeated 3 months after surgery to determine the patency and quality of grafts. Results Preoperative risk factors were similar in the two groups. There was no significant difference in average number of distal anastomosis (P = 0.572), operation time (P = 0.686), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.256), ventilation time (P = 0.635), and intensive care unit stay (P = 0.065). Length of stay was shorter in group B (P = 0.024). There was no postoperative complication in either groups. Eight of 27 grafts in group A and 2 of 29 grafts in group B (P = 0.037) were occluded at the time of control angiography. Conclusions Early administration of a combined regimen of clopidogrel and aspirin after OPCAB grafting is not associated with increased postoperative bleeding or other major complications. Despite the small number of patients in this study and small number of examined grafts, the results suggest that the addition of clopidogrel may increase graft patency after OPCAB grafting.

scholarly journals 1379. Comparison of Inpatient Tuberculosis Screening Methods and Their Effect on Patient Duration in Airborne Isolation

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S501-S501
Author(s):  
Mary Katherine. Theoktisto ◽  
Delvina Ford ◽  
Omar Khan ◽  
Kelly R Reveles ◽  
Jose Cadena
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Smear Microscopy ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Crude Analysis

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant public health concern, and exposure in healthcare settings is prevalent. Current guidelines recommend testing for TB by acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy with 3 sputum samples and/or using nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), and mycobacterium culture. The purpose of this project is to compare how different TB diagnostic tests affect the duration of stay in respiratory isolation. Methods This study was conducted at the Veteran Affairs South Texas hospital, which includes a total of 437 beds. Data were collected retrospectively from medical records. Eligibility included patients admitted to the hospital and placed in airborne isolation for TB screening and diagnosis, had 3 sputum samples collected 8 hours apart and/or had 2 PCR MTB/RIF. Patients were excluded if they had TB or were not undergoing evaluation for TB. Three time periods analyzed included, 3 AFB sputum samples analyzed in-house from December 2012 to January 2014 (Group A), 3 AFB sputum samples analyzed at outside facility during 2013 to 2014 as well as 2 months in 2012 (Group B), and 2 MTB PCR/RIF in house during 2017 and 2018 (Group C). Duration of isolation was compared between groups using the Kruskal–Wallis test. A total number of 815 patients were screened, leaving 105 patients for analysis after exclusion. There were 49 patients analyzed from Group A, 28 from Group B, and 28 from Group C. Results Crude analysis of the data showed numerical differences in the total number of days and hours in isolation between the 3 groups. The average (mean) days in isolation were 4.2 for Group A, 7.4 for Group B, and 5.5 for Group C. There was no statistically significant difference in either days or hours of airborne precautions by “rule out” method. Days of isolation in airborne precautions (median IQR) was 4 for all groups (P = 0.3313). Likewise, hours of airborne precautions had a median IQR of 96 for all groups P = 0.4347. Conclusion Although there was no statistical significance between the groups, crude analysis did show a numerical difference in the mean total airborne days and hours. Lack of statistical difference may be due to low number of patients, timing of order placement for in-house PCR, and longer than expected stay in airborne precautions. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Comparison of Alveolar Osteitis (AO) occurrence after impacted mandibular third molar removal with and without post-extraction socket irrigation

