scholarly journals VEGFR Inhibitors for Uterine Metastatic Perivascular Epithelioid Tumors (PEComa) Resistant to mTOR Inhibitors. A Case Report and Review of Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aikaterini Liapi ◽  
Patrice Mathevet ◽  
Fernanda G. Herrera ◽  
Delfyne Hastir ◽  
Apostolos Sarivalasis
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Bone Biopsy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Bone Lesion ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Epithelioid Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Metastatic Progression ◽  
Tsc1 Gene

Uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are rare neoplasms. PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway upregulation is critical for their pathogenesis and is often associated with TSC1/TSC2 inactivation. Although first line mTOR inhibitors are an effective treatment, metastatic PEComas eventually progress. A 53-year-old woman presented a 4-month history of post-menopausal vaginal bleeding. Clinical and radiological examination detected a uterine mass and a single S1 bone lesion. The patient underwent a radical hysterectomy and bone biopsy. The anatomopathological evaluation concluded to an oligo-metastatic uterine PEComa. The tumor harbored a heterozygous deletion of 9q34 that contains the TSC1 gene. Concerning the primary lesion, the resection was complete and the single bone metastasis was treated with radiotherapy. Three months later, the patient presented bone, lung and subcutaneous metastatic progression. An everolimus and denosumab treatment was initiated. After 2 years of treatment, a clinically significant bone, lung and subcutaneous progression was detected. Following a literature review of the possible therapeutic options, we initiated a second line treatment by pazopanib. This treatment resulted in regression of the subcutaneous lesions and stability of lung and bone metastases. In this challenging, rare setting, our report suggests single agent, anti-angiogenic, tyrosine kinase inhibitor to be effective as second line treatment of metastatic uterine PEComa progressing on mTOR inhibitors.

Oxaliplatin Plus Irinotecan Compared With Irinotecan Alone as Second-Line Treatment After Single-Agent Fluoropyrimidine Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 4544-4550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel G. Haller ◽  
Mace L. Rothenberg ◽  
Alfred O. Wong ◽  
Piotr M. Koralewski ◽  
Wilson H. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Sensory Disturbances ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To determine whether irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (IROX) is superior to irinotecan alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with single-agent fluoropyrimidines. Patients and Methods A phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of patients with metastatic or recurrent CRC that had progressed or recurred during or after adjuvant or first-line fluoropyrimidines (fluorouracil/leucovorin or capecitabine, the latter only for metastatic CRC). Patients received IROX (irinotecan 200 mg/m2 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2) or irinotecan alone (350 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. Results At the data cutoff (when 447 of 628 randomly assigned patients had died), median overall survival was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.4 to 14.7 months) and 11.1 month (95% CI, 10.0 to 12.7 months) in the IROX and irinotecan groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94; P = .0072). Overall response rate (22% v 7%, respectively; P < .0001), median time to progression (5.3 v 2.8 months, respectively; P < .0001), and improvement in tumor-related symptoms (32% v 19%, respectively; P = .0072) were also improved with IROX as compared with irinotecan. With the exception of granulocytopenia (25% v 13%), diarrhea (28% v 23%), and sensory disturbances (5% v 0%), grade 3 to 4 toxicities were comparable between the IROX and irinotecan groups, respectively. Conclusion IROX is an effective treatment for metastatic CRC that has progressed after first-line fluoropyrimidine therapy. IROX improves efficacy compared with irinotecan alone, providing an additional option in the postadjuvant or second-line treatment setting for patients who experience treatment failure with single-agent fluoropyrimidine therapy.

Intravenous vinorelbine as first-line and second-line therapy in advanced breast cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2722-2730 ◽  
Author(s):  
B L Weber ◽  
C Vogel ◽  
S Jones ◽  
H Harvey ◽  
L Hutchins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

PURPOSE We evaluated single-agent intravenous (IV) vinorelbine as first- and second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC) in patients who were not resistant to anthracyclines. Objective tumor response (TR) and toxicity were assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 107 women were enrolled onto this multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label phase II study. Patients were stratified into first- and second-line treatment groups, based on prior treatment history. Vinorelbine was initially given at 30 mg/m2/wk, with dose modification for toxicity as indicated. Therapy was continued until disease progression or severe toxicity mandated withdrawal or until the patient asked to be removed from the study. RESULTS The objective response rate for all patients was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 44%): 35% (95% CI, 23% to 48%) for first-line patients and 32% (95% CI, 20% to 47%) for second-line patients. Nine first-line and three second-line patients obtained a complete response (CR). The median duration of objective response was 34 weeks in both groups. The overall survival durations of first- and second-line patients were 67 weeks and 62 weeks, respectively. Granulocytopenia was the predominant dose-limiting toxicity. Two patients died on study as a result of granulocytopenic sepsis. CONCLUSION Single-agent vinorelbine is an effective and well-tolerated agent for first- and second-line therapy of ABC. The results of this study confirm the findings of similar international trials and suggest vinorelbine should be considered a valid treatment option for patients with ABC and a potential component in future combination regimens for this disease.

scholarly journals Fluropyrimidine single agent or doublet chemotherapy as second line treatment in advanced biliary tract cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 147 (11) ◽  
pp. 3177-3188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Neuzillet ◽  
Andrea Casadei‐Gardini ◽  
Bertrand Brieau ◽  
Caterina Vivaldi ◽  
Giovanni Brandi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Doublet Chemotherapy

Single agent gemcitabine in the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer after treatment with taxane + platinum regimens

