scholarly journals Presentation and Management of Hepatic Injury due to Blunt Trauma in Patients Attending in Casualty Block of DMCH - A Study of 50 Cases

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman Chowdhury ◽  
SM Amjad Hossain ◽  
Salma Sultana ◽  
Rifat Zaman ◽  
Md Alauddin ◽  
...  

Objective: To diagnose the cases of hepatic injury due to blunt abdominal trauma in a shortest possible time and find out the way of efficient and planned management of hepatic injury in our present setting. Materials and methods: This study was done in the casualty department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital and 50 patients of hepatic injury following blunt abdominal trauma were selected over a period of January 2010 to December 2010. All 50 patients were admitted within 24 hours of incidence. The patients were diagnosed clinically by history and physical examination and relevant investigations. Immediately after admission patients were resuscitated by clearance of airway, maintenance of respiration, arrest of external bleeding and maintenance of normal circulation (ATLS Protocol). After resuscitation further management was planned depending upon the condition of the patient. Clinical presentation, overall management and outcome were evaluated by the available resources of casualty ward of DMCH. Results: Most patients were male (88%) and 68% of patients were belonged to age group of 21 to 40 years. Most of the patients (90%) were injured as a result of road traffic accidents. All patients had a history of trauma and most of them presented with abdominal pain, tenderness muscular rigidity of abdomen and shock (38%). Only 13 (26%) patients had isolated hepatic injury. Rest of the patients had associated other organ injuries. Majority patients (46%) had Grade-I hepatic injury. Out of 50 patients, 46 were operated and most of them had other intra abdominal organ injuries and 4 patients were given non-operative management. Suture hepatorrhaphy was done in 38 (76%) cases. Most common post operative complications were pulmonary in origin (24%) and three patients were died in this series. Conclusion: Simple technique of hemostasis such as suture hepatorrhaphy is sufficient in most cases with adequate drainage and non operative management can be tried based on haemodynamic stability. J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 27, No.1, April, 2018, Page 57-61

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-137
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman Chowdhury ◽  
SM Amjad Hossain ◽  
Salma Sultana ◽  
Rifat Zaman ◽  
Md Alauddin ◽  
...  

Objective: To diagnose the cases of hepatic injury due to blunt abdominal trauma in a shortest possible time and find out the way of efficient and planned management of hepatic injury in our present setting.Materials and methods: This study was done in the casualty department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital and 50 patients of hepatic injury following blunt abdominal trauma were selected over a period of January 2010 to December 2010. All 50 patients were admitted within 24 hours of incidence. The patients were diagnosed clinically by history and physical examination and relevant investigations. Immediately after admission patients were resuscitated by clearance of airway, maintenance of respiration, arrest of external bleeding and maintenance of normal circulation (ATLS Protocol). After resuscitation further management was planned depending upon the condition of the patient. Clinical presentation, overall management and outcome were evaluated by the available resources of casualty ward of DMCH.Results: Most patients were male (88%) and 68% of patients were belonged to age group of 21 to 40 years. Most of the patients (90%) were injured as a result of road traffic accidents. All patients had a history of trauma and most of them presented with abdominal pain, tenderness muscular rigidity of abdomen and shock (38%). Only 13 (26%) patients had isolated hepatic injury. Rest of the patients had associated other organ injuries. Majority patients (46%) had Grade-I hepatic injury. Out of 50 patients, 46 were operated and most of them had other intra abdominal organ injuries and 4 patients were given non-operative management. Suture hepatorrhaphy was done in 38 (76%) cases. Most common post operative complications were pulmonary in origin (24%) and three patients were died in this series.Conclusion: Simple technique of hemostasis such as suture hepatorrhaphy is sufficient in most cases with adequate drainage and non operative management can be tried based on haemodynamic stability.J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 25, No.2, October, 2016, Page 133-137


Author(s):  
Deepak Singh Panwar ◽  
Ashok Kumar

Background: In view of increasing number of vehicles and consequently road traffic accidents, this dissertation has been chosen to study the cases of blunt abdominal trauma with reference to the patients presenting at P.B.M. hospital, attached to S.P. Medical College, Bikaner. Methods: Prospective hospital-based study was conducted on all the patients of blunt abdominal injury admitted in the department of surgery, S.P. Medical College and P.B.M. Hospital, Bikaner. Results: Majority of the patients presented with abdominal pain (86%) and abdominal tenderness (81%). Conclusion: We concluded that young Males are predominantly affected.  Road traffic accident forms the most common mode of injury.  Though conservative management is successful in carefully selected patients, operative management remains the main stay of treatment. Keywords: Blunt trauma, Age, Sex


