scholarly journals Distribution and Determinants of Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) at a Specialized Hospital in Dhaka City

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
SK Sader Hossain ◽  
Md Abdullah Alamgir ◽  
Ferdous Ara Islam ◽  
Sheikh Mohammed Ekramullah ◽  
Shudipto Kumar Mukharjee ◽  
...  

Background: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is the process of intra cranial CSF diversion to relieve the pressure inside the ventricles. This allows the cerebrospinal fluid to flow directly to the basal cisterns, thereby shortcutting any obstruction. It is used as an alternative to a cerebral shunt surgery.Objectives: To observe the Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) with causal factors and outcome.Methodology: The study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery in National Institute of Neurosciences (NINS) during the period from June, 2013 to August, 2014. All the study subjects included in the study were selected for endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) following clinical and radiological diagnosis of hydrocephalus or raised ICP irrespective of age, sex and causal factors. The patients were followed post operatively to follow the outcome.Result: ETV was performed among 38 males and 35 females with a mean age of 24.67 years. Three major causal factors for ETV were aqueductal stenosis, posterior fossa SOL and CP angle tumour observed in 25 (34.3%), 22(30.2%), 11(15.1%) cases respectively. The successful ETV was done in 49 (67.1%) patients varied widely by diagnosis and patient age. Other 32.9% had suffered from several complications like local CSF drainage, local infection, meningitis and subarachnoid haemorrhage and treated conservatively.Conclusion: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is a safe and successful procedure in the management obstructive hydrocephalus.J. Natl Inst. Neurosci Bangladesh 2015;1(1):5-7

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Schroeder ◽  
Steffen Fleck ◽  
Michael R. Gaab ◽  
Klaus H. Schweim ◽  
Henry W. S. Schroeder

Object The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare CSF flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and endoscopic aqueductoplasty (EAP) in patients presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus caused by aqueductal stenosis. Methods In patients harboring aqueductal stenosis who underwent EAP (n = 8), ETV (n = 8), and both ETV and EAP (n = 6), CSF flow through the restored aqueduct and through the ventriculostomy was investigated using cine cardiac-gated phase-contrast MRI. For qualitative evaluation of CSF flow, an in-plane phase-contrast sequence in the midsagittal plane was used. The MR images were displayed in a closed-loop cine format. Quantitative through-plane measurements were performed in the axial plane perpendicular to the aqueduct and/or floor of the third ventricle. Results Evaluation revealed significantly higher CSF flow through the ventriculostomies compared with flow through the aqueducts. This was true both when comparing the ETV group with the EAP group and when comparing the flow of the ventriculostomy and aqueduct within the ETV and EAP group. There was no difference in aqueductal CSF flow between patients who underwent EAP alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. There was also no difference in ventriculostomy CSF flow between patients who underwent ETV alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. Fifty percent of the restored aqueducts became occluded at a mean of 46 months after surgery (range 18–126 months). In contrast, all ETVs remained patent in the mean follow-up period of 110 months after surgery, although 1 patient required shunt placement after 66 months. Conclusions Cerebrospinal fluid flow through ventriculostomies is significantly higher than aqueductal CSF flow after EAP. This could be one factor to explain why the reclosure rate of aqueducts after EAP is higher than the reclosure rate of the ventriculostoma after ETV.


2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Siomin ◽  
Giuseppe Cinalli ◽  
Andre Grotenhuis ◽  
Aprajay Golash ◽  
Shizuo Oi ◽  
...  

