scholarly journals Insight into Calcium-Binding Motifs of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1173
Author(s):  
Estella A. Newcombe ◽  
Catarina B. Fernandes ◽  
Jeppe E. Lundsgaard ◽  
Inna Brakti ◽  
Kresten Lindorff-Larsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Binding ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Binding Motifs ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Ef Hand ◽  
Folded Proteins ◽  
Affinity Quantification

Motifs within proteins help us categorize their functions. Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are rich in short linear motifs, conferring them many different roles. IDPs are also frequently highly charged and, therefore, likely to interact with ions. Canonical calcium-binding motifs, such as the EF-hand, often rely on the formation of stabilizing flanking helices, which are a key characteristic of folded proteins, but are absent in IDPs. In this study, we probe the existence of a calcium-binding motif relevant to IDPs. Upon screening several carefully selected IDPs using NMR spectroscopy supplemented with affinity quantification by colorimetric assays, we found calcium-binding motifs in IDPs which could be categorized into at least two groups—an Excalibur-like motif, sequentially similar to the EF-hand loop, and a condensed-charge motif carrying repetitive negative charges. The motifs show an affinity for calcium typically in the ~100 μM range relevant to regulatory functions and, while calcium binding to the condensed-charge motif had little effect on the overall compaction of the IDP chain, calcium binding to Excalibur-like motifs resulted in changes in compaction. Thus, calcium binding to IDPs may serve various structural and functional roles that have previously been underreported.

scholarly journals Zooming into the Dark Side of Human Annexin-S100 Complexes: Dynamic Alliance of Flexible Partners

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5879
Author(s):  
Judith Weisz ◽  
Vladimir N. Uversky
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Binding ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
S100 Proteins ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Ef Hand

Annexins and S100 proteins form two large families of Ca2+-binding proteins. They are quite different both structurally and functionally, with S100 proteins being small (10–12 kDa) acidic regulatory proteins from the EF-hand superfamily of Ca2+-binding proteins, and with annexins being at least three-fold larger (329 ± 12 versus 98 ± 7 residues) and using non-EF-hand-based mechanism for calcium binding. Members of both families have multiple biological roles, being able to bind to a large cohort of partners and possessing a multitude of functions. Furthermore, annexins and S100 proteins can interact with each other in either a Ca2+-dependent or Ca2+-independent manner, forming functional annexin-S100 complexes. Such functional polymorphism and binding indiscrimination are rather unexpected, since structural information is available for many annexins and S100 proteins, which therefore are considered as ordered proteins that should follow the classical “one protein–one structure–one function” model. On the other hand, the ability to be engaged in a wide range of interactions with multiple, often unrelated, binding partners and possess multiple functions represent characteristic features of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs); i.e., functional proteins or protein regions lacking unique tertiary structures. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the functional roles of human annexins and S100 proteins, and to use the protein intrinsic disorder perspective to explain their exceptional multifunctionality and binding promiscuity.

scholarly journals Co-Evolution of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins with Folded Partners Witnessed by Evolutionary Couplings

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 3315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Pancsa ◽  
Fruzsina Zsolyomi ◽  
Peter Tompa
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Structures ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Cellular Interaction ◽  
Structural Constraints ◽  
Protein Residues ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Evolutionary Changes ◽  
Folded Proteins

Although improved strategies for the detection and analysis of evolutionary couplings (ECs) between protein residues already enable the prediction of protein structures and interactions, they are mostly restricted to conserved and well-folded proteins. Whereas intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are central to cellular interaction networks, due to the lack of strict structural constraints, they undergo faster evolutionary changes than folded domains. This makes the reliable identification and alignment of IDP homologs difficult, which led to IDPs being omitted in most large-scale residue co-variation analyses. By preforming a dedicated analysis of phylogenetically widespread bacterial IDP–partner interactions, here we demonstrate that partner binding imposes constraints on IDP sequences that manifest in detectable interprotein ECs. These ECs were not detected for interactions mediated by short motifs, rather for those with larger IDP–partner interfaces. Most identified coupled residue pairs reside close (<10 Å) to each other on the interface, with a third of them forming multiple direct atomic contacts. EC-carrying interfaces of IDPs are enriched in negatively charged residues, and the EC residues of both IDPs and partners preferentially reside in helices. Our analysis brings hope that IDP–partner interactions difficult to study could soon be successfully dissected through residue co-variation analysis.

