scholarly journals Language influences on numerical development—Inversion effects on multi-digit number processing

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Klein ◽  
J. Bahnmueller ◽  
A. Mann ◽  
S. Pixner ◽  
L. Kaufmann ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Hans-Christoph Nuerk ◽  
Korbinian Moeller ◽  
Klaus Willmes

Only recently the focus in numerical cognition research has considered multi-digit number processing as a relatively new and yet understudied domain in mathematical cognition. In this chapter: (i) we argue that single-digit number processing is not sufficient to understand multi-digit number processing; (ii) provide an overview on which representations and effects have been investigated for multi-digit numbers; (iii) suggest a conceptual distinction between place-identification, place-value activation, and place-value computation; (iv) identify language influences on multi-digit number processing along that conceptual distinction; and (v) argue that for numerical development indices of multi-digit number processing may be more suitable predictors of later arithmetical performance than classical single-digit measure such as the distance effect or non-numerical variables (e.g., working memory). In the final section, we summarize the important issues in multi-digit number processing, outline future directions and try to encourage readers to contribute to a new, exciting, yet understudied domain of numerical cognition.


2011 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnie Wai Lan Chan ◽  
Terry K. Au ◽  
Joey Tang

2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Moeller ◽  
S. Huber ◽  
H.-C. Nuerk ◽  
K. Willmes

2009 ◽  
Vol 217 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-177
Author(s):  
Hans-Christoph Nuerk ◽  
Martin H. Fischer ◽  
Klaus Willmes

2011 ◽  
Vol 219 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-71

This section contains a short contribution on Postgraduate Education for Dyscalculia Therapists


2012 ◽  
Vol 220 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helga Krinzinger ◽  
Guilherme Wood ◽  
Klaus Willmes

Gender differences in numerical domains have frequently been reported, but typically only from high-school age onwards. Recently, we found performance differences in favor of primary school boys in multi-digit number processing. Several underlying factors have been suggested to explain general differences in multi-digit number processing (such as visual-spatial working memory capacity), gender differences in mathematics (such as attitudes toward mathematics), and gender differences in multi-digit number processing (such as visual-spatial abilities). To date, no study has tested the concurrent impact of these factors on the development of multi-digit number processing in primary school children; thus, we applied structural equation modeling to a longitudinal dataset of 140 primary school children. Our main result was that gender exerted the strongest influence on multi-digit number processing, which was partly mediated by attitudes toward mathematics. Furthermore, general visual-spatial abilities (but not visual-spatial working memory) had a strong impact on individual differences in multi-digit number processing. These results are discussed in light of the psychobiosocial view.


2012 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 594-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Mann ◽  
Korbinian Moeller ◽  
Silvia Pixner ◽  
Liane Kaufmann ◽  
Hans-Christoph Nuerk

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Bahnmueller ◽  
Krzysztof Cipora ◽  
Silke Melanie Goebel ◽  
Hans-Christoph Nuerk ◽  
Mojtaba Soltanlou

The symbolic number comparison task has been widely used to investigate the cognitive representation and underlying processes of multi-digit number processing. The standard procedure to establish numerical distance and compatibility effects in such number comparison paradigms usually entails asking participants to indicate the larger of two presented multi-digit Arabic numbers rather than to indicate the smaller number. In terms of linguistic markedness, this procedure includes the unmarked/base form in the task instruction (i.e., large). Here we evaluate distance and compatibility effects in a three-digit number comparison task observed in Bahnmueller et al. (2015) using a marked task instruction (i.e., ‘pick the smaller number’). Moreover, we aimed at clarifying whether the markedness of task instruction influences common numerical effects and especially componential processing as indexed by compatibility effects. We instructed German- and English-speaking adults (N=52) to indicate the smaller number in a three-digit number comparison task as opposed to indicating the larger number in Bahnmueller et al. (2015). We replicated standard effects of distance and compatibility in the new pick the smaller number experiment. Moreover, when comparing our findings to Bahnmueller et al. (2015), numerical effects did not differ significantly between the two studies as indicated by both frequentist and Bayesian analysis. Taken together our data suggest that distance and compatibility effects alongside componential processing of multi-digit numbers are rather robust against variations of linguistic markedness of task instructions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Bahnmueller ◽  
Krzysztof Cipora ◽  
Silke Melanie Göbel ◽  
Hans-Christoph Nuerk ◽  
Mojtaba Soltanlou

The symbolic number comparison task has been widely used to investigate the cognitive representation and underlying processes of multi-digit number processing. The standard procedure to establish numerical distance and compatibility effects in such number comparison paradigms usually entails asking participants to indicate the larger of two presented multi-digit Arabic numbers rather than to indicate the smaller number. In terms of linguistic markedness, this procedure includes the unmarked/base form in the task instruction (i.e., large). Here we evaluate distance and compatibility effects in a three-digit number comparison task observed in Bahnmueller et al. (2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01216) using a marked task instruction (i.e., ‘pick the smaller number’). Moreover, we aimed at clarifying whether the markedness of task instruction influences common numerical effects and especially componential processing as indexed by compatibility effects. We instructed German- and English-speaking adults (N = 52) to indicate the smaller number in a three-digit number comparison task as opposed to indicating the larger number in Bahnmueller et al. (2015). We replicated standard effects of distance and compatibility in the new pick the smaller number experiment. Moreover, when comparing our findings to Bahnmueller et al. (2015), numerical effects did not differ significantly between the two studies as indicated by both frequentist and Bayesian analysis. Taken together our data suggest that distance and compatibility effects alongside componential processing of multi-digit numbers are rather robust against variations of linguistic markedness of task instructions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1142-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Bahnmueller ◽  
Carolin A. Maier ◽  
Silke M. Göbel ◽  
Korbinian Moeller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document