scholarly journals Gendered Impressions of Issue Publics as Predictors of Climate Activism

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Geiger ◽  
Janet Kay Swim
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Nam Kim ◽  
Lan Ni ◽  
Sei-Hill Kim ◽  
Jangyul Robert Kim

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Frederick ◽  
Kurt Neuwirth
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 109-127
Author(s):  
Shibley Telhami ◽  
Jon Krosnick

10.1068/c9c ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-126
Author(s):  
Mark J Wattier ◽  
Raymond Tatalovich

In this study we assess whether the two major political parties and their presidential candidates played any role in mobilizing public support for environmentalism, as compared with economic issues. Our empirical analysis is based on (1) content analysis of the party platforms, (2) content analysis of campaign rhetoric, and (3) identification of ‘attentive’ publics in the electorate. Over the period 1972–92 no fewer than 12% of respondents mentioned economics but no more than 3.9% mentioned purely environmental concerns. We conclude that the environmental policy agenda did not originate from two-party electoral competition.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ganaele Langlois ◽  
Greg Elmer ◽  
Fenwick McKelvey ◽  
Zachary Devereaux

Through three case studies of online political activism on Facebook, this article conceptualizes the deployment of issue publics (Lippmann, 1993; Marres, 2005) on Facebook. We argue that issue publics on Facebook come into being through a specific set of double articulations of code and politics that link and reshape informational processes, communicational constraints and possibilities, and political practices in different and sometimes contradictory ways. Using Maurizio Lazzarato’s exploration of immaterial labour (2004), we demonstrate the need to further understand the networking of publics and their issues by considering how online platforms provide the material, communicational, and social means for a public to exist and therefore define the parameters for assembling issues and publics and circumscribe a horizon of political agency.


2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 833-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Brenes Peralta ◽  
Magdalena Wojcieszak ◽  
Yphtach Lelkes ◽  
Claes de Vreese

We examine three under-studied factors in selective exposure research. Linking issue publics and motivated reasoning literatures, we argue that selectivity patterns depend on (a) whether an individual is an issue public member; (b) the availability of balanced, pro-, and counter-attitudinal content; and (c) the evidence for a message claim (numerical vs. narrative). Using an online experiment ( N = 560), we track information selection about climate change and health care. Most notably, on both issues, issue publics selected more balanced content with numerical evidence, compared with non-issue publics. We discuss the implications of our findings for the selective exposure literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document