scholarly journals Application of 3-dimensional printing implants for bone tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Woong Park ◽  
Huyn Guy Gang
Keyword(s):  
Bone Tumors ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Three-Dimensional Printing in Cleft Care: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110131
Author(s):  
Farrukh R. Virani ◽  
Evan C. Chua ◽  
Mary Roz Timbang ◽  
Tsung-yen Hsieh ◽  
Craig W. Senders
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Objective: To determine the current applications of 3-dimensional (3D) printing in the care of patients with cleft lip and palate. We also reviewed 3D printing limitations, financial analysis, and future implications. Design: Retrospective systematic review. Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were used by 3 independent reviewers. Articles were identified from Cochrane library, Ovid Medline, and Embase. Search terms included 3D printing, 3 dimensional printing, additive manufacturing, rapid prototyping, cleft lip, and cleft palate. Exclusion criteria included articles not in English, animal studies, reviews without original data, oral presentations, abstracts, opinion pieces, and articles without relevance to 3D printing or cleft lip and palate. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measure was the purpose of 3D printing in the care of patients with cleft lip and palate. Secondary outcome measures were cost analysis and clinical outcomes. Results: Eight-four articles were identified, and 39 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eleven studies used 3D printing models for nasoalveolar molding. Patient-specific implants were developed via 3D printing in 6 articles. Surgical planning was conducted via 3D printing in 8 studies. Eight articles utilized 3D printing for anatomic models/educational purposes. 3-Dimensional printed models were used for surgical simulation/training in 6 articles. Bioprinting was utilized in 4 studies. Secondary outcome of cost was addressed in 8 articles. Conclusion: 3-Dimensional printing for the care of patients with cleft lip and palate has several applications. Potential advantages of utilizing this technology are demonstrated; however, literature is largely descriptive in nature with few clinical outcome measures. Future direction should be aimed at standardized reporting to include clinical outcomes, cost, material, printing method, and results.

scholarly journals Mandibular reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates contour deformity

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Azuma ◽  
Toru Yanagawa ◽  
Naomi Ishibashi–Kanno ◽  
Fumihiko Uchida ◽  
Takaaki Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Prototyping ◽  
Mandibular Reconstruction ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Contour Deformity ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Transforming the Degradation Rate of β-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Replacement Using 3-Dimensional Printing

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Shen ◽  
Maxime M. Wang ◽  
Lukasz Witek ◽  
Nick Tovar ◽  
Bruce N. Cronstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tricalcium Phosphate ◽  
Degradation Rate ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Bone Replacement ◽  
Dimensional Printing

scholarly journals Accuracy of maxillofacial prototypes fabricated by different 3-dimensional printing technologies using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Faezeh Yousefi ◽  
Abbas Shokri ◽  
Maryam Farhadian ◽  
Fariborz Vafaei ◽  
Fereshte Forutan
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Printing

scholarly journals Aplikasi Mesin Cetak 3 Dimensi Untuk Pembuatan Saklar Tempat Duduk Pada Mobil KIA Carnival

Infotekmesin ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49
Author(s):  
Onery Andy Saputra ◽  
Sudiro Sudiro ◽  
Utomo Ramelan
Keyword(s):  
Product Design ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Automotive Components ◽  
Original Product ◽  
Product Design Process ◽  
Feasibility Test ◽  
Dimensional Printing ◽  
Printing Machine ◽  
Original Component ◽  
Made In

The types of automotive components today vary greatly. The presence of more components types make it difficult to find suitable automotive components. 3D Printing Machine is a new breakthrough to overcome these problems. This is based on the working concept of a 3-dimensional printing machine that make components done by the product design process and then print it through a 3-dimensional printing machine. This concept is further developed in the form of feasibility test of several aspects which are able to assess the results of the component products in order to be marketed. The purpose of this research is to see the feasibility of 3-dimensional printing machine products in terms of component shapes, component functions, terms of component dimensions and in the terms of similarity to the original product. The research methodology used in this research is descriptive quantitative comparative qualitative. The results of this study are, 1) The 3-dimensional product design has a similarity of 50%, but it is still lacking for the amount of fillet (upper angular curvature of the design). Meanwhile, for the size and shape in general have been made in accordance with the original product. 2) Forms that can be made from 3-dimensional printing still look less ergonomic. 4) The performance or function of the 3-dimensional printing component is able to match its function. 5) The weight of the 3-dimensional priting component is 47.19% heavier than the original component. 6) The dimensions of the components of 3-dimensional printing results on average for flat areas have a deviation of about 5.39% and for the profile field it reaches 35.29%.

3-Dimensional Printing of Models to Create Custom-Made Devices for Coil Embolization of an Anastomotic Leak After Aortic Arch Replacement

2009 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 974-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Sodian ◽  
Daniel Schmauss ◽  
Christoph Schmitz ◽  
Amir Bigdeli ◽  
Sandra Haeberle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Coil Embolization ◽  
Aortic Arch Replacement ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Dimensional Printing

scholarly journals On-Demand Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Printing of Custom Cranioplastic Prostheses

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander I Evins ◽  
John Dutton ◽  
Sayem S Imam ◽  
Amal O Dadi ◽  
Tao Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Production Time ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
3D Print ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Abstract BACKGROUND Currently, implantation of patient-specific cranial prostheses requires reoperation after a period for design and formulation by a third-party manufacturer. Recently, 3-dimensional (3D) printing via fused deposition modeling has demonstrated increased ease of use, rapid production time, and significantly reduced costs, enabling expanded potential for surgical application. Three-dimensional printing may allow neurosurgeons to remove bone, perform a rapid intraoperative scan of the opening, and 3D print custom cranioplastic prostheses during the remainder of the procedure. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of using a commercially available 3D printer to develop and produce on-demand intraoperative patient-specific cranioplastic prostheses in real time and assess the associated costs, fabrication time, and technical difficulty. METHODS Five different craniectomies were each fashioned on 3 cadaveric specimens (6 sides) to sample regions with varying topography, size, thickness, curvature, and complexity. Computed tomography-based cranioplastic implants were designed, formulated, and implanted. Accuracy of development and fabrication, as well as implantation ability and fit, integration with exiting fixation devices, and incorporation of integrated seamless fixation plates were qualitatively evaluated. RESULTS All cranioprostheses were successfully designed and printed. Average time for design, from importation of scan data to initiation of printing, was 14.6 min and average print time for all cranioprostheses was 108.6 min. CONCLUSION On-demand 3D printing of cranial prostheses is a simple, feasible, inexpensive, and rapid solution that may help improve cosmetic outcomes; significantly reduce production time and cost—expanding availability; eliminate the need for reoperation in select cases, reducing morbidity; and has the potential to decrease perioperative complications including infection and resorption.

The Emerging Role of 3-Dimensional Printing in Rhinology

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janalee K. Stokken ◽  
John F. Pallanch
Keyword(s):  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Printing
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document