scholarly journals Is Our Understanding of Solar-Wind/Magnetosphere Coupling Satisfactory?

Author(s):  
Joseph E. Borovsky

An assessment of our physics-based understanding of solar-wind/magnetosphere coupling finds that the understanding is not complete. Solar-wind/magnetosphere coupling is foundational to magnetospheric physics and it is a key to comprehending and predicting space weather. We are modestly successful at correlating solar-wind variables with geomagnetic indices, but we lack the full knowledge to describe in detail how the shocked solar-wind plasma transports mass, momentum, and energy into the magnetosphere-ionosphere system and how the shocked solar wind drives geomagnetic activity and magnetospheric evolution. The controlling solar-wind factors that govern the driving of the magnetosphere-ionosphere system are not accurately known. Without this knowledge accurate predictions of the magnetospheric behavior cannot be made and no magnetosphere-ionosphere model will work correctly if it is driven incorrectly. Further, without a fundamental understanding, the prediction of the system reaction to some as-yet-unseen extreme solar-wind conditions will not be possible. In this perspective article several gaps in our knowledge are cataloged. The deficiencies in our physical understanding of solar-wind/magnetosphere coupling constitute a major unsolved problem for space physics (and for astrophysics), a problem that demands enhanced, coordinated research.

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (S257) ◽  
pp. 61-63
Author(s):  
Marina Laskari ◽  
Panagiota Preka-Papadema ◽  
Constantine Caroubalos ◽  
George Pothitakis ◽  
Xenophon Moussas ◽  
...  

AbstractWe study the geoeffectiveness of a sample of complex events; each includes a coronal type II burst, accompanied by a GOES SXR flare and LASCO CME. The radio bursts were recorded by the ARTEMIS-IV radio spectrograph, in the 100-650 MHz range; the GOES SXR flares and SOHO/LASCO CMEs, were obtained from the Solar Geophysical Data (SGD) and the LASCO catalogue respectively. These are compared with changes of solar wind parameters and geomagnetic indices in order to establish a relationship between solar energetic events and their effects on geomagnetic activity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauri Holappa ◽  
Timo Asikainen ◽  
Kalevi Mursula

<p>The interaction of the solar wind with the Earth’s magnetic field produces geomagnetic activity, which is critically dependent on the orientation of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). Most solar wind coupling functions quantify this dependence on the IMF orientation with the so-called IMF clock angle in a way, which is symmetric with respect to the sign of the B<sub>y</sub> component. However, recent studies have shown that IMF B<sub>y</sub> is an additional, independent driver of high-latitude geomagnetic activity, leading to higher (weaker) geomagnetic activity in Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter for B<sub>y</sub> > 0 (B<sub>y</sub> < 0). For NH summer the dependence on the B<sub>y</sub> sign is reversed. We quantify the size of this explicit B<sub>y</sub>-effect with respect to the solar wind coupling function, both for northern and southern high-latitude geomagnetic activity. We show that for a given value of solar wind coupling function, geomagnetic activity is about 40% stronger for B<sub>y</sub> > 0 than for B<sub>y</sub> < 0 in NH winter. We also discuss recent advances in the physical understanding of the B<sub>y</sub>-effect. Our results highlight the importance of the IMF B<sub>y</sub>-component for space weather and must be taken into account in future space weather modeling.</p>


2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 907-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Lyatsky ◽  
A M Hamza

A possible test for different models explaining the seasonal variation in geomagnetic activity is the diurnal variation. We computed diurnal variations both in the occurrence of large AE (auroral electrojet) indices and in the AO index. (AO is the auroral electrojet index that provides a measure of the equivalent zonal current.) Both methods show a similar diurnal variation in geomagnetic activity with a deep minimum around (3–7) UT (universal time) in winter and a shallower minimum near 5–9 UT in equinoctial months. The observed UT variation is consistent with the results of other scientists, but it is different from that expected from the Russell–McPherron mechanism proposed to explain the seasonal variation. It is suggested that the possible cause for the diurnal and seasonal variations may be variations in nightside ionospheric conductivity. Recent experimental results show an important role for ionospheric conductivity in particle acceleration and geomagnetic disturbance generation. They also show that low ionospheric conductivity is favorable to the generation of auroral and geomagnetic activity. The conductivity in conjugate nightside auroral zones (where substorm generation takes place) is minimum at equinoxes, when both auroral zones are in darkness. The low ionospheric conductivity at equinoxes may be a possible cause for the seasonal variation in the geomagnetic activity with maxima in equinoctial months. The diurnal variation in geomagnetic activity can be produced by the UT variation in the nightside ionospheric conductivity, which in winter and at equinoxes has a maximum around 4–5 UT that may lead to a minimum in geomagnetic activity at this time. We calculated the correlation patterns for the AE index versus solar-wind parameters inside and outside the (2–7) UT sector related to the minimum in geomagnetic activity. The correlation patterns appear different in these two sectors indeed, which is well consistent with the UT variation in geomagnetic activity. It also shows that it is possible to improve significantly the reliability of the Space Weather forecast by taking into account the dependence of geomagnetic activity not only on solar-wind parameters but also on UT and season. Our test shows that a simple account for the dependence of geomagnetic activity on UT can improve the reliability of the Space Weather forecast by at least 50% in the 2–7 UT sector in winter and equinoctial months. PACS No.: 91.25Le


