scholarly journals Is Carboxypeptidase B1 a Prognostic Marker for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1726
Author(s):  
Charu Kothari ◽  
Alisson Clemenceau ◽  
Geneviève Ouellette ◽  
Kaoutar Ennour-Idrissi ◽  
Annick Michaud ◽  
...  

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a non-obligatory precursor for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Around 70% of women with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) undergo unnecessary surgery due to the difficulty in differentiating ADH from low-grade DCIS. If untreated, 14–60% of DCIS progress to IDC, highlighting the importance of identifying a DCIS gene signature. Human transcriptome data of breast tissue samples representing each step of BC progression were analyzed and high expression of carboxypeptidase B1 (CPB1) expression strongly correlated with DCIS. This was confirmed by quantitative PCR in breast tissue samples and cell lines model. High CPB1 expression correlated with better survival outcome, and mRNA level was highest in DCIS than DCIS adjacent to IDC and IDC. Moreover, loss of CPB1 in a DCIS cell line led to invasive properties associated with activation of HIF1α, FN1, STAT3 and SPP1 and downregulation of SFRP1 and OS9. The expression of CPB1 could predict 90.1% of DCIS in a cohort consisting of DCIS and IDC. We identified CPB1, a biomarker that helps differentiate DCIS from ADH or IDC and in predicting if a DCIS is likely to progress to IDC, thereby helping clinicians in their decisions.

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-66
Author(s):  
Jose M. Carnate

This is the case of a 44-year-old woman with a one-year history of a left pre-auricular mass. The surgical specimen is a 5 centimeter diameter tan-brown irregularly-shaped tissue whose cut surfaces are brown with cystic spaces. Microscopic sections show cystic and dilated ductal spaces lined by cells forming irregular, variably-sized secondary spaces. These spaces are arranged in a cribriform pattern that is reminiscent of breast ductal hyperplasia. (Figure 1) The ductal cells lining the spaces are small, multilayered, and generally bland. The superficial cells show apocrine-type cytoplasmic snouting. There is no significant nuclear atypia or mitotic activity noted. Necrosis is also absent. (Figure 2) Based on these features, we signed the case as a low-grade cribriform cyastadenocarcinoma (LGCCC).   LGCCC is an uncommon tumor presenting primarily as cystic parotid masses in elderly females. The histologic hallmark of this tumor is its morphologic resemblance to the spectrum of breast lesions ranging from ductal hyperplasia to low-grade ductal carcinoma-in-situ.1-4               Microscopic sections show an unencapsulated tumor consisting of single or multiple cysts lined by proliferated small and bland ductal cells with fine chromatin and small nucleoli. Within the cystic spaces, the cells are often arranged in a cribriform pattern with anastomosing intracystic micropapillae lining the cavity. Many superficial cells show apocrine-type secretions. Thus, the over-all appearance is quite comparable to breast lesions that are termed atypical ductal hyperplasia and low-grade ductal carcinoma-in-situ.1-4 Focal invasion into the surrounding tissue can be seen. Perineural or vascular invasion however is typically absent. Cellular pleomorphism and mitoses are also usually absent and necrosis is rare. Occasional tumors however may demonstrate a transition to an intermediate or high-grade cytology with the appearance of scattered mitoses and focal necrosis.1,2               This tumor needs to be distinguished from a conventional cystadenocarcinoma. The latter is a more frankly invasive tumor with smaller duct-like structures that infiltrate into the salivary parenchyma and surrounding connective tissue. A papillary-cystic variant of acinic cell carcinoma will have areas of acinar differentiation and a greater degree of epithelial proliferation.1,5 A high-grade salivary duct carcinoma will have a high-grade cytology with more frequent necrosis, mitoses, and pleomorphism.6 Special stains that help in the differential diagnosis include Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) stain with Diastase digestion (diastase-resistant cytoplasmic granules in an acinic cell carcinoma), and S100 (strong diffuse positivity in LGCCC).1               LGCCC is treated by complete surgical excision. Although there are only a few reported cases with follow-up, to our knowledge, none, to date, have recurred.1-4              