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-215
Author(s):  
Fatema Awan ◽  
Manahil Rahat ◽  
Muhammad Jamal ◽  
Saniya Sohail ◽  
Khalid Mahmood Siddiqi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Third Molar ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Dry Socket ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Mandibular Molar ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Alveolar Osteitis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Objective: We wanted to see whether impacted third mandibular molar extractions resulted in Alveolar Osteitis if post-extraction socket irrigation was used or not. Methodology: A randomized control experiment on 70 patients study was conducted from July 2019 to January 2020 at Islamabad Dental Hospital's OMFS department. Patients presenting with the mandibular third molars fulfilling the inclusion criteria had their teeth extracted with and without socket irrigation using the computer lottery method. In cases of dry socket, clinical diagnosis was made between the 3rd, 5th, and 7th postoperative days. Results: 70 patients/sockets were evaluated with 35 having been irrigated and 35 non-irrigated. The age range was 16-50years with a mean of 29.49 and most patients were between the 16-35 age group. There were 48.6% males and 51.4% females. Dry Socket was evaluated on the 3rd, 5th, and 7th day between groups (A=irrigation, B=Non-irrigation). On the 3rd postop day, 14 (40%) patients in group A and 15(42.9%) patients were diagnosed as dry Sockets. A similar number of patients in both groups (20%) exhibited symptoms of dry socket on the fifth and seventh postoperative days, as did 5 (14.3 %) in group A, 3 (8.6 %) in group B, and 1(2.9 %t) in group A, all on the fifth postoperative day. Conclusion: On the third, fifth, and seventh postoperative days, there was no significant difference in the result of Alveolar Osteitis between the groups.

scholarly journals Comparison of the inner side and two-sided approaches for iliac crest bone graft harvesting for pediatric pelvic osteotomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Chen ◽  
Kai Chen ◽  
Yuxi Su
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Iliac Crest ◽  
Pelvic Osteotomy ◽  
Outer Side ◽  
Iliac Crest Bone Graft ◽  
Exposure Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Clinical Records

Abstract Background The iliac crest is one of the most used bone graft sources. In this study, we aimed to identify the effects of inner side and two-sided approaches for iliac crest bone harvesting on post-surgery ilium growth in children. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed 47 patients who underwent pelvic osteotomy and iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) procedures from January 2015 to September 2018. The patients were divided into an inner table ilium exposure group (group A) and the inner-outer table ilium exposure group (group B) and were followed up with radiography in postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12, and the growth areas were measured using PACS software. Complications such as damage to the arteries or nerves, ureteral injury, gastrointestinal hernia, ileus, abnormal cosmetic appearance, sensory disturbances, and functional limitations were recorded based on clinical records. Results There were 22 patients aged 5.3±1.5 years in group A and 25 patients aged 5.9±1.8 years in group B. There were no significant differences in demographics between the two groups, or in growth in the first month. However, bone graft growth at months 3, 6, and 12 was significantly better in group A than in group B. There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups. Conclusion Exposure of only the inner table of the ilium resulted in faster recovery of the bone defect than two-sided exposure in pelvic osteotomy. Therefore, we suggest protecting the outer side of the ilium during surgery. Level of evidence Level III

scholarly journals Outcome of thyroid lobectomies undergone with and without drains

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 2919
Author(s):  
Sahrish Bachani ◽  
Shahid N. Memon ◽  
Muhammad R. Pathan ◽  
Rehmat Sehrish Shah ◽  
Aneeta Kumari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Thyroid Lobectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Thyroid lobectomy is a common operative technique of management of benign solitary thyroid nodules in which drains are used routinely. Objective of this study to compare the outcome of thyroid lobectomies undergone with and without drains in patients of benign solitary thyroid nodules.Methods: A comparative cross-sectional research was completed on 98 patients of benign solitary thyroid nodules at surgery department of Liaquat University Hospital Jamshoro. Patients having age of 18-60 years underwent thyroid lobectomies were included and distributed in two groups A and B. Group A includes thyroid lobectomies with drain and Group B without drain. Postoperative outcomes including pain score assessed via visual analog score (VAS), hospital stay and complications including wound infection, seroma and hematoma.Results: Out of 98 cases, 49 underwent thyroid lobectomy with drain and 49 without a drain. Females patients were in majority in group A 42 (85.7%) and also in group B 47 (95.9%). No significant difference (p-value=0.674) was in mean age of group A 30.8±10.2 years and group B 31.8±12.2 years. Higher mean with significant difference (p-value=0.001) was in pain score of group A 5.61±1.25 as compared to group B 3.55±0.70. No significant difference was in complications; seroma 1 (2.04%) vs 5 (10.20%), hematoma 1 (2.04%) vs 1 (2.04%) and infection 3 (6.12%) vs 0 (0.0%) in group A and B respectively. Higher mean with significant difference (p-value=0.001) was in hospital stay of group A 2.40±1.57 days as compared to group B 1.42±0.54 days. No significant difference (p-value=0.748) was in overall rate of complications in group A 5 (10.20%) and B 6 (12.24%).Conclusions: Thyroid lobectomy with drain is not effective in lowering the postoperative complications whereas enhanced the risk of postoperative pain, wound infection and duration of hospital stay as compared to thyroid lobectomy without a drain.

