Mouse Plantar Flexor Muscle Size and Strength After Inactivity and Training

2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (7) ◽  
pp. 632-638
Author(s):  
Joseph C. Wenke ◽  
Gordon L. Warren ◽  
Christopher R. Rathbone ◽  
Robert B. Armstrong
Author(s):  
Tadashi Suga ◽  
Masafumi Terada ◽  
Keigo Tomoo ◽  
Yuto Miyake ◽  
Takahiro Tanaka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although joint flexibility is important for human locomotion, the determinants of joint flexibility are not fully understood. In this study, we examined the relationship between dorsiflexion flexibility and plantar flexor muscle size in healthy young males. Methods and results The dorsiflexion flexibility was assessed using range of motion (ROM) and stiffness during active and passive dorsiflexion. Active ROM was defined as the maximal angle during voluntary dorsiflexion. Passive ROM was defined as the angle at the onset of pain during passive dorsiflexion. Passive stiffness was calculated as the slope of the linear portion of the torque-angle curve between 10º and 20º dorsiflexion of the ankle during passive dorsiflexion. In the first study, the plantar flexor muscle volume (MV) in 92 subjects was estimated on the basis of the lower leg length and plantar flexor muscle thickness, as measured using ultrasonography. The estimated plantar flexor MV correlated significantly with active ROM (r = -0.433), passive ROM (r = -0.299), and passive stiffness (r = 0.541) during dorsiflexion (P = 0.01 for all). In the second study, the plantar flexor MV in 38 subjects was measured using magnetic resonance imaging. The plantar flexor MV correlated significantly with plantar flexor active ROM (r = -0.484), passive ROM (r = -0.383), and passive stiffness (r = 0.592) during dorsiflexion (P = 0.05 for all). Conclusions These findings suggest that a larger plantar flexor MV is related to less dorsiflexion flexibility in healthy young males.


Author(s):  
Timothy S. Pulverenti ◽  
Gabriel S. Trajano ◽  
Benjamin J. C. Kirk ◽  
Vanesa Bochkezanian ◽  
Anthony J. Blazevich

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Carlsson ◽  
G.-B. Henning ◽  
U. Svantesson ◽  
K.S. Sunnerhagen

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 340-341
Author(s):  
R. Sert ◽  
N.E. Akalan ◽  
K. Onerge ◽  
C. Sardogan ◽  
F. Bilgili

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 146-151
Author(s):  
Sophie Emery ◽  
Jill Cook ◽  
April-Rose Ferris ◽  
Peter Smith ◽  
Susan Mayes

1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 477-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Ekenman ◽  
Li Tsai-Felländer ◽  
Pär Westblad ◽  
Ibrahim Turan ◽  
Christer Rolf

We aimed to study intrinsic factors in 29 consecutive patients with well-documented unilateral stress fractures of the tibia. Anthropometry, range of motion, isokinetic plantar flexor muscle performance, and gait pattern were analyzed. The uninjured leg served as the control. A reference group of 30 uninjured subjects was compared regarding gait pattern. Anterior stress fractures of the tibia (N = 10) were localized in the push-off/ landing leg in 9/10 athletes, but were similarly distributed between legs in posteromedial injuries (N = 19). Ten (30%) of the stress fracture subjects had bilateral high foot arches, similar to those found in the reference group. There were no other systematic differences in anthropometry, range of motion, gait pattern, or isokinetic plantar flexor muscle peak torque and endurance between injured and uninjured legs. No other differences were found between anterior and posteromedial stress fractures. We conclude that anterior stress fractures of the tibia occur mainly in the push-off/landing leg in athletes. Within the limitations of our protocol, no registered intrinsic factor was found to be directly associated with the occurrence of a stress fracture of the tibia.


2000 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen B Salsich ◽  
Michael J Mueller ◽  
Shirley A Sahrmann

Abstract Background and Purpose. Patients with diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy (DM and PN) often complain of joint stiffness. Although stiffness may contribute to some of the impairments and functional limitations found in these patients, it has not been quantified in this population. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare passive ankle stiffness and dorsiflexion (DF) range of motion in subjects with DM and PN versus an age-matched comparison group. Subjects. Thirty-four subjects were tested (17 subjects with DM and PN and 17 subjects in an age-matched comparison group). There were 10 male subjects and 7 female subjects in each group. Methods. A Kin-Com dynamometer was used to measure passive plantar flexor torque as each subject's ankle was moved from plantar flexion into dorsiflexion at 60°/s. The following variables were compared using a Student t test: initial angle (angle of onset of plantar flexor torque), maximal dorsiflexion angle, plantar flexor muscle excursion (difference between initial angle and maximal dorsiflexion angle), slope of the first half of the plantar flexor torque curve (stiffness 1 measurement), and slope of the second half of the plantar flexor torque curve (stiffness 2 measurement). Results. The subjects with DM and PN group had smaller maximal dorsiflexion angles and less plantar flexor muscle excursion than the comparison group. There was no difference in initial angle, stiffness 1 measurement, or stiffness 2 measurement. Conclusion and Discussion. Although the subjects with DM and PN had less dorsiflexion range of motion than did the comparison group, there was no difference in stiffness between the groups. This finding suggests that people with DM and PN have “short” versus “stiff” plantar flexor muscles.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1201-1209
Author(s):  
N. Ekin Akalan ◽  
Shavkat Kuchimov ◽  
Adnan Apti ◽  
Yener Temelli ◽  
Merve Ören ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document