scholarly journals Privacy-Preserving Monotonicity of Differential Privacy Mechanisms

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 2081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai Liu ◽  
Zhenqiang Wu ◽  
Yihui Zhou ◽  
Changgen Peng ◽  
Feng Tian ◽  
...  

Differential privacy mechanisms can offer a trade-off between privacy and utility by using privacy metrics and utility metrics. The trade-off of differential privacy shows that one thing increases and another decreases in terms of privacy metrics and utility metrics. However, there is no unified trade-off measurement of differential privacy mechanisms. To this end, we proposed the definition of privacy-preserving monotonicity of differential privacy, which measured the trade-off between privacy and utility. First, to formulate the trade-off, we presented the definition of privacy-preserving monotonicity based on computational indistinguishability. Second, building on privacy metrics of the expected estimation error and entropy, we theoretically and numerically showed privacy-preserving monotonicity of Laplace mechanism, Gaussian mechanism, exponential mechanism, and randomized response mechanism. In addition, we also theoretically and numerically analyzed the utility monotonicity of these several differential privacy mechanisms based on utility metrics of modulus of characteristic function and variant of normalized entropy. Third, according to the privacy-preserving monotonicity of differential privacy, we presented a method to seek trade-off under a semi-honest model and analyzed a unilateral trade-off under a rational model. Therefore, privacy-preserving monotonicity can be used as a criterion to evaluate the trade-off between privacy and utility in differential privacy mechanisms under the semi-honest model. However, privacy-preserving monotonicity results in a unilateral trade-off of the rational model, which can lead to severe consequences.

Author(s):  
Caroline Uhler ◽  
Aleksandra B. Slavkovic ◽  
Stephen E. Fienberg

Traditional statistical methods for confidentiality protection of statistical databases do not scale well to deal with GWAS databases especially in terms of guarantees regarding protection from linkage to external information. The more recent concept of differential privacy, introduced by the cryptographic community, is an approach which provides a rigorous definition of privacy with meaningful privacy guarantees in the presence of arbitrary external information, although the guarantees may come at a serious price in terms of data utility. Building on such notions, we propose new methods to release aggregate GWAS data without compromising an individual’s privacy. We present methods for releasing differentially private minor allele frequencies, chi-square statistics and p-values. We compare these approaches on simulated data and on a GWAS study of canine hair length involving 685 dogs. We also propose a privacy-preserving method for finding genome-wide associations based on a differentially-private approach to penalized logistic regression.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Fanti ◽  
Vasyl Pihur ◽  
Úlfar Erlingsson

Abstract Techniques based on randomized response enable the collection of potentially sensitive data from clients in a privacy-preserving manner with strong local differential privacy guarantees. A recent such technology, RAPPOR [12], enables estimation of the marginal frequencies of a set of strings via privacy-preserving crowdsourcing. However, this original estimation process relies on a known dictionary of possible strings; in practice, this dictionary can be extremely large and/or unknown. In this paper, we propose a novel decoding algorithm for the RAPPOR mechanism that enables the estimation of “unknown unknowns,” i.e., strings we do not know we should be estimating. To enable learning without explicit dictionary knowledge, we develop methodology for estimating the joint distribution of multiple variables collected with RAPPOR. Our contributions are not RAPPOR-specific, and can be generalized to other local differential privacy mechanisms for learning distributions of string-valued random variables.


Author(s):  
Dan Wang ◽  
Ju Ren ◽  
Zhibo Wang ◽  
Xiaoyi Pang ◽  
Yaoxue Zhang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 42-60
Author(s):  
Ting Bao ◽  
Lei Xu ◽  
Liehuang Zhu ◽  
Lihong Wang ◽  
Ruiguang Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengqian Li ◽  
Youliang Tian ◽  
Junpeng Zhang ◽  
Dandan Fan ◽  
Dongmei Zhao

Author(s):  
Shushu Liu ◽  
An Liu ◽  
Zhixu Li ◽  
Guanfeng Liu ◽  
Jiajie Xu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document