Author(s):  
Mahesh Kumar Sharma ◽  
Dr. Arun Bhargava

Background: Blunt abdominal trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among all age groups. So we evaluate the spectrum and outcome of blunt trauma. Methods: Hospital based prospective study conducted on 100 patients at department of general surgery. Results: Distribution according to type of injury consisted of maximum cases, 84 (84%) of road traffic accidents, 11% cases were of fall from height. Conclusions: Males were pre-dominantly affected. Road traffic accident was the most common cause of injury. Though conservative management is successful in carefully selected patients, operative management remains the main stay of treatment. Keywords: Blunt abdominal trauma, Liver injury, Perforation, Splenic injury


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1738
Author(s):  
Reno Rudiman ◽  
Nova Saragih ◽  
Andriana Purnama

Background: Occult ongoing bleeding has become the second highest cause of death in blunt abdominal trauma. Undetected abdominal injury has caused morbidity and mortality in patients at the early phases of trauma. Non-operative Management (NOM) in solid organ trauma is safe and effective, and this strategy has become widely used. Lactate clearance (LC) has important clinical benefits in patients with acute trauma that is superior to initial lactate examination.  Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study of patients with history of hemorrhagic shock caused by blunt abdominal trauma that came to emergency room of Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung from August 2015 to July 2016. The tests were including initial blood lactate, 2 hours, and 4 hours post-resuscitation and then calculation of LC. Analysis using SPSS with chi square for the significance of relationships and Spearman correlation to determine the strength of the relationship between variables. Comparison test between LC2 and LC4 were calculated using Mann-Whitney tests.Results: During one year period, from August 2015 to July 2016, there were 34 patients. Age was in the range of 15-65 years, with a range of 15-25 years were 19 (55.8%), 25-50 years were 11 (32.4%), and >50 years as many as four (11.8%). By sex, there were 28 (82.4%) male gender and 6 (17.6%) women. Based on the type of trauma, there were 11 (32.4%) single trauma patients and 23 (67.6%) multiple trauma patients. Based on the results of statistical analysis with chi square, there was a significant correlation between lactate clearance 2 hours (LC2) and lactate clearance 4 hours (LC4) with the success of NOM (p <0.001) with the Odds Ratio (OR) are 3.750 and 6.500 respectively. Based on non-parametric test (Mann Whitney) showed that there were no significant differences between the LC2 and LC4 in determining the successful of NOM (p>0.05).Conclusions: There was a significant relationship between lactate clearance 2 hours (LC2) and lactate clearance 4 hours (LC4) in determining the success of non-operative management (NOM) in patients with history of hemorrhagic shock caused by blunt abdominal trauma. In addition, there are no significant differences between the LC2 and LC4 in determining the success of the NOM, so that either LC2 or LC4 may be used in predicting the success of NOM, as LC4 is the first preference. The low level of lactate clearance may be used as one of indicators to terminate non-operative management and proceed with surgery right before all symptoms of hemorrhagic shock arise.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1930
Author(s):  
Induchoodan Ponnamma Pillai Sukumaran Nair ◽  
Rajesh P. S.

Background: worldwide road traffic accidents accounts as the leading cause of death of young people. For a very long time most of the intra-abdominal injuries following blunt abdominal trauma were managed operatively. Conservative management is becoming more acceptable and effective management option for blunt abdominal trauma during the last few decades.Methods: This study was conducted in Government Medical College, Kottayam during September 2007 to December 2008. All conservatively managed blunt abdominal trauma patients during the study period were included in the study.Results: Out of 22 patients, 4 patients failed conservative management. Success rate was 81%. Most commonly injured solid organ in the study group was liver (77%). Maximum cases were of age group 10 to 20 (31.81%) years. 81% of patients were males. Motor vehicle accident was the most common cause of trauma (77%). Mean stay in intensive care unit was 4.2 days and mean hospital stay was 15.7 days. Mean systolic blood pressure was 110 mmHg ranging from 70 to 130 mmHg. 50% of patients had moderate hemoperitoneum and non-had massive hemoperitoneum.Conclusions: Non operative management is safe and effective approach in blunt spleen and liver injuries. Non operative management should be treatment of choice for all hemodynamically stable patients with blunt liver and splenic trauma.