scholarly journals Comparison of Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine as Intrathecal Adjuvants to Spinal Anaesthesia for Abdominal Hysterectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (213) ◽  
pp. 848-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binod Gautam ◽  
Sushila Tabdar ◽  
Ujma Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Spinal anaesthesia, although advantageous for conducting abdominal hysterectomy, is not the first choice amongst surgeons for fear of intra-operative visceral pain. Intrathecal adjuvants may improve quality of spinal anaesthesia. This study aims to compare efficacy of intrathecal Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine to reduce visceral pain during abdominal hysterectomy performed under spinal anaesthesia. Methods: Sixty women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy for benign indications were randomly assigned to two equal groups in a double-blind fashion. Fentanyl 25 micrograms in group A or Dexmedetomidine 10 micrograms in group B was co-administered with hyperbaric Bupivacaine 15 milligrams for spinal anesthesia. Surgery through Pfannenstiel incision proceeded once sensory block reached eighth thoracic dermatome. The intra-operative visceral pain was assessed using a five-point scale: none, mild, intermediate, severe, and failed spinal anaesthesia. Duration of analgesia and peri-operative events were studied for 24 hours. Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Student’s t-test were used for analysis. Level of significance used was P<0.05. Results: Fifty eight participants completed the study. Demographic variables and sensory block were similar between groups. General anaesthesia was not required in both groups. Significantly greater number of patients in group A required medications for visceral pain with Relative Risk of 2.8 (1.16-6.7). Pruritus and shivering occurred significantly higher in group A. Hypotension was significantly higher in group B. Post-operatively, group B patients showed a significantly longer duration of analgesia. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine is better than Fentanyl as an intrathecal adjuvant to spinal anaesthesia in minimizing visceral pain during abdominal hysterectomy and in prolonging post-operative analgesia.

scholarly journals A comparative study of inguinal hernia repair: Shouldice versus Lichtenstein repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 2238
Author(s):  
Ram Sagar Shah ◽  
Ajay Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Lichtenstein Repair ◽  
Shouldice Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Inguinal hernia is a common problem and its repair is one of the most frequently performed operation in general surgical practice. There are appreciable advantages of Lichtenstein over Shouldice repair in terms of simplicity, less time consuming and postoperative pain; there in the context of less developed countries with limited economic resources, however Shouldice repair is more cost effective and there are no differences in recurrences and other complications which would be a better proposition. The present study aims at comparing the results of Shouldice versus Lichtenstein’s repair in inguinal hernia in adult male (≥18 years).Methods: Total of fifty cases was included in this study, were equally divided into 2 groups; Group A and Group B and subjected for Shouldice and Lichtenstein mesh repair respectively. Operating time, postoperative complications as Wound infection, Seroma, Hematoma, Postoperative pain, and days of hospital stay, total costs and time to return to usual activity was noted.Results: Out of 50 patients, 36 (72%) were had indirect hernia and most of them were in between 18-29.9 years of age. There were no difference between two groups with respect to postoperative pain, Wound infection 12% and 8%, Seroma  8% and 4% and Hematoma 4% and 4% in Group A and Group B respectively. However, there is significant difference noted in operating time period in which Shouldice repair took more time (Mean time in Shouldice 84.16 min and Lichtenstein 58.80 min). There were no recurrences in either group.Conclusions: So, comparing our results of both groups, Lichtenstein repair were found to be better as it is simple procedure and is less time consuming than Shouldice repair.  However, Shouldice repair was found to be cost effective which could be an important consideration in developing countries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document