scholarly journals The Psychometric Properties and Clinical Utility of the Korean Version of GAD-7 and GAD-2

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Kwang Ahn ◽  
Yeseul Kim ◽  
Kee-Hong Choi
BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e021734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Griffiths ◽  
Rachel Toovey ◽  
Prue E Morgan ◽  
Alicia J Spittle

ObjectiveGross motor assessment tools have a critical role in identifying, diagnosing and evaluating motor difficulties in childhood. The objective of this review was to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical utility of gross motor assessment tools for children aged 2–12 years.MethodA systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and AMED was performed between May and July 2017. Methodological quality was assessed with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments checklist and an outcome measures rating form was used to evaluate reliability, validity and clinical utility of assessment tools.ResultsSeven assessment tools from 37 studies/manuals met the inclusion criteria: Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development-III (Bayley-III), Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2), Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2), McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development (MAND), Neurological Sensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA), Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2) and Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2). Methodological quality varied from poor to excellent. Validity and internal consistency varied from fair to excellent (α=0.5–0.99). The Bayley-III, NSMDA and MABC-2 have evidence of predictive validity. Test–retest reliability is excellent in the BOT-2 (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.80–0.99), PDMS-2 (ICC=0.97), MABC-2 (ICC=0.83–0.96) and TGMD-2 (ICC=0.81–0.92). TGMD-2 has the highest inter-rater (ICC=0.88–0.93) and intrarater reliability (ICC=0.92–0.99).ConclusionsThe majority of gross motor assessments for children have good-excellent validity. Test–retest reliability is highest in the BOT-2, MABC-2, PDMS-2 and TGMD-2. The Bayley-III has the best predictive validity at 2 years of age for later motor outcome. None of the assessment tools demonstrate good evaluative validity. Further research on evaluative gross motor assessment tools are urgently needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-418
Author(s):  
Srividya N Iyer ◽  
Megan A Pope ◽  
Gerald Jordan ◽  
Greeshma Mohan ◽  
Heleen Loohuis ◽  
...  

Objectives: Views on who bears how much responsibility for supporting individuals with mental health problems may vary across stakeholders (patients, families, clinicians) and cultures. Perceptions about responsibility may influence the extent to which stakeholders get involved in treatment. Our objective was to report on the development, psychometric properties and usability of a first-ever tool of this construct. Methods: We created a visual weighting disk called ‘ShareDisk’, measuring perceived extent of responsibility for supporting persons with mental health problems. It was administered (twice, 2 weeks apart) to patients, family members and clinicians in Chennai, India ( N = 30, 30 and 15, respectively) and Montreal, Canada ( N = 30, 32 and 15, respectively). Feedback regarding its usability was also collected. Results: The English, French and Tamil versions of the ShareDisk demonstrated high test–retest reliability ( rs = .69–.98) and were deemed easy to understand and use. Conclusion: The ShareDisk is a promising measure of a hitherto unmeasured construct that is easily deployable in settings varying in language and literacy levels. Its clinical utility lies in clarifying stakeholder roles. It can help researchers investigate how stakeholders’ roles are perceived and how these perceptions may be shaped by and shape the organization and experience of healthcare across settings.


2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Hui Kim ◽  
Yoonseok Huh ◽  
Jin Yeong Choe ◽  
Ji Woon Jeong ◽  
Joon Hyuk Park ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bumseok Jeong ◽  
Sang Won Lee ◽  
Jong-Sun Lee ◽  
Jae Hyun Yoo ◽  
Ko Woon Kim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren G. Staples ◽  
Blake F. Dear ◽  
Milena Gandy ◽  
Vincent Fogliati ◽  
Rhiannon Fogliati ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abu Minhajuddin ◽  
Manish K. Jha ◽  
Cherise Chin Fatt ◽  
Madhukar H. Trivedi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document