scholarly journals Fourier Motion Processing in the Optic Tectum and Pretectum of the Zebrafish Larva

2022 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Auriane Duchemin ◽  
Martin Privat ◽  
Germán Sumbre

In the presence of moving visual stimuli, the majority of animals follow the Fourier motion energy (luminance), independently of other stimulus features (edges, contrast, etc.). While the behavioral response to Fourier motion has been studied in the past, how Fourier motion is represented and processed by sensory brain areas remains elusive. Here, we investigated how visual moving stimuli with or without the first Fourier component (square-wave signal or missing fundamental signal) are represented in the main visual regions of the zebrafish brain. First, we monitored the larva's optokinetic response (OKR) induced by square-wave and missing fundamental signals. Then, we used two-photon microscopy and GCaMP6f zebrafish larvae to monitor neuronal circuit dynamics in the optic tectum and the pretectum. We observed that both the optic tectum and the pretectum circuits responded to the square-wave gratings. However, only the pretectum responded specifically to the direction of the missing-fundamental signal. In addition, a group of neurons in the pretectum responded to the direction of the behavioral output (OKR), independently of the type of stimulus presented. Our results suggest that the optic tectum responds to the different features of the stimulus (e.g., contrast, spatial frequency, direction, etc.), but does not respond to the direction of motion if the motion information is not coherent (e.g., the luminance and the edges and contrast in the missing-fundamental signal). On the other hand, the pretectum mainly responds to the motion of the stimulus based on the Fourier energy.

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1343-1404
Author(s):  
A Ghallab ◽  
R Reif ◽  
R Hassan ◽  
AS Seddek ◽  
JG Hengstler

ACS Omega ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazushi Yamaguchi ◽  
Kohei Otomo ◽  
Yuichi Kozawa ◽  
Motosuke Tsutsumi ◽  
Tomoko Inose ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-220
Author(s):  
Weijian Zong ◽  
Runlong Wu ◽  
Shiyuan Chen ◽  
Junjie Wu ◽  
Hanbin Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent D. Ching-Roa ◽  
Eben M. Olson ◽  
Sherrif F. Ibrahim ◽  
Richard Torres ◽  
Michael G. Giacomelli

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.


2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Olivier ◽  
Alexandre Mermillod-Blondin ◽  
Craig B. Arnold ◽  
Emmanuel Beaurepaire

Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Feby Wijaya Pratiwi ◽  
Chien-Chung Peng ◽  
Si-Han Wu ◽  
Chiung Wen Kuo ◽  
Chung-Yuan Mou ◽  
...  

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have emerged as a prominent nanomedicine platform, especially for tumor-related nanocarrier systems. However, there is increasing concern about the ability of nanoparticles (NPs) to penetrate solid tumors, resulting in compromised antitumor efficacy. Because the physicochemical properties of NPs play a significant role in their penetration and accumulation in solid tumors, it is essential to systematically study their relationship in a model system. Here, we report a multihierarchical assessment of the accumulation and penetration of fluorescence-labeled MSNs with nine different physicochemical properties in tumor spheroids using two-photon microscopy. Our results indicated that individual physicochemical parameters separately could not define the MSNs’ ability to accumulate in a deeper tumor region; their features are entangled. We observed that the MSNs’ stability determined their success in reaching the hypoxia region. Moreover, the change in the MSNs’ penetration behavior postprotein crowning was associated with both the original properties of NPs and proteins on their surfaces.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Metgé ◽  
C. Fiorini-Debuisschert ◽  
F. Charra ◽  
G. Bordeau ◽  
E. Faurel ◽  
...  

Nano Letters ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 980-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bram van den Broek ◽  
Brian Ashcroft ◽  
Tjerk H. Oosterkamp ◽  
John van Noort

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document