Author(s):  
Ajay Pal ◽  
Indira . ◽  
L. K. Kapil

Background: Blunt abdominal trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among all age groups. Many injuries may not manifest during the initial assessment and treatment period. Methods: Hospital based cross-sectional study conducted at Trauma center and P.B.M Hospital, Bikaner Results: Distribution according to type of injury consisted of maximum cases, 86% of road traffic accidents 74 of which were male and 12 female. 10% cases were of fall from height, 6 were male and 4 female .Assault cases were 4%. Case distribution according to organ involved consisted of 54.00% cases of liver injury,18.00% cases were of splenic injury, 23.00% patients had ilial injury, Pancreatic injury occurred in 2patient. Conclusions: Males were pre-dominantly affected. Road traffic accident was the most common cause of injury. Though conservative management is successful in carefully selected patients, operative management remains the main stay of treatment. Keywords: Blunt abdominal trauma, Liver injury, Perforation, Splenic injury


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1350
Author(s):  
Ramachandra M. L. ◽  
Krishna S. R.

Background: Trauma remains the most common cause of death for all individuals between the ages of 1 and 44 years. 10% of these fatalities are attributable to abdominal injury. The Indian fatality rates for trauma are 20 times that for developed countries. The management of patients with blunt abdominal injury has evolved greatly over the last few decades from complete surgical management historically to present non operative management in most of the cases. In view of increasing number of road traffic accidents, rampant increase in construction work, accidental fall from height, this study is conducted to look into the causes of such incidents and also to strengthen the already established rules of non operative management in cases of blunt trauma abdomen.Methods: This is a prospective study of 53 patients who presented to K. R. Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, for management of blunt trauma abdomen over the period of January 2016 to June 2017. Unstable patients with initial resuscitation underwent Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma. Failed resuscitation with free fluid in abdomen confirmed by FAST immediately shifted to operation theatre for laparotomy and proceed. Hemodynamically stable patients underwent computerized tomography of abdomen. Organ injuries were scaled according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma and these patients were managed conservatively after ruling out hollow viscus perforation.Results: Majority of the patients belonged to male sex (85%) and of the age group 21-40 years constituting 58.3% of patients. Road traffic accident was the most common mode of injury which included 35 patients (66%). A total of 19 cases had splenic injury out of which 13 (68.5%) underwent non operative management and 6 (31%) underwent emergency Splenectomy. liver injury was present in 15 patients and all were managed conservatively. In total non operative management was done in 73.5% of cases and surgical management was done in 26.5% of cases.Conclusions: The presence of free fluid with organ injury always does not mandate laparotomy. Patient selection, early diagnosis and repeated clinical examination and use of appropriate investigations forms the key in non operative management of blunt trauma abdomen. RTA being the most common mode of injury, adequate measures should be taken to prevent road traffic accidents by strict action and traffic norms and citizen education.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Ghimire ◽  
N Yogi ◽  
P Ghimire

Background: To assess the feasibility of Non-operative management of Blunt abdominal trauma in a teaching hospital of Nepal. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out over a period of 3 years including 52 cases of blunt abdominal trauma in a teaching hospital in western part of Nepal. Patient and trauma characteristics of the cases, different modalities of treatment and outcomes were evaluated. All the cases were divided in 3 groups: Operative group, Non-Operative Management and Non-Operative Failure group. Operative group and non-operative management group were compared using Fischer Exact Test for categorical variable and student’s “t” test for continuous variable. Results: There were 36% of cases in operative group, 61% in non-operative management group and 2% in non-operative management failure group. Non-operative management was successful in 97% of cases. Injury severity score, admission hematocrit and hemodynamic status were significantly different between non-operative management and Operative group. Non-operative management failure occurred in 1 case and was secondary to delayed hepatic hemorrhage. Conclusion: Non-operative management of Blunt abdominal trauma can be attempted with high degree of success. Hemodynamic and clinical instability rather than severity of the organ injury is the predictor of failure in non-operative management. Spleen and bowel injury are the most common organ that usually land up in operative group because of hemodynamic instability in splenic injury and peritoneal contamination in bowel injury. Close surveillance in an intensive care unit is always desirable. Nepal Journal of Medical Sciences | Volume 02 | Number 01 | Jan-Jun 2013 | Page 38-41 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njms.v2i1.7650


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-9
Author(s):  
ASMJ Chowdhury ◽  
MS Alam ◽  
SK Biswas ◽  
RK Saha ◽  
AR Mondal ◽  
...  

