Non-Extraction Treatment of a Skeletal Class II Adult Patient with Severe Crowding Using Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-20
Author(s):  
Jin-young Park ◽  
Hyo-Won Ahn
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-217
Author(s):  
Seung-Weon Lim ◽  
Ha-Yeon Park ◽  
Won-Young Park ◽  
Min-Hee Oh ◽  
Kyung-Min Lee ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullsalam Abdulqawi Al-Dumaini ◽  
Esam Halboub ◽  
Maged Sultan Alhammadi ◽  
Ramy Abdul Rahman Ishaq ◽  
Mohamed Youssef

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 1011-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasinee Sangcharearn ◽  
Christopher Ho

Abstract Objectives: To determine the amount of variation in overjet and overbite that may result from changes in upper and lower incisor angulations following upper first premolar extraction treatment in Class II malocclusions. Materials and Methods: Typodonts were set up to simulate a skeletal Class II occlusion treated with upper first premolar extractions. The upper incisor angulation was altered through a range from 100° to 120° to the palatal plane by 2° increments. The overjet and overbite were measured with every 2° of upper incisor angulation change. A regression analysis was performed on the experimental data, and the regression coefficients, slope, and intercept were estimated. Results: Excessive proclination of the lower incisors will result in an abnormal overjet and overbite relationship for any magnitude of upper incisor angulation. A normal lower incisor angulation facilitates the attainment of an optimal occlusion. Excessive palatal root torque of the upper incisors will result in an increase in overjet and a consequent decrease in overbite. If the upper incisors are excessively retroclined, an edge-to-edge incisor relationship will result. Conclusion: Class II camouflage treatment with upper first premolar extractions requires correctly angulated incisors to achieve optimal buccal segment interdigitation and incisor relationship. Labial root torque and interproximal reduction of the lower anterior teeth should be considered when the lower incisors are excessively proclined.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
Tina Chugh ◽  
AbhayK Jain ◽  
AnandK Patil ◽  
SanjayV Ganeshkar ◽  
B Sangamesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. OR7-OR13
Author(s):  
Priyanka ◽  
Yagyeshwar Malhotra

INTRODUCTION: External apical root resorption is a common iatrogenic side effect of orthodontic treatment and has been reported particularly in anterior teeth. The etiology of resorption is multifactorial, complex and individual susceptibility to resorption depends on various factors.MATERIALS AND METHOD: The degree of root resorption during orthodontic treatment was evaluated on the post-treatment RVGs of the maxillary and mandibular central and lateral incisors of 28 skeletal Class II patients with mandible retrusion treated with non-extraction treatment protocol using elastics and PowerScope. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in root resorption between the groups for the overall score and comparison of root resorption in individual teeth between two groups showed significantly more resorption in PowerScope group in mandibular lateral incisors.CONCLUSION: Both elastic and PowerScope groups showed mostly mild to moderate root resorption which is clinically acceptable and lower lateral incisors showed statistically more root resorption in PowerScope group.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (52) ◽  
pp. 40-51
Author(s):  
Renato Barcellos Rédua

Class II malocclusion has a high incidence in the population, which may compromise smile aesthetics, occlusion function and stability. Skeletal Class II may affect facial aesthetics and upper airway volume. Class II malocclusion is routinely associated with skeletal Class II condition, having as treatment alternatives the use of Extra Buccal Appliance (EBA) or removable or fixed propulsor appliance. This article describes a case of a patient who did not accept the use of EBA and so it was fitted a Flex Developer propulsor for Class II correction and discussed the advantages and disadvantages of therapeutic alternatives for Class II correction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document