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugur Coskun ◽  
Ali Osman Kaya ◽  
Süleyman Buyukberber ◽  
Mustafa Benekli ◽  
Aytug Uner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Small Cell Lung

High efficacy and low toxicity of the combination of vinorelbine and capecitabine as second line treatment in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes and/or anthracyclines

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10719-10719 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Orphanos ◽  
A. Alexopoulos ◽  
G. Ioannidis ◽  
C. Kandylis ◽  
A. Ardavanis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Statistical Planning ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Ecog Ps

10719 Background: Capecitabine and Vinorelbine have shown considerable activity given as single agent or in combination with other drugs. The aim of this single institution ph.II study is to evaluate the response to the combination of Capecitabine and Vinorelbine given as second line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes and/or anthracyclines. Methods: The regimen consists of Capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 D1-D14 and Vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 D1,D8 q 3 weeks for six cycles. Evaluation of response was accomplished with CT scan after the third and sixth cycle. Patients with disease progression after cycle 3 are taken off protocol. Patients with gr 2/3 granulocytopenia are given G-CSF for all subsequent cycles and there is a 20% dose reduction in both drugs for patients with gr 4 granulocytopenia. Results: 30 pts have been enrolled so far; according to statistical planning the total number of accrued pts should reach 63. Median age 55 yrs (30–76), median ECOG PS 1 (0–2), pre/postmenopausal 6/24. Number of metastatic sites: 1 in 6 pts, 2 in 15 pts, 3 in 6 pts and 4 in 3 pts. A total of 146 cycles was administered. Overall response rate 50% with CR in 2 (6.7%) pts, PR in 13 (43.3%) pts. Stable disease was observed in 4 (13.3%) pts, 8 (26.6%) pts had progressive disease and 3 (10%) were non evaluable. Toxicity: anemia gr 2 in 2 (6.7%) pts and gr 3 in 1 (3.3%) ptn, thrombocytopenia gr2 in 2 (6.7%) pts, granulocytopenia gr 2/3 in 17 (56.7%) pts and gr4 in 1 (3.3%) ptn. Gr 1/2 nausea or vomiting was observed in 5 (16.6%) pts and gr 3/4 in 2 (6.7%) pts. Vinorelbine induced phlebitis in 3 (10%) pts, gr1/2 diarrhea in 3 (10%) and fungal infection of the nail beds in 2 (6.7%) pts. Conclusions: Preleminary results suggest that the Capecitabine and Vinorelbine combination is an active and safe regimen for second line metastatic breast cancer treatment. The study remains open to achieve the planned patient accrual. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Feasibility of sequential fixed S-1 followed by paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15113-15113
Author(s):  
M. Ohashi ◽  
T. Kanda ◽  
K. Yajima ◽  
H. Honma ◽  
S. Kosugi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Recurrent Gastric Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

15113 Background: First-line chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer has limited efficacy, achieving a median survival time (MST) of about 7 months, while addition of second-line and subsequent chemotherapy may prolong MST to about 11.5 months. In practice, however, about half of patients failing with first-line chemotherapy are unable to receive second-line chemotherapy because of worsening of their performance status (PS), disease progression, or toxicities during protracted first-line chemotherapy. We studied the feasibility of a sequential fixed regimen devised to ensure prompt initiation of second-line chemotherapy after first-line failure. Methods: Between December 2002 and December 2006, patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer were enrolled who met the following requirements: 1) major organ function preserved; 2) PS 0–2; 3) presence of at least one evaluable lesion; and 4) written informed consent. The treatment regimen consisted of 3 courses of single-agent S-1 or S-1/cisplatin combination followed by weekly paclitaxel (wPTX). The endpoints of the study were entry to the second-line treatment, time to failure (TTF), and MST. Results: Of 39 patients enrolled, 37 completed first- line S-1. Twenty-eight patients (76%) then received wPTX, 2 non-wPTX chemotherapy, and 6 surgery; only 1 received no additional treatments. Second-line wPTX was followed by a third-line treatment in 23/28 patients (82%). The TTF with the sequential fixed regimen was 7 months. The MST and the 1- and 2-year survival rates in the 37 completing first-line treatment were 14.6 months, 61% and 25%, while those in the 28 switched over to wPTX were 12.5 months, 51% and 17%. Conclusions: Patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer treated sequentially with a fixed number of courses of S-1 followed by wPTX may have a good chance of treatment continuation. A sequential fixed regimen may further improve survival of patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer only with combinations of currently available drugs. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Irinotecan monotherapy as second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15111-15111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Park ◽  
S. Yi ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
I. Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles

15111 Background: The aim of this phase II study was to determine whether second line therapy with single agent irinotecan could provide any clinical benefit in patients with gemcitabine- pretreated advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: From January 2004 to October 2006, patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine alone or combination were treated with single agent irinotecan(150 mg/m2, biweekly), until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was response rate with single stage design. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled(22 male, 6 female, median age : 54.5 years (39–76)). Nine patients are still alive and 3 remain on therapy with stable disease. The median number of cycles was 3.5(1–12). Twenty-four patients were assessable for toxicity and 21 for response. The most common toxicities was diarrhea (grade 3, 12.5%). Grade 3 neutropenia in 1 patient was observed. Other hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Partial responses were observed in 3 patients (3/21, 14%). An additional 9 patients (9/21, 43%) had stable disease as their best response. 12 patients have progressed with a median time-to-progression of 4.0 months. Conclusions: Single-agent irinotecan was tolerated with manageable toxicity, offering encouraging activity as second-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, refractory to gemcitabine. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document