Road traffic accidents in Bangladesh have been rapidly increasing with huge mortality through road accidents each year. There are many causes of road accidents in recent years; one important cause is running of locally made improvised three wheelers (flat bed tricycle) in the urban areas and also on the highways, popularly known as 'Nasimon' and 'Karimon'. This prospective study was carried out in Faridpur Medical College Hospital from January through June 2011, to study the accident patients caused by 'Nasimon' and 'Karimon'. Fifty six (12%) patients were of RTA by 'Nasimon' and 'Karimon' out of a total of 468 patients admitted into our hospital during this period. Most patients (41, 73.21%) were male, highest accidents (24, 42.86%) were observed among 21-30 years age group and most victims (33, 58.93%) were belonged to low socioeconomic status. Commonest (31, 55.36%) victims were passengers of 'Nasimon' and 'Karimon' while maximum number of accidents (46, 82.14%) took place in the urban areas and on the highways. Injury pattern of victims were similar to that found in any other road accident patients. These three wheelers 'Nasimon' and 'Karimon' are run in violating of Bangladesh Motor Vehicles Act (1983) as they are totally unfit for plying on the highways. Strict surveillance against these illegal and risky vehicles on the highways and in the urban areas by law enforcing agencies is required as a measure to reduce the burden of road accidents in our country.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/fmcj.v7i1.10289Faridpur Med. Coll. J. 2012;7(1): 06-09


2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
pp. 552-557
Author(s):  
W Bekker ◽  
MTD Smith ◽  
VY Kong ◽  
JL Bruce ◽  
G Laing ◽  
...  

Introduction The clinical significance of isolated free fluid on abdominal computed tomography (CT) in patients with blunt abdominal trauma is unclear. This audit reviews our unit’s experience with isolated free fluid and attempts to refine our clinical algorithms for the assessment of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Materials and methods All patients who sustained blunt abdominal trauma between December 2012 and December 2017 who were subjected to multidetector CT of the abdomen as part of their initial investigation were included in this study. Results During the five-year period under review, a total of 1066 patients underwent abdominal CT following blunt poly trauma. A total of 84 (7.9%) patients died. There were 148 (14%) patients with CT finding of isolated free fluid. Of these, 128 (67%) were selected for non-operative management, which included a period of serial abdominal examinations. In this non-operative group, five patients failed their abdominal observations and underwent laparotomy. Findings in these five cases were negative (1), non-therapeutic (1), splenic injury (1), Pancreatic and splenic injury (1) and bladder injury (1). Thirteen patients (10%) died, none of whom had surgery. The causes of death were exsanguination from a major traumatic lower limb injury (1), multiple organ failure (1), traumatic brain injury (10) and spinal cord injury (1). The remaining 20 patients underwent laparotomy. The indications were failed non-operative management (5), abdominal distension (1) and suspicion of a missed hollow viscus injury (14). In this group there were 11 therapeutic and 6 non-therapeutic surgeries and three negative laparotomies. For the 15 patients selected for operative management, the findings were as follows: hollow viscus injury (3), mesenteric bleeds (2), splenic and pancreatic injury (1), liver and bladder injury (1), splenic and bladder injury (1), non-therapeutic (4), negative (3). The finding of isolated free fluid on CT is 98% sensitive and 96% specific for true isolated free fluid (chi square 331.598; P = 0.000). This finding predicts successful non-operative management with a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 96%. Discussion In patients with blunt abdominal trauma, the finding of isolated free fluid on abdominal CT alone is no longer an indication for laparotomy. Other clinical factors must be taken into account when deciding on the need for laparotomy, such as haemodynamic status, clinical abdominal findings and the ability to reliably assess the abdomen. In the absence of a clinical indication for urgent laparotomy, patients with isolated free fluid may be observed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document