scholarly journals Case Report: Successful Treatment of Refractory Interstitial Lung Disease With Cyclosporine A and Pirfenidone in a Child With SLE

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linxia Deng ◽  
Yaxian Chen ◽  
Xiufen Hu ◽  
Jianhua Zhou ◽  
Yu Zhang

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) as an initial manifestation of lupus is rare, especially in young children. Here, we report a case of a 3-year-old boy who presented with fever, shortness of breath, and facial erythema. Clinical examination suggested a diagnosis of active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with butterfly rash, anemia, positive antinuclear antibody, positive anti-double-stranded DNA, and hypocomplementemia. On retrospective review of the patient’s records, multiple chest computed tomography (CT) images showed non-specific interstitial pneumonia + organizing pneumonia pattern, with no further autoimmune work-up during the visit to a respiratory department. In our opinion, persistent interstitial pneumonia may be a clue to connective tissue disease. The patient received steroid treatment for 1 year, and the radiological and immunological resolution was noted. However, he still suffered from cough and dyspnea. After a 1-year follow-up, he was hospitalized again for SLE relapse. While continuing corticosteroid therapy, the patient was given combination therapy consisting of cyclosporine A (CsA) and monthly-pulse cyclophosphamide for 6 months, and decreased proteinuria was noted. However, the patient’s respiratory symptoms and pulmonary radiologic findings did not improve significantly. With continued steroid therapy, the patient was started on a daily regimen of CsA and pirfenidone. Both drugs were sufficiently effective to allow gradual reduction of steroid dosage. After 2 years of treatment, marked improvements in symptoms, pulmonary function and chest CT images were observed. Our experience with this case emphasizes that prompt work-up for connective tissue disease (CTD) should be considered in young children with ILD, and pirfenidone might be a useful add-on therapy with immunosuppressive agents for refractory CTD-ILD in pediatric patients. Nevertheless, further clinical trials including larger numbers of patients need to assess the efficiency and safety of this combination therapy for refractory CTD-ILD.

2020 ◽  
Vol 144 (12) ◽  
pp. 1509-1516
Author(s):  
Andrew Churg

Context.— Various pulmonary diseases can produce centrilobular (peribronchiolar) fibrosis, which may be isolated or associated with other patterns of more diffuse fibrosis. The major forms of interstitial lung disease in which centrilobular fibrosis is found are fibrotic (chronic) hypersensitivity pneumonitis, connective tissue disease–associated interstitial lung disease, and (a disputed issue) usual interstitial pneumonia/idiopathic interstitial fibrosis. Objective.— To review recent literature that addresses separation of these entities. Data Sources.— Data comprised recent publications. Conclusions.— In a specially constructed multidisciplinary discussion exercise, it was found that peribronchiolar metaplasia affecting more than half the bronchioles or more than 2 foci of peribronchiolar metaplasia per square centimeter of biopsy area was strongly associated with a confident diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Giant cells or granulomas were only found in cases with a greater than 50% diagnostic confidence in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Conversely, greater numbers of fibroblast foci per square centimeter and increasing measured amounts of subpleural fibrosis favored a diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia. Recent data also suggest that centrilobular fibrosis can be found in usual interstitial pneumonia, although the presence of centrilobular fibrosis statistically favors an alternate diagnosis. Connective tissue disease is a major confounder because many patterns are very similar to fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis or usual interstitial pneumonia. Genetic abnormalities, such as the MUC5B minor allele overlap, in these conditions and at this point cannot be used for discrimination. Thus, the separation of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and usual interstitial pneumonia remains a difficult problem. Accurate biopsy diagnosis of all of these diseases requires correlation with imaging and clinical findings, and is crucial for treatment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 142 (9) ◽  
pp. 1080-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Caroline Toledo do Nascimento ◽  
Bruno Guedes Baldi ◽  
Marcio Valente Yamada Sawamura ◽  
Marisa Dolhnikoff

Context.— Interstitial lung disease, a common complication observed in several connective tissue diseases, causes significant morbidity and mortality. Similar to individuals with connective tissue diseases, a significant subgroup of patients with clinical and serologic characteristics suggestive of autoimmunity but without confirmed specific connective tissue disease presents with associated interstitial lung disease. These patients have been classified using different controversial nomenclatures, such as undifferentiated connective tissue disease–associated interstitial lung disease, lung-dominant connective tissue disease, and autoimmune featured interstitial lung disease. The need for a better understanding and standardization of this entity, interstitial lung disease with autoimmune features, and the need for an adequate management protocol for patients resulted in the introduction of a new terminology in 2015: interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. This new classification requires a better comprehension of its diagnostic impact and the influence of its morphologic aspects on the prognosis of patients. Objective.— To review the diagnostic criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features, with an emphasis on morphologic aspects. Data Sources.— The review is based on the available literature, and on pathologic, radiologic, and clinical experience. Conclusions.— The interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features classification seems to identify a distinct subgroup of patients with different prognoses. Studies show that nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia are the most prevalent morphologic patterns and show discrepant results on the impact of the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on survival. Prospective investigations are necessary to better define this subgroup and to determine the prognosis and appropriate clinical management of these patients.


Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Marco Sebastiani ◽  
Paola Faverio ◽  
Andreina Manfredi ◽  
Giulia Cassone ◽  
Caterina Vacchi ◽  
...  

In 2015 the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) “Task Force on Undifferentiated Forms of Connective Tissue Disease-associated Interstitial Lung Disease” proposed classification criteria for a new research category defined as “Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features” (IPAF), to uniformly define patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and features of autoimmunity, without a definite connective tissue disease. These classification criteria were based on a variable combination of features obtained from three domains: a clinical domain consisting of extra-thoracic features, a serologic domain with specific autoantibodies, and a morphologic domain with imaging patterns, histopathological findings, or multicompartment involvement. Features suggesting a systemic vasculitis were excluded. Since publication of ERS/ATS IPAF research criteria, various retrospective studies have been published focusing on prevalence; clinical, morphological, and serological features; and prognosis of these patients showing a broad heterogeneity in the results. Recently, two prospective, cohort studies were performed, confirming the existence of some peculiarities for this clinical entity and the possible progression of IPAF to a defined connective tissue disease (CTD) in about 15% of cases. Moreover, a non-specific interstitial pneumonia pattern, an anti-nuclear antibody positivity, and a Raynaud phenomenon were the most common findings. In comparison with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), IPAF patients showed a better performance in pulmonary function tests and less necessity of oxygen delivery. However, at this stage of our knowledge, we believe that further prospective studies, possibly derived from multicenter cohorts and through randomized control trials, to further validate the proposed classification criteria are needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document