scholarly journals Effect of General Anesthesia vs. Conscious Sedation on the Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients After Endovascular Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teng-Fei Wan ◽  
Jian-Rong Zhang ◽  
Liang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Conscious Sedation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stroke Patients

Anesthetic strategy during endovascular therapy: General anesthesia or conscious sedation? (GOLIATH – General or Local Anesthesia in Intra Arterial Therapy) A single-center randomized trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1045-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Z Simonsen ◽  
Leif H Sørensen ◽  
Niels Juul ◽  
Søren P Johnsen ◽  
Albert J Yoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Conscious Sedation ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Rationale Endovascular therapy after acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion is now standard of care. There is equipoise as to what kind of anesthesia patients should receive during the procedure. Observational studies suggest that general anesthesia is associated with worse outcomes compared to conscious sedation. However, the findings may have been biased. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine whether the choice of anesthesia may influence outcome. Aim and hypothesis The objective of GOLIATH (General or Local Anestesia in Intra Arterial Therapy) is to examine whether the choice of anesthetic regime during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke influence patient outcome. Our hypothesis is that that conscious sedation is associated with less infarct growth and better functional outcome. Methods GOLIATH is an investigator-initiated, single-center, randomized study. Patients with acute ischemic stroke, scheduled for endovascular therapy, are randomized to receive either general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Study outcomes The primary outcome measure is infarct growth after 48–72 h (determined by serial diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging). Secondary outcomes include 90-day modified Rankin Scale score, time parameters, blood pressure variables, use of vasopressors, procedural and anesthetic complications, success of revascularization, radiation dose, and amount of contrast media. Discussion Choice of anesthesia may influence outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular therapy. The results from this study may guide future decisions regarding the optimal anesthetic regime for endovascular therapy. In addition, this study may provide preliminary data for a multicenter randomized trial.

Abstract T MP11: Acute Endovascular Reperfusion Therapy Has Inconsistent Results Across Randomized Clinical Trials -A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiya Osanai ◽  
Vinary Pasupuleti ◽  
Abhishek Deshpande ◽  
Priyaleela Thota ◽  
Yuani Roman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Good Outcome

Introduction: Endovascular (intra-arterial, IA) therapy for acute ischemic stroke has become part of acute therapy , but limited randomized clinical trials have had inconsistent results. We sought to evaluate efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy in - randomized clinical trials . Methods: We performed a systematic review of literature for randomized clinical trials of endovascular therapy with thrombolytic or mechanical reperfusion compared with comparator groups without IA therapy. Use of systemic thrombolysis was not excluded. Primary outcome was modified Rankin scale of disability of 0-2 at 90 days and secondary outcomes of mortality at 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was noted. Two groups of independent reviewers searched and identified studies and abstracted data. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Subgroups were analyzed by study design characteristics. Results: Systematic search identified 10 studies with 1572 subjects, of which 9 studies reported the primary outcome. IA therapy was associated with good outcome at 90 days (Odds ratio (OR) =1.28; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.62; p=0.04), but there was significant heterogeneity with p of 0.03. Among 3 trials (n=1136) comparing mechanical thrombectomy with control, mechanical thrombectomy was not superior to control with good outcome (OR=0.98; 95 % CI, 0.85 to 1.14; p=0.83). Patients with IA therapy significantly have good outcome in studies without systematic thrombolysis in the comparator (OR=1.55; 95 % CI, 1.05 to 2.29; p=0.03) and required vessel occlusion for randomization (OR=1.54; 95 % CI, 1.10 to 2.14; p=0.01). Mortality was unchanged with IA therapy (OR=0.92; 95 % CI, 0.75 to 1.13; p=0.45) and there was no difference in symptomatic hemorrhage (OR=1.13; 95 % CI, 0.74 to 1.74; p=0.56). Conclusion: IA therapy has a small but significant increase in good outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke without increasing mortality and symptomatic hemorrhages.

scholarly journals Conscious Sedation versus General Anesthesia for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Endovascular Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ren Jing ◽  
Hui-jun Dai ◽  
Fei Lin ◽  
Wan-yun Ge ◽  
Ling-hui Pan
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Sequential Analysis ◽  
Conscious Sedation ◽  
Trial Sequential Analysis ◽  
Type I

