scholarly journals Disability Adjusted Life Years due to Ischaemic Stroke Preventable by Real-Time Stroke Detection—A Cost-Utility Analysis of Hypothetical Stroke Detection Devices

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludwig Schlemm
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life ◽  
Life Years

Telestroke for acute ischaemic stroke: A systematic review of economic evaluations and a de novo cost–utility analysis for a middle income country

2021 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2110324
Author(s):  
Elise Tan ◽  
Lan Gao ◽  
Huong NQ Tran ◽  
Dominique Cadilhac ◽  
Chris Bladin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Rural China ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Utility Analysis

Introduction Telemedicine can alleviate the problems faced in rural settings in providing access to specialist stroke care. The evidence of the cost-effectiveness of this model of care outside high-income countries is limited. This study aimed to conduct: (a) a systematic review of economic evaluations of telestroke and (b) a cost–utility analysis of telestroke, using China as a case study. Methods We systematically searched Embase, Medline Complete and Cochrane databases. Inclusion criteria: full economic evaluations of telemedicine/telestroke networks examining the use of thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke, published in English. A cost–utility analysis was undertaken using a Markov model incorporating a decision tree to simulate the delivery of telestroke for acute ischaemic stroke in rural China, compared to no telestroke from a societal and healthcare perspective. One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of results. Results Of 559 publications found, eight met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review (two cost-effectiveness analyses and six cost–utility analyses, all performed in high-income countries). Telestroke was a cost-saving/cost-effective intervention in five out of the eight studies. In our modelled analysis for rural China, telestroke was the dominant strategy, with estimated cost savings of Chinese yuan 4,328 (US$627) and additional 0.0925 quality-adjusted life years per patient. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the base case results. Discussion Consistent with published economic evaluations of telestroke in other jurisdictions, telestroke represents a cost-effective solution to enhance stroke care in rural China.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Tissue Plasminogen Activator Therapy for Acute Ischaemic Stroke

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 927-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon E. Sinclair ◽  
Luciana Frighetto ◽  
Peter S. Loewen ◽  
Rubina Sunderji ◽  
Philip Teal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Tissue Plasminogen

scholarly journals Cost-Utility Analysis of Antibiotic Therapy versus Appendicectomy for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (16) ◽  
pp. 8473
Author(s):  
Ayesha Ali ◽  
Zina Mobarak ◽  
Mariam Al-Jumaily ◽  
Mehreen Anwar ◽  
Zaeem Moti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Randomised Control Trial ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Uncomplicated Appendicitis

Background: Current UK National Health Service (NHS) guidelines recommend appendicectomy as gold standard treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. However, an alternative non-surgical management involves administrating antibiotic-only therapy with significantly lower costs. Therefore, a UK-based cost-utility analysis (CUA) was performed to compare appendicectomy with an antibiotic-only treatment from an NHS perspective. Methods: This economic evaluation modelled health-outcome data using the ACTUAA (2021) prospective multicentre trial. The non-randomised control trial followed 318 patients given either antibiotic therapy or appendicectomy, with quality of life (QOL) assessed using the SF-12 questionnaires administered 1-year post-treatment. A CUA was conducted over a 1-year time horizon, measuring benefits in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs in pound sterling using a propensity score-matched approach to control for selection based on observable factors. Results: The CUA produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of −GBP 23,278.51 (−EUR 27,227.80) per QALY. Therefore, for each QALY gained using antibiotic-only treatment instead of appendicectomy, an extra GBP 23,278.51 was saved. Additionally, two sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for post-operative or post-treatment complications. The antibiotic-only option remained dominant in both scenarios. Conclusion: While the results do not rely on a randomized sample, the analysis based on a 1-year follow-up suggested that antibiotics were largely more cost-effective than appendicectomy and led to improved QOL outcomes for patients. The ICER value of −GBP 23,278.51 demonstrates that the NHS must give further consideration to the current gold standard treatment in acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

scholarly journals Economic Evaluation of an Internet-Based Stress Management Intervention Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanny Kählke ◽  
Claudia Buntrock ◽  
Filip Smit ◽  
Matthias Berking ◽  
Dirk Lehr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Stress Management ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

BACKGROUND Work-related stress is widespread among employees and associated with high costs for German society. Internet-based stress management interventions (iSMIs) are effective in reducing such stress. However, evidence for their cost-effectiveness is scant. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a guided iSMI for employees. METHODS A sample of 264 employees with elevated symptoms of perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale≥22) was assigned to either the iSMI or a waitlist control condition (WLC) with unrestricted access to treatment as usual. Participants were recruited in Germany in 2013 and followed through 2014, and data were analyzed in 2017. The iSMI consisted of 7 sessions plus 1 booster session. It was based on problem-solving therapy and emotion regulation techniques. Costs were measured from the societal perspective, including all direct and indirect medical costs. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-utility analysis relating costs to a symptom-free person and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, respectively. Sampling uncertainty was handled using nonparametric bootstrapping (N=5000). RESULTS When the society is not willing to pay anything to get an additional symptom-free person (eg, willingness-to-pay [WTP]=€0), there was a 70% probability that the intervention is more cost-effective than WLC. This probability rose to 85% and 93% when the society is willing to pay €1000 and €2000, respectively, for achieving an additional symptom-free person. The cost-utility analysis yielded a 76% probability that the intervention is more cost-effective than WLC at a conservative WTP threshold of €20,000 (US $25,800) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS Offering an iSMI to stressed employees has an acceptable likelihood of being cost-effective compared with WLC. CLINICALTRIAL German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00004749; https://www.drks.de/DRKS00004749 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPOR RR2-10.1186/1471-2458-13-655

