scholarly journals Tenofovir alafenamide treatment may not worsen the lipid profile of chronic hepatitis B patients: a propensity score-matched analysis

Author(s):  
Joonho Jeong ◽  
Jung Woo Shin ◽  
Seok Won Jung ◽  
Eun Ji Park ◽  
Neung Hwa Park
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiichi Ogawa ◽  
Makoto Nakamuta ◽  
Toshimasa Koyanagi ◽  
Aritsune Ooho ◽  
Norihiro Furusyo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and AimsOutcome data of sequential hepatitis B virus treatment with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and renal safety of TAF in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who were previously treated with entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), or nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) combination. MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 458 consecutive CHB patients who switched to TAF monotherapy after at least two years of treatment with another NA. The longitudinal virological/laboratory responses were evaluated up to 96 weeks after switchover. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<60 mL/min/1.73m2. ResultsThe proportions of HBV DNA suppression (HBV DNA<20 IU/mL) at week 96 were 99.0%, 97.8%, and 98.4% in the prior ETV (n=198), TDF (n=137), and NA combination (n=123) groups, respectively. Almost all patients with HBV DNA of 20-2000 IU/mL at baseline achieved HBV DNA suppression at week 96. On multivariable generalized estimated equation (GEE) analysis, a low quantitative hepatitis surface antigen (qHBsAg) level at baseline was associated with a lower follow-up qHBsAg level (coefficient 0.81, P<0.001). The eGFR showed greater improvement in patients with CKD compared to those with non-CKD according to the multivariable GEE analysis (coefficient 21.7, P<0.001). However, the increase of eGFR reached a peak between weeks 24 and 48. ConclusionsBased on this longitudinal data analysis up to 96 weeks, sequential NA therapy with a switch to TAF is a good option to better achieve high viral suppression and renal safety.


Gut ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2019-319867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Su ◽  
Kristin Berry ◽  
George N Ioannou

ObjectiveEntecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are first-line agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Recent studies have challenged the assumption that these agents are equally effective at preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine whether the risk of HCC and mortality differ in patients with CHB treated with ETV and TDF.DesignWe performed a retrospective cohort study of Veterans Affairs patients with CHB in the USA who initiated treatment with ETV or TDF between the dates of Food and Drug Administration approval of these medications and 1 January 2017. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the association between antiviral therapy and HCC risk as well as the risk of death or liver transplantation. Propensity score adjustment and competing risks analysis were performed.ResultsWe identified 2193 ETV-treated and 1094 TDF-treated patients who were followed for a mean of 5.4 years. We found no difference in the risk of HCC in ETV-treated versus TDF-treated patients (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.32). Results were similar in propensity score adjusted and competing risks analysis, and in multiple sensitivity analyses. We also found no difference in the risk of death or liver transplantation (aHR 1.16, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.39).ConclusionsWe found no difference in the risk of HCC between patients with CHB treated with ETV versus TDF. Our results support current guideline recommendations that both agents are appropriate first-line options for the treatment of CHB.


Author(s):  
Henry Lik-Yeun Chan ◽  
Patrick Marcellin ◽  
Andrew L Cathcart ◽  
Neeru Bhardwaj ◽  
John F Flaherty ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Tian ◽  
Sherilyn K. D. Houle ◽  
Mhd. Wasem Alsabbagh ◽  
William W. L. Wong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document