scholarly journals Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Distribution and Chemotherapy Benefit Among Women of Different Age Groups With HR-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Negative Breast Cancer in the SEER Database

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Cheng ◽  
Xiangyi Kong ◽  
Xiangyu Wang ◽  
Yi Fang ◽  
Jing Wang
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
L. C. Connell ◽  
M. Teo ◽  
S. O'Reilly ◽  
R. Beamish ◽  
E. J. Moylan

38 Background: An important question for ER positive, node negative breast cancer is the benefit of chemotherapy over hormonal therapy. We sought to explore if a low estimate of chemotherapy benefit, based on AdjuvantOnline, correlated with low risk Oncotype DX score , identifying patients (pts) for whom the “hormone therapy alone” treatment decision would not change. Methods: Our institutional database was reviewed to identify pts with ER positive, HER2 negative, node negative breast cancer submitted for oncotype DX testing. Clinicopathologic data and Oncotype Recurrence Score (RS) were extracted and entered into ‘Adjuvantonline’ to obtain estimated survival benefit gained at 10 years (yrs) (SBG@10). Two datasets were obtained; survival benefit gained at 10 yrs from chemotherapy only (SBG@10+C) and net survival benefit gained at 10 yrs: the absolute difference between combined therapy and hormone therapy (SBG@10 net). Pts were distributed into subgroups SBG@10 ≤3% and >3%. i.e. RS ≤18 versus >18.Correlation between SBG and RS were calculated with Spearman’s Rank method. Distribution of RS were compared with Mann-Whitney and Χ2 tests. Results: We identified 77 pts. For SBG@10+C ≤3% (n=28) and >3% (n=49) subgroups, 16 (57.1%) and 23 (46.7%) had low RS, respectively (p=0.53). Three (10.7%) and 10 (20.4%) in each subgroup had high RS (p=0.48). Distribution of RS between both subgroups was not significantly different, p=0.38. Correlation between RS and SBG@10 in the ≤3% subgroup was weak (rs=0.37, p=0.05). For SBG@10 net ≤3% (n=45) and >3% (n=32) subgroups, 25 (55.6%) and 14 (43.8%) had low RS, respectively (p=0.43). Five (11.1%) and 8 (25%) in each subgroup had high RS (p=0.20). Distribution of RS between both subgroups was not significantly different, p=0.19. Correlation between RS and SGB@10 in the ≤3% subgroup was weak (rs=0.21, p=0.15). Conclusions: Although the decision for additional chemotherapy changed for ≈10% with Oncotype DX, we could not identify a cohort of good prognosis pts for whom Oncotype DX would not significantly alter treatment recommendations. There are no subsets of node negative, ER positive, breast cancer for whom Oncotype DX does not provide independently significant prognostic and predictive information.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 815-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Tevis ◽  
R. Bassett ◽  
I. Bedrosian ◽  
C. H. Barcenas ◽  
D. M. Black ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeo Fujii ◽  
Hiroko Masuda ◽  
Yee Chung Cheng ◽  
Fei Yang ◽  
Aysegul A. Sahin ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose A subset of patients with intermediate 21-gene signature assay recurrence score may benefit from adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy, but a predictive strategy is needed to identify such patients. The 95-gene signature assay was tested to stratify patients with intermediate RS into high (95GC-H) and low (95GC-L) groups that were associated with invasive recurrence risk.Methods Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and RS 11-25 who underwent definitive surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy without any cytotoxic agents were included. RNA was extracted from archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, and 95-gene signature was calculated. Results Two hundred six patients had RS of 11-25 (95GC-L, N = 163; 95GC-H, N = 43). In Cox proportional hazards model, 95GC-H was significantly associated with shorter time to recurrence than was 95GC-L (HR 5.94; 95%CI 1.81-19.53; P = 0.005). The correlation between 95-gene signature and 21-gene signature assay scores was not strong (correlation coefficient r = 0.27), which might suggest that 95-gene signature reflects biological characteristics differing from what 21-gene signature shows.Conclusions The 95-gene signature stratifies patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancer and intermediate RS of 11-25 into high and low groups that are associated with recurrence risk of invasive disease. Further retrospective analysis in the prospectively-accrued TAILORx population is warranted to confirm that 95-gene signature can identify patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document