scholarly journals Surgery in Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 390
Author(s):  
Nicola Martucci ◽  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Antonello La Rocca ◽  
Giuseppe De Luca ◽  
Rossella De Cecio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Stage Disease

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive tumors, with a rapid growth and early metastases. Approximately 5% of SCLC patients present with early-stage disease (T1,2 N0M0): these patients have a better prognosis, with a 5-year survival up to 50%. Two randomized phase III studies conducted in the 1960s and the 1980s reported negative results with surgery in SCLC patients with early-stage disease and, thereafter, surgery has been largely discouraged. Instead, several subsequent prospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of a multimodality approach including surgery before or after chemotherapy and followed in most studies by thoracic radiotherapy, with a 5-year survival probability of 36–63% for patients with completely resected stage I SCLC. These results were substantially confirmed by retrospective studies and by large, population-based studies, conducted in the last 40 years, showing the benefit of surgery, particularly lobectomy, in selected patients with early-stage SCLC. On these bases, the International Guidelines recommend a surgical approach in selected stage I SCLC patients, after adequate staging: in these cases, lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy is considered the standard approach. In all cases, surgery can be offered only as part of a multimodal treatment, which includes chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy and after a proper multidisciplinary evaluation.

scholarly journals The Diagnostic Role of Sputum miRNA in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaoxiu Hu ◽  
Yonghe Zhao ◽  
Yanlong Yang ◽  
Zhenghai Shen ◽  
Yunchao Huang
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Diagnostic Role

Abstract Objective: Recent studies indicated sputum miRNAs may provide a promising approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosis. But some results were still inconsistent. So, we performed meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic role of sputum miRNAs for the detection of NSCLC.Methods: Eligible studies that estimated the diagnostic accuracy of sputum miRNAs in NSCLC were searched in Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Data from the eligible studies were collected and pooled; sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios, weighted symmetric summary ROC curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated by bi-variate random effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was evaluated by Q test and I2 statistics.Results: 30 studies from 16 articles were included for analysis. The overall analysis yielded the sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73–0.81) and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83–0.90), with an area under the SROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.91). Subgroup analysis revealed the diagnostic accuracy in multiple miRNAs studies was higher than single miRNA (the sensitivity, specifcity and an AUC of multiple miRNAs were 0.76, 0.88 and 0.90; and for single miRNA, it was 0.74, 0.74, and 0.80). The diagnostic performance in early stage NSCLC was also very high (the sensitivity, specifcity and an AUC of stage I/II was 0.76, 0.88 and 0.91; and for stage I, it was 0.79, 0.85, and 0.87). We also found miR-210, miR-21, miR-31 and miR-126-3p might serve as potential biomarkers for lung cancer.Conclusion: Sputum miRNAs was useful noninvasive biomarkers for NSCLC diagnosis.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy in non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Can the benefits of stage IV therapy be translated into earlier stages?

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 175883591877281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Griet Deslypere ◽  
Dorothée Gullentops ◽  
Els Wauters ◽  
Johan Vansteenkiste
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma

Over the last decade, several steps forward in the treatment of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NCSLC) were made. Examples are the use of pemetrexed, pemetrexed maintenance therapy, or bevacizumab for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. A big leap forward was the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients selected on the basis of an activating oncogene, such as epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) activating mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK) translocations. However, all of these achievements could not be translated into survival benefits when studied in randomized controlled trials in patients with nonmetastatic NSCLC. Aside from chemotherapy and targeted therapy, immunotherapy has become the third pillar in the treatment armamentarium of advanced NSCLC. Antigen-specific immunotherapy (cancer vaccination) has been disappointing in large phase III clinical trials in stages I–III NSCLC. Based on the recent breakthroughs with immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC, much hope currently rests on the use of this approach in patients with stage I–III NSCLC as well. Here we give a brief overview of how most new therapeutic approaches for advanced NSCLC failed in other stages, and then elaborate on the role of immunotherapy in patients with stage I–III NSCLC.

scholarly journals Segmentectomy or lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 1051-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Winckelmans ◽  
Herbert Decaluwé ◽  
Paul De Leyn ◽  
Dirk Van Raemdonck
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Stage Ia