Cost–utility analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism panel-based machine learning algorithm to predict risk of opioid use disorder

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J Mallow ◽  
Kathy W Belk
Keyword(s):  
Learning Algorithm ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Dominant Strategy ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Life Years

Aim: To conduct a cost–utility analysis of a novel genetic diagnostic test (OUDTEST) for risk of developing opioid use disorder for elective orthopedic surgery patients. Materials & Methods: A simulation model assessed cost–effectiveness and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for OUDTEST from private insurer and self-insured employer perspectives over a 5-year time horizon for a hypothetical patient population. Results: OUDTEST was found to cost less and increase QALYs, over a 5-year period for private insurance (savings US$2510; QALYs 0.02) and self-insured employers (-US$2682; QALYs 0.02). OUDTEST was a dominant strategy in 71.1% (private insurance) and 72.7% (self-insured employer) of model iterations. Sensitivity analyses revealed robust results except for physician compliance. Conclusion: OUDTEST was expected to be a cost-effective solution for personalizing postsurgical pain management in orthopedic patients.

scholarly journals Cost-Utility Analysis of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Azathioprine Based Regimens for Maintenance Therapy of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Nee ◽  
Ian Rivera ◽  
Dustin J. Little ◽  
Christina M. Yuan ◽  
Kevin C. Abbott
Keyword(s):  
Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Life Years

Background/Aims. We aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) as maintenance therapy for patients with Class III and Class IV lupus nephritis (LN), from a United States (US) perspective.Methods. Using a Markov model, we conducted a cost-utility analysis from a societal perspective over a lifetime horizon. The modeled population comprised patients with proliferative LN who received maintenance therapy with MMF (2 gm/day) versus AZA (150 mg/day) for 3 years. Risk estimates of clinical events were based on a Cochrane meta-analysis while costs and utilities were retrieved from other published sources. Outcome measures included costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), and net monetary benefit.Results. The base-case model showed that, compared with AZA strategy, the ICER for MMF was $2,630,592/QALY at 3 years. Over the patients’ lifetime, however, the ICER of MMF compared to AZA was $6,454/QALY. Overall, the ICER results from various sensitivity and subgroup analyses did not alter the conclusions of the model simulation.Conclusions. In the short term, an AZA-based regimen confers greater value than MMF for the maintenance therapy of proliferative LN. From a lifelong perspective, however, MMF is cost-effective compared to AZA.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Total Hip Arthroplasties: Technology Assessment of Surgical Procedures by Mailed Questionnaires

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 735-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uri Givon ◽  
Gary M. Ginsberg ◽  
Henri Horoszowski ◽  
Joshua Shemer
Keyword(s):  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Cementless Implant ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Hip Arthroplasties ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

AbstractA retrospective study comparing 700 consecutive total hip arthroplasties, utilizing four types of implants, was performed. Questionnaires based on hip scores were sent to 593 living patients. Useful responses were received from 363 (61 %) patients. Hip scores and quality-adjusted life-years were calculated. Multiple regression analysis, controlling for all possible biases, demonstrated one cementless implant as superior to all others. We believe that the use of mailed questionnaires is a simple and convenient system of follow-up, saving patients the need for outpatient clinic visits. The validity of such replies, however, has yet to be established.

scholarly journals Cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy between 6 and 24 hours in acute ischemic stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Pizzo ◽  
Maureen Dumba ◽  
Kyriakos Lobotesis
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Uk

Background Recently, two randomized controlled trials demonstrated the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy performed between 6 and 24 h in acute ischemic stroke. The current economic evidence is supporting the intervention only within 6 h, but extended thrombectomy treatment times may result in better long-term outcomes for a larger cohort of patients. Aims We compared the cost-utility of mechanical thrombectomy in addition to medical treatment versus medical treatment alone performed beyond 6 h from stroke onset in the UK National Health Service (NHS). Methods A cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy compared to medical treatment was performed using a Markov model that estimates expected costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 20-year time horizon. We present the results of three models using the data from the DEFUSE 3 and DAWN trials and evidence from published sources. Results Over a 20-year period, the incremental cost per QALY of mechanical thrombectomy was $1564 (£1219) when performed after 12 h from onset, $5253 (£4096) after 16 h and $3712 (£2894) after 24 h. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that thrombectomy had a 99.9% probability of being cost-effective at the minimum willingness to pay for a QALY commonly used in the UK. Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate that performing mechanical thrombectomy up to 24 h from acute ischemic stroke symptom onset is still cost-effective, suggesting that this intervention should be implemented by the NHS on the basis of improvement in quality of life as well as economic grounds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document