Object. In this study the authors evaluate the safety, efficacy, and indications for endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in patients with a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage or intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) infection. Methods. The charts of 101 patients from seven international medical centers were retrospectively reviewed; 46 patients had a history of hemorrhage, 42 had a history of CSF infection, and 13 had a history of both disorders. All patients experienced third ventricular hydrocephalus before endoscopy. The success rate for treatment in these three groups was 60.9, 64.3, and 23.1%, respectively. The follow-up period in successfully treated patients ranged from 0.6 to 10 years. Relatively minor complications were observed in 15 patients (14.9%), and there were no deaths. A higher rate of treatment failure was associated with three factors: classification in the combined infection/hemorrhage group, premature birth in the posthemorrhage group, and younger age in the postinfection group. A higher success rate was associated with a history of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement before ETV in the posthemorrhage group, even among those who had been born prematurely, who were otherwise more prone to treatment failure. The 13 premature infants who had suffered an IVH and who had undergone VP shunt placement before ETV had a 100% success rate. The procedure was also successful in nine of 10 patients with primary aqueductal stenosis. Conclusions. Patients with obstructive hydrocephalus and a history of either hemorrhage or infection may be good candidates for ETV, with safety and success rates comparable with those in more general series of patients. Patients who have sustained both hemorrhage and infection are poor candidates for ETV, except in selected cases and as a treatment of last resort. In patients who have previously undergone shunt placement posthemorrhage, ETV is highly successful. It is also highly successful in patients with primary aqueductal stenosis, even in those with a history of hemorrhage or CSF infection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-109
Author(s):  
Sarita Chowdhary ◽  
Shyamendra Pratap Sharma ◽  
Pranaya Panigrahi ◽  
Manoj Kumar Yadav ◽  
Shiv Prasad Sharma

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is currently considered as an alternative to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt systems in the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus. This procedure allows the CSF to drain in the basal cisterns and reabsorbed by arachnoid granulations, and avoiding implantation of exogenous material. <b><i>Aims and Objectives:</i></b> The purpose of this study was to assess the success rate of ETV in infants less than 1 year of age with congenital noncommunicating hydrocephalus. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> This study was a 2-year prospective study from August 2017 to July 2019. ETVs were performed in 14 patients younger than 1 year with diagnosis of noncommunicating hydrocephalous. A failure was defined as the need for shunt implantation after ETV. Phase-contrast MRI of the brain was done after 6 months to see patency of ETV fenestration and CSF flow through ventriculostomy. <b><i>Results:</i></b> ETV was tried in 18 patients and successfully performed in 14 patients. Out of the 14 patients, shunt implantation after ETV was performed in 3 patients (failed ETV). In the successful cases, etiology was idiopathic aqueductal stenosis in 8, shunt complications in 2, and 1 case was a follow-up case of occipital encephalocele; the mean age was 7.7 months (range 3–12). In the 3 failed cases, etiology was aqueductal stenosis, mean age was 7.6 months (range 3–11). In all ETVs, failed patients MPVP shunting was done. Follow-up of nonshunted patients was done from 6 to 24 months (mean 15 months). There was no mortality or permanent morbidity noted following ETV. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> ETV is a good surgical procedure for less than 1-year-old children.


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Tarek ◽  
Hamdy Ibrahim ◽  
H Jalalod'din ◽  
SR Tawadros