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of conscious sedation (CS) with general anesthesia (GA) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Registers of Controlled Trials (from inception to July 2017) were searched for reports on CS and GA of AIS undergoing EVT. Two reviewers assessed the eligibility of the identified studies and extracted data. Data were analyzed using the fixed-effects model, and the sources of heterogeneity were explored by sensitive analysis. Trial sequential analysis was conducted to monitor boundaries for the limitation of global type I error, and GRADE system was demonstrated to evaluate the quality of evidence. A total of thirteen studies were finally identified. Pooled analysis of the incidence of mRS score ≦ 2 after hospital discharge and one or three months in the CS group was higher than that in the GA group. The all-causing mortality of AIS patients in the CS group was lower than that in the GA group. There were no differences in the proportion of IA rtPA and thrombolysis between the two groups. Compared with AIS patients receiving GA, the all-causing mortality in the AIS patients receiving CS was decreased, while incidence of mRS score ≦ 2 at hospital discharge and one or three months was increased.

scholarly journals Effect of General Anesthesia and Conscious Sedation During Endovascular Therapy on Infarct Growth and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Z. Simonsen ◽  
Albert J. Yoo ◽  
Leif H. Sørensen ◽  
Niels Juul ◽  
Søren P. Johnsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Conscious Sedation

Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischemic stroke: a pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babikir Kheiri ◽  
Mohammed Osman ◽  
Ahmed Abdalla ◽  
Tarek Haykal ◽  
Sahar Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Safety of Cerebrolysin for Neurorecovery after Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twelve Randomized-Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1297
Author(s):  
Stefan Strilciuc ◽  
László Vécsei ◽  
Dana Boering ◽  
Aleš Pražnikar ◽  
Oliver Kaut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Safety Information ◽  
High Dose

We perforMed a systematic search and meta-analysis of available literature to determine the safety profile of Cerebrolysin in acute ischemic stroke, filling existing safety information gaps and inconsistent results. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews and Clinical Trials up to the end of February 2021. Data collection and analysis were conducted using methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. All safety outcomes were analyzed based on risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals. The meta-analysis pooled 2202 patients from twelve randomized clinical trials, registering non-statistically significant (p > 0.05) differences between Cerebrolysin and placebo throughout main and subgroup analyses. The lowest rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAE), as compared to placebo, was observed for the highest dose of Cerebrolysin (50 mL), highlighting a moderate reduction (RR = 0.6). We observed a tendency of superiority of Cerebrolysin regarding SAE in high dose treatment courses for moderate-severe ischemic stroke, suggesting some effect of the agent against adverse events. This comprehensive safety meta-analysis confirms the safety profile for patients treated with Cerebrolysin after acute ischemic stroke, as compared to placebo.

scholarly journals Association of local anesthesia versus conscious sedation with functional outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing embolectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-404
Author(s):  
Joseph T Marion ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Seyedsaadat ◽  
Jeffery J Pasternak ◽  
Alejandro A Rabinstein ◽  
David F Kallmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Conscious Sedation ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Hemodynamic Parameters ◽  
Stroke Patients

Purpose Compare functional outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing embolectomy with either local anesthesia or conscious sedation. Secondarily, identify differences in hemodynamic parameters and complication rates between groups. Materials and methods Single institution, retrospective review of all acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing embolectomy between January 2014 and July 2018 ( n = 185). Patients receiving general anesthesia ( n = 27) were excluded. One-hundred and eleven of 158 (70.3%) composed the local anesthesia group, and 47 (29.7%) composed the conscious sedation group. Median age was 71 years (interquartile range 59–79). Seventy-eight (49.4%) were male. The median National Institute of Health stroke scale score was 17.5 (interquartile range 11–21). Hemodynamic, medication, complication, and functional outcome data were collected from the anesthesia protocol and medical records. Good functional outcome was defined as a three-month modified Rankin Scale < 2. A multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the association of anesthesia type on three-month modified Rankin Scale score. Results Three-month modified Rankin Scale score <2 was similar between groups ( p = 0.5). Patients receiving conscious sedation were on average younger than patients receiving local anesthesia ( p = 0.01). Conscious sedation patients were more likely to receive intravenous thrombolytic prior to embolectomy ( p = 0.025). The complication rate and hemodynamic parameters were similar between groups. Conclusion Functional outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing embolectomy appears to be similar for patients receiving local anesthesia and conscious sedation. This similarity may be beneficial to a future study comparing general anesthesia to local anesthesia and conscious sedation. The use of local anesthesia or conscious sedation does not significantly impact hemodynamic status.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document