scholarly journals Transient Secondary Structures as General Target-Binding Motifs in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 3614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Do-Hyoung Kim ◽  
Kyou-Hoon Han
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Secondary Structures ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Binding Motifs ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Science Community ◽  
Target Binding

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are unorthodox proteins that do not form three-dimensional structures under non-denaturing conditions, but perform important biological functions. In addition, IDPs are associated with many critical diseases including cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, and viral diseases. Due to the generic name of “unstructured” proteins used for IDPs in the early days, the notion that IDPs would be completely unstructured down to the level of secondary structures has prevailed for a long time. During the last two decades, ample evidence has been accumulated showing that IDPs in their target-free state are pre-populated with transient secondary structures critical for target binding. Nevertheless, such a message did not seem to have reached with sufficient clarity to the IDP or protein science community largely because similar but different expressions were used to denote the fundamentally same phenomenon of presence of such transient secondary structures, which is not surprising for a quickly evolving field. Here, we summarize the critical roles that these transient secondary structures play for diverse functions of IDPs by describing how various expressions referring to transient secondary structures have been used in different contexts.

scholarly journals Structural and Dynamical Order of a Disordered Protein: Molecular Insights into Conformational Switching of PAGE4 at the Systems Level

Biomolecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingcheng Lin ◽  
Prakash Kulkarni ◽  
Federico Bocci ◽  
Nicholas Schafer ◽  
Susmita Roy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Conformational Dynamics ◽  
Structural Plasticity ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Related Disorder ◽  
Structural Ordering ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Collective Motions ◽  
Folded Proteins

Folded proteins show a high degree of structural order and undergo (fairly constrained) collective motions related to their functions. On the other hand, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), while lacking a well-defined three-dimensional structure, do exhibit some structural and dynamical ordering, but are less constrained in their motions than folded proteins. The larger structural plasticity of IDPs emphasizes the importance of entropically driven motions. Many IDPs undergo function-related disorder-to-order transitions driven by their interaction with specific binding partners. As experimental techniques become more sensitive and become better integrated with computational simulations, we are beginning to see how the modest structural ordering and large amplitude collective motions of IDPs endow them with an ability to mediate multiple interactions with different partners in the cell. To illustrate these points, here, we use Prostate-associated gene 4 (PAGE4), an IDP implicated in prostate cancer (PCa) as an example. We first review our previous efforts using molecular dynamics simulations based on atomistic AWSEM to study the conformational dynamics of PAGE4 and how its motions change in its different physiologically relevant phosphorylated forms. Our simulations quantitatively reproduced experimental observations and revealed how structural and dynamical ordering are encoded in the sequence of PAGE4 and can be modulated by different extents of phosphorylation by the kinases HIPK1 and CLK2. This ordering is reflected in changing populations of certain secondary structural elements as well as in the regularity of its collective motions. These ordered features are directly correlated with the functional interactions of WT-PAGE4, HIPK1-PAGE4 and CLK2-PAGE4 with the AP-1 signaling axis. These interactions give rise to repeated transitions between (high HIPK1-PAGE4, low CLK2-PAGE4) and (low HIPK1-PAGE4, high CLK2-PAGE4) cell phenotypes, which possess differing sensitivities to the standard PCa therapies, such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We argue that, although the structural plasticity of an IDP is important in promoting promiscuous interactions, the modulation of the structural ordering is important for sculpting its interactions so as to rewire with agility biomolecular interaction networks with significant functional consequences.

scholarly journals Expanding the proteome: disordered and alternatively folded proteins

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jane Dyson
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Protein Sequences ◽  
Open Reading Frames ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Characteristic Functions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Folded Proteins

AbstractProteins provide much of the scaffolding for life, as well as undertaking a variety of essential catalytic reactions. These characteristic functions have led us to presuppose that proteins are in general functional only when well structured and correctly folded. As we begin to explore the repertoire of possible protein sequences inherent in the human and other genomes, two stark facts that belie this supposition become clear: firstly, the number of apparent open reading frames in the human genome is significantly smaller than appears to be necessary to code for all of the diverse proteins in higher organisms, and secondly that a significant proportion of the protein sequences that would be coded by the genome would not be expected to form stable three-dimensional (3D) structures. Clearly the genome must include coding for a multitude of alternative forms of proteins, some of which may be partly or fully disordered or incompletely structured in their functional states. At the same time as this likelihood was recognized, experimental studies also began to uncover examples of important protein molecules and domains that were incompletely structured or completely disordered in solution, yet remained perfectly functional. In the ensuing years, we have seen an explosion of experimental and genome-annotation studies that have mapped the extent of the intrinsic disorder phenomenon and explored the possible biological rationales for its widespread occurrence. Answers to the question ‘why would a particular domain need to be unstructured?’ are as varied as the systems where such domains are found. This review provides a survey of recent new directions in this field, and includes an evaluation of the role not only of intrinsically disordered proteins but also of partially structured and highly dynamic members of the disorder–order continuum.

