scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of TCMI in Patients With Combined Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penglu Wei ◽  
Kuo Yang ◽  
Dehuai Long ◽  
Yupei Tan ◽  
Wenlong Xing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Effectiveness Rate

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of conventional treatments (CTs) to those that included traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) in patients with combined coronary heart disease and heart failure (CHD-HF).Methods: Eight electronic literature databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database) were searched from their inceptions to May 18, 2021, to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes analyzed included the total effectiveness rate and adverse events (ADRs). The secondary outcomes analyzed included the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and 6-min walk test (6MWT). Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess quality of the analyzed RCTs. Stata and OpenBUGS software were used to prior to the systematic review and network meta-analysis.Results: Sixty-one eligible trials involved 5,567 patients and one of the following 15 TCMIs: Shuxuetong, Shenmai, Shenfu, Shengmai, Danshenduofenyansuan, Danhong, Dazhuhongjingtian, Xinmailong, Dengzhanxixin, Gualoupi, Shuxuening, Xuesaitong, Yiqi Fumai, Shenqi Fuzheng, Huangqi. Network meta-analysis revealed that Shuxuetong injection + CT group was superior to CT only in improving the total effectiveness rate [odds ratio (OR): 7.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17–27.41]. Shenmai injection + CT was superior to CT only for LVEF (OR: 8.97, CI: 4.67–13.18), Xinmailong injection + CT was superior to CT only for NT-proBNP (OR: −317.70, CI: −331.10–303.10), Shenqi Fuzheng injection + CT was superior to CT only for BNP (OR: −257.30, CI: −308.40–242.80); and Danhong injection + CT was superior to CT only for 6MWT (OR: 84.40, CI: 62.62−106.20). Different TCMIs had different toxicity spectrums.Conclusion: TCMIs combined with CT are better than CT alone in treating CHD-HF. Different TCMIs improve different outcomes. Additional properly designed RCTs are needed to conduce a more refined comparison of various TCMIs.Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42021258263].

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Xue-Fu-Zhu-Yu Decoction for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Shuo Zhang ◽  
Zhen-Lin Chen ◽  
Yu-Ping Tang ◽  
Jin-Long Duan ◽  
Kui-Wu Yao
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Blood Viscosity ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

Objective. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of XFZYD for coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods. A comprehensive literature search of randomized controlled trials using XFZYD for CHD was conducted in 10 electronic databases from their establishment to December 20, 2020. The researchers screened the relevant trials in NoteExpress, extracted the data in duplicate independently, assessed the risk of bias in the trials using the Cochrane collaboration tool, and then used Rev Man 5.3 for data analysis. Results. 30 trials with 3126 participants were included for meta-analysis. The results showed that the clinical effects of XFZYD and its combination with chemical drugs (CD) were 1.13 (RR; 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.24) and 1.26 (RR; 1.26; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.32) times those of CD, respectively. And, it could also improve electrocardiogram effect, which was 1.63 (RR; 1.63; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.53) times that of CD. XFZYD could not only decrease duration of angina pectoris and improve vascular endothelial function but also obviously reduce the TCM syndrome score. When used in combination with CD, it could also lower AF, correct the dyslipidemia, and reduce the blood viscosity. Conclusion. These results demonstrated that XFZYD had great advantages in treating CHD with no obvious adverse reactions. Therefore, it is believed that XFZYD is more suitable for CHD patients with clinical indicators of dyslipidemia, high blood viscosity, or vascular endothelial dysfunction. This study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis with some unique ways, including its comprehensiveness, large-scale search, the novelty of findings, and transparent approach.

Coronary heart disease, heart failure, and the risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1493-1504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Wolters ◽  
Reffat A. Segufa ◽  
Sirwan K.L. Darweesh ◽  
Daniel Bos ◽  
Mohammad Arfan Ikram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne H Richards ◽  
Lindsey Anderson ◽  
Caroline E Jenkinson ◽  
Ben Whalley ◽  
Karen Rees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Psychological Interventions ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Considerable Uncertainty

Background Although psychological interventions are recommended for the management of coronary heart disease (CHD), there remains considerable uncertainty regarding their effectiveness. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions for CHD. Methods The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched to April 2016. Retrieved papers, systematic reviews and trial registries were hand-searched. We included RCTs with at least 6 months of follow-up, comparing the direct effects of psychological interventions to usual care for patients following myocardial infarction or revascularisation or with a diagnosis of angina pectoris or CHD defined by angiography. Two authors screened titles for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Studies were pooled using random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression was used to explore study-level predictors. Results Thirty-five studies with 10,703 participants (median follow-up 12 months) were included. Psychological interventions led to a reduction in cardiovascular mortality (rfcelative risk 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 0.98), although no effects were observed for total mortality, myocardial infarction or revascularisation. Psychological interventions improved depressive symptoms (standardised mean difference [SMD] –0.27, 95% CI –0.39 to –0.15), anxiety (SMD –0.24, 95% CI –0.38 to –0.09) and stress (SMD –0.56, 95% CI –0.88 to –0.24) compared with controls. Conclusions We found that psychological intervention improved psychological symptoms and reduced cardiac mortality for people with CHD. However, there remains considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of these effects and the specific techniques most likely to benefit people with different presentations of CHD.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with Chinese herbal medicine in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Wang ◽  
◽  
Aidong Liu ◽  
Zhilei Wang ◽  
Yue Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Angina Pectoris ◽  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Chinese Herbal Medicine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Chinese Herbal

Review question / Objective: This study is the protocol for a systematic review to evaluate the Efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with Chinese herbal medicine in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of such combined therapy in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease, It provides a reliable scientific basis for clinicians to use this approach to treat angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. Information sources: We conducted a systematic search for relevant documents in the Chinese and English databases, and the search time is limited to November 23, 2021. The following eight databases are included : PubMed,EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), Wanfang Database.Relevant journals were searched to trace the references included in the study. Other resources will be searched if necessary.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document