scholarly journals A Novel Marker for Screening Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Using Routine Complete Blood Count and Cell Population Data

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimin Kahng ◽  
Yonggoo Kim ◽  
Jung Ok Kim ◽  
Kwangsang Koh ◽  
Jong Wook Lee ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp W. Raess ◽  
Gert-Jan M. van de Geijn ◽  
Tjin L. Njo ◽  
Boudewijn Klop ◽  
Dmitry Sukhachev ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eloísa Urrechaga ◽  
Oihane Bóveda ◽  
Urko Aguirre

AimsThe cell population data (CPD) parameters reported by XN analyser (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) reflect the size and internal structure of leucocytes. We aimed to assess the clinical utility of these parameters as biomarkers for the early diagnosis of sepsis.MethodsThe study group (G1) included 586 controls (no quantitative or morphological alterations in the complete blood count) and 137 patients diagnosed with sepsis. The reliability of the model was evaluated using a validation group (G2) of 212 controls and 60 patients with sepsis. The optimal cut-off for the diagnosis of sepsis and the OR for CPD were established using a univariate logistic regression. A multivariate logistic regression model was then created. The OR and area under the curve were recorded. A risk stratification scale (neutrophils and monocytes (NEMO)) for diagnosing sepsis was established on the basis of the coefficients of the multivariate model.ResultsMO-X and neutrophils fluorescence intensity (NE-SFL) were found to be the most relevant of the CPD in predicting sepsis applying multivariate analysis to G1.NEMO score was composed using the above-mentioned CPD and subsequently stratified into three risk groups: mild (≤3), moderate (4≤NEMO≤5) and high (≥6). The OR for patients with a score of 4–5 was 10 and 249 for a score of ≥6. When applied to G2, the positive predictive value was 84.8 % and the negative predictive value was 96.0%.ConclusionsCPD are potentially useful for the early diagnosis of sepsis. Their values were used to compose in NEMO score can help in rapid and reliable decision making.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Erdelyi ◽  
Laszlo Papp ◽  
Imre Foldesi ◽  
Katalin Farkas ◽  
Zsolt Molnar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sepsis is one of the most significant healthcare concerns of the 21st century. In the United States sepsis affect 1.7 million adults, with 270,000 fatal cases, according to the estimation of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The management of sepsis relies on early recognition, therefore the emergency departments have distinctive role in sepsis care, hence the need for early reliable risk stratification tools.Methods A retrospective, quantitative study was performed in Department of Emergency, University of Szeged. Hungary. Patients with suspected infection were enrolled to four subgroups based on the results of patient examination and laboratory results. In all cases (N=276), cell population data markers were analyzed along with ordinary infection biomarkers, such as CRP, PCT and WBC. Performance of cell population data parameters were investigated with ROC (Receiver Operating Curve) analysis.Results Almost all cell population biomarkers showed significant differences in the subgroup analysis. Remarkable performance was found in three markers (NE-SFL/M, MO-X/M and NE-WY/M) in patients having septic shock. Combining quick SOFA with these biomarkers (qS-Ne2Mo score) resulted in excellent diagnostic ability for septic shock (AUC 0.914, p<0.001), with good sensitivity (73.9%) and excellent specificity (89 %).Conclusions Since determination of cell population data requires complete blood count analysis, turn-around time of this novel indicator is significantly lower than other methods. qS-Ne2Mo score might be used as an initial screening tool to select only those patients that need more extensive laboratory investigations for their proper treatment and spare inadequate, time and money consuming laboratory requests.Trial Registration: University of Szeged, Ethical Committee ref. nr. 25/2016-SZTE


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document