scholarly journals Comparative Cardio-Renal Outcomes of Type 2 Diabetes Patients Administered Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: A Network Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuanjun Zhuo ◽  
Chongguang Lin ◽  
Chunhua Zhou ◽  
Xiangyang Gao ◽  
Hailin Shao ◽  
...  

Background: Cardio-renal profiles are available from cardiovascular outcome trials of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs).Methods: A comprehensive systematic review of Embase, Medline, Web of Knowledge, and CENTRAL databases was conducted. Randomized controlled cardiovascular outcome trials of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients administered GLP-1 RAs were included. The following primary outcomes were examined: cardiovascular death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, stroke, mortality, heart failure, hypoglycemia, pancreatitis, and thyroid carcinoma. Secondary outcomes included: composite kidney outcome, worsening kidney function, macroalbuminuria, and retinopathy.Results: Seven trials involving 56,004 patients and eight interventions were identified. Albiglutide was associated with fewer MACE and myocardial infarction events compared with lixisenatide. Lixisenatide was related to a greater number of stroke events and cardiovascular deaths compared to once-weekly semaglutide and oral semaglutide, respectively. Improved mortality was associated with oral semaglutide compared with once-weekly semaglutide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, or lixisenatide. Risks of heart failure, thyroid carcinoma, and pancreatitis were similar among all the treatments. Weighting of the nine primary outcomes identified oral semaglutide as first among the eight treatments examined. Among three of the secondary outcomes, once-weekly semaglutide ranked first. Better composite kidney outcome was observed with once-weekly semaglutide than with dulaglutide or exenatide; once-weekly semaglutide improved macroalbuminuria compared with exenatide or lixisenatide; and albiglutide, exenatide, and placebo was associated with fewer cases of retinopathy compared with once-weekly semaglutide. Meanwhile, kidney function was less likely to worsen with dulaglutide than with lixisenatide or placebo.Conclusion: Semaglutide should be considered when GLP-1 RAs are indicated for T2DM patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 318 (2) ◽  
pp. F443-F454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksander Vauvert R. Hviid ◽  
Charlotte M. Sørensen

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and strategies based on this blood sugar-reducing and appetite-suppressing hormone are used to treat obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is also present in the kidney, where it influences renal function. The effect of GLP-1 on the kidney varies between humans and rodents. The effect of GLP-1 on kidney function also seems to vary depending on its concentration and the physiological or pathological state of the kidney. In studies with rodents or humans, acute infusion of pharmacological doses of GLP-1 stimulates natriuresis and diuresis. However, the effect on the renal vasculature is less clear. In rodents, GLP-1 infusion increases renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate, suggesting renal vasodilation. In humans, only a subset of the study participants exhibits increased renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate. Differential status of kidney function and changes in renal vascular resistance of the preglomerular arterioles may account for the different responses of the human study participants. Because renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes is already at risk or compromised, understanding the effects of GLP-1R activation on kidney function in these patients is particularly important. This review examines the distribution of GLP-1R in the kidney and the effects elicited by GLP-1 or GLP-1R agonists. By integrating results from acute and chronic studies in healthy individuals and patients with type 2 diabetes along with those from rodent studies, we provide insight into how GLP-1R activation affects renal function and autoregulation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 670-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernt Johan von Scholten ◽  
Tine Willum Hansen ◽  
Jens Peter Goetze ◽  
Frederik Persson ◽  
Peter Rossing

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document