Abstract Background Treatment of secondary hydrocephalus due to posterior fossa tumors in these children is still a matter of controversy, although preoperative ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VP shunt) insertion before tumor excision is widely accepted among neurosurgeons but many attempts are rising to minimize permanent VP shunt insertion and associated complications and introducing third endoscopic ventriculostomy (ETV) as one of the options of 2ry hydrocephalus. Objectives Comparing the post-operative clinical success with resolution of the manifestations and post-operative complications between endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt as different modes of CSF diversion in children with 2ry hydrocephalus due to midline posterior fossa tumors. Methods The following electronic databases were searched from June 2009 to june2019: PubMed, Google scholar search engine. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, EMBASE and science Direct, using the keywords ―hydrocephalus; posterior fossa tumors; pediatrics; ventriculoperitoneal shunt; endoscopic third ventriculostomy‖. Studies were eligible if they contain the target keywords in title or abstract, addressing the Pediatric age group with 2ry hydrocephalus due to de novo posterior fossa tumor manifested by signs of increase the intra cranial tension including persistent headache and vomiting, blurred vision, 6th nerve palsy, papilledema in fundus examination, acute DCL and 2ry hydrocephalus confirmed by brain imaging. Exclusion criteria included studies including age group below 1yr or above 18 yr, or patients with recurrent post fossa tumors and operated before or patients presented by failed previously attempt of CSF diversion. Results: A total of 1255 citations were screened for eligibility,6 studies were included in our systematic review discussing, comparing and evaluating the durability of ETV versus VP shunt in treatment the 2ry hydrocephalusdue to pediatric posterior fossa tumor.. Overall study population reached 474 patients. the overall clinical findings at presentation and postoperative outcomes regarding the clinical findings improvement, radiological improvement and postoperative complications between ETV and VP shunt are compared and showing that ETV should be considered as an alternative procedure to VP shunt in controlling severe hydrocephalus related to posterior fossa tumors to relieve symptoms quickly during the preoperative period when patients should wait for their definite tumor excision. Conclusion The shorter duration of surgery, the lower incidence of morbidity, the absence of mortality, the lower incidence of procedure failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy as compared to ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and the significant advantage of not becoming shunt dependent make endoscopic third ventriculostomy to be recommended as the first choice in the treatment of pediatric patients with marked obstructive hydrocephalus due to posterior fossa tumors. It is a preliminary, simple, safe, effective, physiological, minimally invasive procedure for the relief of elevated intracranial pressure before direct tumor removal.


Author(s):  
Ian K. Pople ◽  
William Singleton

The management of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) disorders via CSF diversion is now a complex clinical science, requiring a detailed understanding of CSF physiology in both the normal and diseased brain. Successful treatment of this group of disorders requires a comprehensive knowledge of all the available shunt types, their similarities, differences, and idiosyncrasies. The rapid development of endoscopic neurosurgical techniques makes treating this group of patients without a shunt often a real possibility, and arguably is now a core neurosurgical skill. In this chapter we will summarize the CSF physiology in the normal state, and explain the principles of CSF diversion before going on to describe the various shunt types available. A section will be devoted to endoscopic CSF diversion techniques, including a detailed explanation of third ventriculostomy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah C. Jernigan ◽  
Jay G. Berry ◽  
Dionne A. Graham ◽  
Liliana Goumnerova

Object The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of CSF diversion with endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) versus shunt therapy in infants with hydrocephalus. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 5416 infants 1 year of age or younger with hydrocephalus (congenital or acquired) in whom CSF diversion was performed using either ETV or shunt placement at 41 children's hospitals between 2004 and 2009. Data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information Systems database. Surgical failure was defined as the need for a repeat diversion operation within 1 year of initial surgery. The authors compared failure rates of ETV and shunt, as well as patient demographics and clinical characteristics, using hierarchical regression according to treatment group. Results During the period examined, 872 infants (16.1%) initially underwent ETV and 4544 (83.9%) underwent ventricular shunt placement. The median infant age was 37 days (IQR 11–122 days) for both ETV and shunt placement. More infants who underwent ETV rather than shunt placement were born prematurely (41.6% vs 23.9%, respectively; p < 0.01) and had intraventricular hemorrhage (45.4% vs 17.5%, respectively; p < 0.01). Higher operative failure rates at 1 year were observed in infants who underwent ETV as opposed to shunt surgery (64.5% vs 39.6%, respectively; OR 2.9 [95% CI 2.3–3.5], p < 0.01). After controlling for prematurity, intraventricular hemorrhage, and spina bifida, ETV remained associated with a higher risk of failure (OR 2.6 [95% CI 2.1–3.2]). Conclusions In infants with hydrocephalus, a greater 1-year CSF diversion failure rate may occur after ETV compared with shunt placement. This risk is most significant for procedures performed within the first 90 days of life. Further investigation of the need for multiple reoperations, cost, and impact of surgeon and hospital experience is necessary to distinguish which treatment is more effective in the long term.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document