Abstract OBJECTIVES The role of segmentectomy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a matter of debate. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the oncological outcomes following segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I, stage IA only and stage IA <2 cm only. METHODS We systematically searched the literature for articles reporting on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS). The hazard ratios (HRs) were retrieved and pooled using an inverse variance-weighted approach. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies were included in the analysis. In stage I, segmentectomy was found to be inferior to lobectomy for all 3 outcomes with HR: 1.25 (P = 0.01) for OS, 1.59 (P = 0.02) for CSS and 1.40 (P < 0.001) for RFS. In stage IA, the differences were significant for OS and CSS, though not for RFS with HR: 1.31 (P = 0.04), 1.56 (P = 0.02) and 1.22 (P = 0.11), respectively. In stage IA <2 cm, no significant differences were found between segmentectomy and lobectomy with HR: 1.13 (P = 0.37) for OS, 1.02 (P = 0.95) for CSS and 1.24 (P = 0.11) for RFS. CONCLUSIONS For stages I and IA, lobectomy showed superior results whereas for tumours <2 cm, our study did not find significant differences in oncological outcomes between both groups. These results suggest that segmentectomy might be a valuable alternative to lobectomy for NSCLC in tumours <2 cm.

Immunotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer—A Stimulating Partnership

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (03) ◽  
pp. 360-368
Author(s):  
Ritchell van Dams ◽  
Ye Yuan ◽  
Clifford G. Robinson ◽  
Percy Lee
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Disease

AbstractNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common subtype of lung cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death. Although durable local control rates are high after surgical resection or definitive radiotherapy for early-stage disease, a substantial proportion of these patients eventually experience regional and/or distant failure and succumb to their metastatic disease. The discovery of immunotherapeutics and targeted biologics has revolutionized the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic disease, improving progression-free and overall survival when incorporated with the current standards of care. Notably, post-hoc analyses and early clinical trials provide a growing body of evidence to support a synergistic effect between radiation and immunotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC from early-stage to metastatic disease. Radiotherapy appears to be capable of not only potentiating the effect of immunotherapy in targeted lesions, but also eliciting an antitumor response in distant lesions without any direct exposure to radiation. This review explores the biologic basis of immunotherapy, targeted biologics, and radiotherapy as well as the preclinical and clinical data that support the combined use of radioimmunotherapy for early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic NSCLC.

scholarly journals Multimodality Therapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Almquist ◽  
Kailash Mosalpuria ◽  
Apar Kishor Ganti
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Combined Modality Therapy ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Limited Stage

Limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) occurs in only one third of patients with SCLC, but it is potentially curable. Combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) has long been the mainstay of therapy for this condition, but more recent data suggest a role for surgery in early-stage disease. Prophylactic cranial irradiation seems to improve outcomes in patients who have responded to initial therapy. This review addresses the practical aspects of staging and treatment of patients with limited-stage SCLC.

scholarly journals Association between time-to-treatment and outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Thorax ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. thoraxjnl-2021-216865
Author(s):  
Helen Hall ◽  
Adam Tocock ◽  
Sarah Burdett ◽  
David Fisher ◽  
William M Ricketts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Stage Disease

BackgroundNational targets for timely diagnosis and management of a potential cancer are driven in part by the perceived risk of disease progression during avoidable delays. However, it is unclear to what extent time-to-treatment impacts prognosis for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with previous reviews reporting mixed or apparently paradoxical associations. This systematic review focuses on potential confounders in order to identify particular patient groups which may benefit most from timely delivery of care.MethodsMedline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for publications between January 2012 and October 2020, correlating timeliness in secondary care pathways to patient outcomes. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; ID 99239). Prespecified factors (demographics, performance status, histology, stage and treatment) are examined through narrative synthesis.ResultsThirty-seven articles were included. All but two were observational. Timely care was generally associated with a worse prognosis in those with advanced stage disease (6/8 studies) but with better outcomes for patients with early-stage disease treated surgically (9/12 studies). In one study, patients with squamous cell carcinoma referred for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy benefited more from timely care, compared with patients with adenocarcinoma. One randomised controlled trial supported timeliness as being advantageous in those with stage I–IIIA disease.ConclusionThere are limitations to the available evidence, but observed trends suggest timeliness to be of particular importance in surgical candidates. In more advanced disease, survival trends are likely outweighed by symptom burden, performance status or clinical urgency dictating timeliness of treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document