scholarly journals Grade-Level Differences in Teacher Feedback and Students’ Self-Regulated Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjuan Guo
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-60
Author(s):  
Nanin Verina Widya Putri ◽  
Ahmad Munir ◽  
Syafi’ul Anam

Teacher feedback is useful information for EFL students’ improvement. It assists students to know their weaknesses and strengths in English learning. However, students might perceive teacher feedback differently from the teacher's intentions. This study examined students’ perceptions of their teacher feedback in English class and investigated their self-regulated learning after receiving feedback. It is a descriptive-qualitative study involving ten EFL students of the senior high school using semi-structured interview questions through online communication. Subsequently, the data were transcribed and analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis of students’ perceptions of teacher feedback and their self-regulated learning. The finding showed that the students perceived teacher feedback as positive and negative. Upon receiving teacher feedback, the students developed their self-regulated learning, such as setting goals, monitoring, self-motivating, seeking-help, adopting, and self-evaluating in English learning. This study offers implications for English teachers and educators to improve their feedback quality in English classroom assessment.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Gunawan Gunawan ◽  
Ambar Prawoto ◽  
Utari Sumarmo

This study was a descriptive survey having a goal to examine attainment of student’s mathematical reasoning (MR) and  self regulated learning(SRL) according to  student’s cognitive stage. The survey   implicate  36 eleventh grade students of  17... years old,  test of logical thinking (TOLT), an essay  MR test,a  SRL scale. By using TOLT, the survey investigated  many students with 17 years old had not reached formal cognitive stage, namely 19 %  students at formal stage, 25 % students at transition stage, and  rest 56% students at concrete stage. In addition, survey invented that entirely students obtained MR at very low grade level, and according to student’s cognitive stage, formal students obtained higher grade MR than the grade of transisiton students and concrete students. Even if, those grades were still at low and very low level. Either entirely or based on student’s cognitive stage  there were no different grades on student’s SRL and those grade were fairly good level. SRL at fairly good grade level, transistion stage students attained  MR and SRL at medium grade Other finding, there was medium association between cognitive stage and MR, but therewere no association between cognitive stage and MR, and SRL and between MR and SRL. In general, these findings were, that in normal condition formal cgnitive stage will reach by students in 12 -13 years old, or in 13-14 years old, even in specific condition in 19 – 20 years old; and that formal students possess higher abilities than concrete students on completing HOT tasks such as MR tasks which needed formal operational thinking.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-308
Author(s):  
Mohammadreza Valizadeh

This study investigated the level of self-efficacy beliefs of Turkish university learners who majored in English. Moreover, the effects of demographic factors of gender, grade level, types of initial motivation to enter a university, and living circumstances on participants’ self-efficacy levels were explored. The participants were 301 undergraduate Turkish university learners who majored in English. Their self-efficacy was evaluated using a students’ self-efficacy scale, which measured their self-efficacy within the category of self-efficacy for self-regulated learning. The data were analysed quantitatively. A relatively good (moderate) level of self-efficacy for self-regulated learning was found for Turkish English as a Foreign Language (EFL) university learners. There was a significant difference between the self-efficacy of males and females in favour of females. However, the magnitude of the differences in the means was below medium. Moreover, the participants’ self-efficacy level did not vary by grade level and living circumstances (i.e., living alone, living with parents, living in a shared room/apartment, living in a dormitory) during the academic year. Additionally, there was not a significant difference in the self-efficacy levels of the group with initial intrinsic motivation and the group with initial extrinsic motivation to enter a university. The results of this research can be insightful for the field of educational psychology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document