scholarly journals High-Intensity Statin vs. Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Target for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Territory-Wide Cohort Study in Hong Kong

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Kei-Yan Ng ◽  
Pauline Yeung Ng ◽  
April Ip ◽  
Chung-Wah Siu

Background: Different guidelines recommend different approaches to lipid management in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We aim to determine the best strategy for lipid management in Asian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Method: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in patients who underwent first-ever PCI from 14 hospitals in Hong Kong. All participants either achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <55 mg/dl with ≥50% reduction from baseline (group 1), or received high-intensity statin (group 2), or both (group 3) within 1 yr after PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and any unplanned coronary revascularization between 1 and 5 yr after PCI.Results: A total of 8,650 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up period of 4.2 yr. After the adjustment of baseline characteristics, complexity of PCI and medications prescribed and the risks of the primary outcome were significantly lower in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74–0.93, P = 0.003) and group 3 (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62–0.90; P = 0.002). The primary outcome occurred at similar rates between group 2 and group 3.Conclusions: Use of high intensity statin, with or without the attainment of guidelines recommended LDL-C target, was associated with a lower adjusted risk of MACE at 5 yr, compared with patients who attained LDL-C target without high intensity statin.

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maneesh Sud ◽  
Lu Han ◽  
Maria Koh ◽  
Husam Abdel-Qadir ◽  
Peter Austin ◽  
...  

Introduction: Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Few studies have examined LDL-C control and outcomes exclusively after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Furthermore, guidelines provide no formal recommendation on when to check LDL-C after PCI. It is therefore conceivable that LDL-C is not routinely measured after PCI, many patients may have elevated LDL-C levels (≥ 70mg/dL), and that elevated LDL-C levels after PCI are associated with adverse long-term outcomes. Objective: To evaluate LDL-C levels after PCI procedures, and to assess the association between LDL-C and cardiovascular events in a population-based cohort. Methods: All patients who received their first PCI between Oct 2011 and Sep 2014 in Ontario, Canada, and had a cholesterol measurement within 6 months after PCI were included. Multivariable Fine and Gray sub-distribution hazards models were used to assess the association between LDL-C measured after PCI and the incidence of MACE (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and cardiovascular death) through December 31, 2016. Results: There were 47,884 patients who had their first PCI during the study period, and 52% had an LDL-C measurement within 6 months post-procedure (median age 63 years, 27% female). Among them, 57% had LDL-C < 70mg/dL, 28% had LDL-C 70 to < 100mg/dL, and 15% had LDL-C ≥ 100mg/dL. After a median of 3.2 years of follow-up, 19% of patients had a qualifying MACE. After adjustment, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher in patients with higher LDL-C levels (Figure). Conclusions: Only one in two patients had LDL-C measured within 6 months after undergoing PCI and only about half had LDL-C < 70mg/dL. Higher levels of LDL-C after PCI were associated with a significantly higher incidence of MACE. Recommendations for routine LDL-C assessment and optimization may improve patient outcomes after PCI procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document