2020 ◽  
Vol 896 (2) ◽  
pp. 149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Telloni ◽  
Francesco Carbone ◽  
Ester Antonucci ◽  
Roberto Bruno ◽  
Catia Grimani ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 64 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 737-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Dalin ◽  
Georgy Zastenker ◽  
Karolen Paularena ◽  
John Richardson

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Matzka ◽  
Guram Kervalishvili ◽  
Jan Rauberg ◽  
Claudia Stolle ◽  
Yosuke Yamazaki

<p>An open-ended, high cadence, Kp-like geomagnetic index, called Hp index, is developed within the H2020 project SWAMI (Space Weather Atmosphere Models and Indices). The traditional Kp index is an excellent measure for energy input by the solar wind and is widely used in space weather science and applications. The new planetary index Hp resembles the Kp index by having a similar derivation scheme and a nearly identical frequency distribution of index values. Hp is available from 1995 onward with different time resolutions, e.g., 30 minutes and 60 minutes, and thus provides a higher temporal resolution than the 3-hourly Kp index. Additionally, events with Hp > 9- were further subdivided using an open-ended scale (9o, 9+, 10-, 10o, 10+, 11-, ...) to represent the highest levels of geomagnetic activity with higher resolution.</p>


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 3989-3998 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Saiz ◽  
C. Cid ◽  
Y. Cerrato

Abstract. Southward interplanetary magnetic fields are considered traces of geoeffectiveness since they are a main agent of magnetic reconnection of solar wind and magnetosphere. The first part of this work revises the ability to forecast intense geomagnetic activity using different procedures available in the literature. The study shows that current methods do not succeed in making confident predictions. This fact led us to develop a new forecasting procedure, which provides trustworthy results in predicting large variations of Dst index over a sample of 10 years of observations and is based on the value Bz only. The proposed forecasting method appears as a worthy tool for space weather purposes because it is not affected by the lack of solar wind plasma data, which usually occurs during severe geomagnetic activity. Moreover, the results obtained guide us to provide a new interpretation of the physical mechanisms involved in the interaction between the solar wind and the magnetosphere using Faraday's law.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andong Hu ◽  
Jannis Teunissen ◽  
Manuela Sisti ◽  
Francesco Califano ◽  
Jérémy Dargent ◽  
...  

<div>The understanding of fundamental processes at play in a collisionless plasmas such as the solar wind, is a frontier problem in space physics. We investigate here the occurrence of magnetic reconnection in a plasma with parameters corresponding to solar wind plasma and its interplay with a fully-developed turbulent state. Ongoing magnetic reconnection can, at the moment, be accurately identified only by humans. Therefore, as a first step, the goal of this study is to present a new method to automatically recognise reconnection events in the output of two-dimensional HVM (Hybrid Vlasov Maxwell) simulations where ions evolve by solving the Vlasov equation and the electrons are treated as a fluid with mass. A large dataset with labelled reconnection events was prepared, including parameters such as the magnetic field, the electron velocity field and the current density. We consider two types of machine learning models: classical approaches using on physics-based features, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We will investigate which approach performs better, and which input variables are most relevant. In addition, we will try to categorize magnetic reconnection regions (current sheets). This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776262 (AIDA, www.aida-space.eu).</div>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauri Holappa ◽  
Timo Asikainen ◽  
Kalevi Mursula

<p>The interaction of the solar wind with the Earth’s magnetic field produces geomagnetic activity, which is critically dependent on the orientation of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). Most solar wind coupling functions quantify this dependence on the IMF orientation with the so-called IMF clock angle in a way, which is symmetric with respect to the sign of the By component. However, recent studies have shown that IMF By is an additional, independent driver of high-latitude geomagnetic activity, leading to higher (weaker) geomagnetic activity in Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter for By > 0 (By < 0). For NH summer the dependence on the By sign is reversed. We quantify the size of this explicit By-effect with respect to the solar wind coupling function, both for northern and southern high-latitude geomagnetic activity. We show that for a given value of solar wind coupling function, geomagnetic activity is about 40% stronger for By > 0 than for By < 0 in NH winter. The physical mechanism of the By-effect is not yet fully understood. Here we show that IMF By modulates the flux of energetic electrons precipitating into the ionosphere which likely modulates the ionospheric conductivity and, thus, geomagnetic activity. Our results highlight the importance of the IMF By-component for space weather and must be taken into account in future space weather modeling.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Balveer S. Rathore ◽  
Dinesh C. Gupta ◽  
Subhash C. Kaushik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document