scholarly journals Structural Proteomics Methods to Interrogate the Conformations and Dynamics of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Beveridge ◽  
Antonio N. Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Structure And Function ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Structural Proteomics ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Folded Proteins ◽  
Structural Mass Spectrometry ◽  
And Function ◽  
Structural Mass

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and regions of intrinsic disorder (IDRs) are abundant in proteomes and are essential for many biological processes. Thus, they are often implicated in disease mechanisms, including neurodegeneration and cancer. The flexible nature of IDPs and IDRs provides many advantages, including (but not limited to) overcoming steric restrictions in binding, facilitating posttranslational modifications, and achieving high binding specificity with low affinity. IDPs adopt a heterogeneous structural ensemble, in contrast to typical folded proteins, making it challenging to interrogate their structure using conventional tools. Structural mass spectrometry (MS) methods are playing an increasingly important role in characterizing the structure and function of IDPs and IDRs, enabled by advances in the design of instrumentation and the development of new workflows, including in native MS, ion mobility MS, top-down MS, hydrogen-deuterium exchange MS, crosslinking MS, and covalent labeling. Here, we describe the advantages of these methods that make them ideal to study IDPs and highlight recent applications where these tools have underpinned new insights into IDP structure and function that would be difficult to elucidate using other methods.

scholarly journals Intrinsically disordered proteins and structured proteins with intrinsically disordered regions have different functional roles in the cell

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Deiana ◽  
Sergio Forcelloni ◽  
Alessandro Porrello ◽  
Andrea Giansanti
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
General Category ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Structured Proteins ◽  
Disordered Regions

AbstractMany studies about classification and the functional annotation of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are based on either the occurrence of long disordered regions or the fraction of disordered residues in the sequence. Taking into account both criteria we separate the human proteome, taken as a case study, into three variants of proteins: i) ordered proteins (ORDPs), ii) structured proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDPRs), and iii) intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). The focus of this work is on the different functional roles of IDPs and IDPRs, which up until now have been generally considered as a whole. Previous studies assigned a large set of functional roles to the general category of IDPs. We show here that IDPs and IDPRs have non-overlapping functional spectra, play different roles in human diseases, and deserve to be treated as distinct categories of proteins. IDPs enrich only a few classes, functions, and processes: nucleic acid binding proteins, chromatin binding proteins, transcription factors, and developmental processes. In contrast, IDPRs are spread over several functional protein classes and GO annotations which they partly share with ORDPs. As regards to diseases, we observe that IDPs enrich only cancer-related proteins, at variance with previous results reporting that IDPs are widespread also in cardiovascular and neurodegenerative pathologies. Overall, the operational separation of IDPRs from IDPs is relevant towards correct estimates of the occurrence of intrinsically disordered proteins in genome-wide studies and in the understanding of the functional spectra associated to different flavors of protein disorder.

scholarly journals Depletion interactions modulate the binding between disordered proteins in crowded environments

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (24) ◽  
pp. 13480-13489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Zosel ◽  
Andrea Soranno ◽  
Karin J. Buholzer ◽  
Daniel Nettels ◽  
Benjamin Schuler
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Dissociation Kinetics ◽  
Cellular Targets ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Functional Consequences ◽  
Folded Proteins ◽  
Depletion Interactions

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) abound in cellular regulation. Their interactions are often transitory and highly sensitive to salt concentration and posttranslational modifications. However, little is known about the effect of macromolecular crowding on the interactions of IDPs with their cellular targets. Here, we investigate the influence of crowding on the interaction between two IDPs that fold upon binding, with polyethylene glycol as a crowding agent. Single-molecule spectroscopy allows us to quantify the effects of crowding on a comprehensive set of observables simultaneously: the equilibrium stability of the complex, the association and dissociation kinetics, and the microviscosity, which governs translational diffusion. We show that a quantitative and coherent explanation of all observables is possible within the framework of depletion interactions if the polymeric nature of IDPs and crowders is incorporated based on recent theoretical developments. The resulting integrated framework can also rationalize important functional consequences, for example, that the interaction between the two IDPs is less enhanced by crowding than expected for folded proteins of the same size.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document