scholarly journals THE RIGHTS TO SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD FOR SAME-SEX PARTNERSHIPS

Author(s):  
Оксана Покальчук

The growing populist sentiment in society and, as a consequence, the reactive adoption of new restrictive legal acts that discriminate and unjustifiably restrict citizens' rights, is a major challenge for the scientific community and human rights in Ukraine. The issue of reproductive rights is one of the most important elements of common discriminatory and often unscientific narratives both in the EU and in Ukraine. Therefore, the scientific community has to take up this challenge and, by examining and exploring the various aspects of the right to reproduce, uphold the rule of science and the rights of Ukrainans, especially in this domain. Surrogate motherhood is always used in combination with other methods of assisted reproductive technology. Thus, surrogate motherhood, as a method of treatment, is burdened not only with legal uncertainty, but also with additional necessary steps (taking donor material, instrumental insemination, etc.) that precede assisted gestation.It is believed that all assisted reproductive technologies, including surrogacy, are treatment methods; therefore, their use cannot in any way depend on a person's social status, including gender self-identification, the fact of marriage or same-sex partnership.The list of medical grounds for surrogate motherhood is defined in the Order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine On Approval of the Procedure for the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Ukraine. However, we emphasize that the list should be expanded to include diagnoses of transsexuality and other gender identity disorders according to the International Classification of Diseases. Thus, according to item 10 ofthe Unified Clinical Protocol of Primary, Secondary (Specialized) and Tertiary (Highly Specialized) Medical Care: Gender Dysphoria, reproduction opportunities for FtM patients may include freezing of oocytes (eggs) or embryos. Frozen gametes and embryos can later be used for delivery by a surrogate mother. The question stands whythis possibility is not considered in the protocol for the MtF transition with the subsequent possibility of delivery by a surrogate mother. Obviously, with the MtF transition, even with gender reassignment surgery, including the operation the genitals, the woman is not capable of independent childbearing. Such a woman can thus exerciseher right to reproduction only by fertilizing a donor egg with her sperm and then having the embryo that is genetically hers carried to term by a surrogate mother. The issue of male identity for the origin of the donor material (sperm) also needs separate legal regulation. However, in our opinion, this social group should not be discriminated against in access to surrogate motherhood as an assisted reproductive technology.

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117955811774960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Stasi

The National Legislative Assembly of Thailand has enacted on February 19, 2015 the Protection for Children Born through Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act (ART Act). Its primary objective aims at protecting children born through assisted reproductive technologies and providing the legal procedures that the intended parents must follow. The focus of this article is to discuss the ongoing issues involving assisted reproduction in Thailand. After reviewing the past legal framework surrounding surrogate motherhood and the downsides of the assisted reproductive technology market in Thailand, the article will discuss the new ART Act and its regulatory framework. It will conclude that although the new law contains some flaws and limitations, it has so far been successful in tackling surrogacy trafficking and preventing reproductive scandals from occurring again.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Legge ◽  
Ruth Fitzgerald

The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in New Zealand is governed by the Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004 (the HART Act), which provides for all procedures currently undertaken by fertility clinics and other centres involved with ART. Although the Act has provided good coverage for the use of ART over the last 16 years, it did not have a revision clause. Here, we explore whether the HART Act should be reviewed, and outline the important considerations that need to be taken into account to ensure that the legislation is up to date with current issues and technologies.


Author(s):  
Ayo Wahlberg

This chapter chronicles the difficult birth of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in China through the 1980s and 1990s, showing how ideas of improving population quality acted as a persuasive alibi for those pioneers working to develop fertility technologies under crude conditions and at a time when contraception rather than conception was at the core of family planning. From difficult beginnings in the 1980s and following legalization in 2003, ARTs have now settled firmly within China’s restrictive reproductive complex as technologies of birth control—which, in turn, has allowed it to grow into a thriving, sector as China is now home to some of the world’s largest fertility clinics and sperm banks.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
INMACULADA DE MELO-MARTÍN

It might come as a surprise to many that Spain, a country with a strong Catholic tradition that officially banned contraceptive technologies until 1978, has some of the most liberal regulations in assisted reproduction in the world. Law No. 35/1988 was one of the first and most detailed acts of legislation undertaken on the subject of assisted-conception procedures. Indeed, not only did the law permit research on nonviable embryos, it made assisted reproductive technologies available to any woman, whether married or not, through the national healthcare system.


2011 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 135-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nehaluddin Ahmad

Modern medicine, specifically assisted reproductive technology (ART), has overtaken the law in many jurisdictions around the world. New technologies and practices open a Pandora's Box of ethical, religious, social and legal questions, and may present a variety of significant legal problems to the courts and legislators. Surrogate motherhood and pregnancy through ART have both attracted controversy. Some groups condemn ART and want it banned while its supporters acknowledge there is a need for legislative guidelines and regulations. A proposed statute, the Assisted Reproductive Technique Services Act, aimed at regulating reproductive technologies, including surrogacy arrangements, will be introduced in the Malaysian parliament, probably in 2012, and the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill 2010 is already before the Indian parliament. This paper will discuss several of the potential socio-legal issues surrounding ART in the light of the complex situation, with a comparative analysis of the Malaysian, USA, UK and Indian positions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document