2011 ◽  
Vol 135 (6) ◽  
pp. 766-769
Author(s):  
Scott Lauer ◽  
Gabriela Oprea-Ilies ◽  
Cynthia Cohen ◽  
Volkan Adsay ◽  
Amy L. Adams

Abstract Context.—Recently we have observed distinctive acidophilic intranuclear inclusions in cases of usual intraductal hyperplasia of the breast. Similar inclusions were described almost 20 years ago in cases of mammary hyperplasia. These correlated ultrastructurally with so-called helioid inclusions. However, there since has been little discussion of these inclusions in the literature. Objective.—To examine the incidence and specificity of these inclusions in proliferative lesions of the breast. Design.—Forty cases of usual intraductal hyperplasia, 15 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia, and 34 cases of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ were examined for the presence of acidophilic intranuclear inclusions. Results.—Acidophilic intranuclear inclusions were present in 50% of cases of usual intraductal hyperplasia (20 of 40) but were not identified in any cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia (0 of 15) or low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (0 of 34). Conclusions.—Acidophilic intranuclear inclusions appear to be a common, specific feature found in usual intraductal hyperplasia and may be helpful in distinguishing it from atypical ductal hyperplasia and low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ in some cases. Elucidating the nature of these inclusions may provide insight into the pathogenesis of usual intraductal hyperplasia.


2021 ◽  
pp. 106689692110109
Author(s):  
Cunxian Zhang ◽  
Edmond Y. Wang ◽  
Fang Liu ◽  
M. Ruhul Quddus ◽  
C. James Sung

The literature shows a wide range in the frequencies of finding breast carcinoma in the excised specimens following a biopsy diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), likely due to a poor diagnostic reproducibility among different pathologists as well as an inherent heterogeneity in ADH. We evaluated whether histologic subtyping of ADH would help predict the risk of breast carcinoma. Our study consisted of 143 cases of ADH diagnosed by core needle biopsy and followed by excision. Of these, 54 cases (37.8%) showed carcinoma in the excised specimens (47 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ alone, 3 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma alone, and 4 cases of mixed invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ). We arbitrarily divided ADH into two subtypes: type A was considered when one or more ducts were completely replaced by low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ type cells but the lesion was <2 mm and type B was considered when one or more ducts were partially involved by low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ type cells regardless of lesion size. Type A was associated with a significantly higher frequency of breast carcinoma (63.6%) than type B (30.0%). ADH containing punctate necrosis showed a higher association of carcinoma (66.7%) compared to those without necrosis (35.1%). Within type B ADH, involvement of 3 or more foci had a higher frequency of carcinoma (50.0%) than involvement of fewer foci (26.6%). These histologic features of ADH may prove useful in predicting the likelihood of breast carcinoma and provide helpful information for patient's management.


1999 ◽  
Vol 435 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsunari Oyama ◽  
Horacio Maluf ◽  
F. Koerner

2015 ◽  
Vol 139 (9) ◽  
pp. 1137-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathleen Matrai ◽  
Timothy M. D'Alfonso ◽  
Lindsay Pharmer ◽  
Michele B. Drotman ◽  
Rache M. Simmons ◽  
...  

Context Radial scars are benign sclerosing lesions that are routinely excised when diagnosed in a needle core biopsy. Optimal management for patients with incidental and small (≤5 mm) radial scars is uncertain. Objective To assess pathologic upgrade of radial scars diagnosed in needle core biopsy samples and identify a subset of patients who could benefit from conservative management. Design Patients with a diagnosis of radial scar in a needle core biopsy who underwent excision of the biopsied area were identified. Radial scars greater than 5 mm in size and those with coexisting atypia, carcinoma, and papillary lesions were excluded. After histologic-radiographic correlation, rates of pathologic upgrade were assessed. Results Seventy-seven radial scars diagnosed in 66 patients were included. Overall, 9 of 77 (12%) showed upgrade to a high-risk lesion (6 lobular carcinoma in situ, 2 atypical ductal hyperplasia, 1 atypical lobular hyperplasia), while none (0%) showed upgrade to invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. One of 22 incidental radial scars (4.5%) showed upgrade on excision versus 6 of 36 (16.7%) for radial scars considered to be the radiographic target (P = .23). Older age was associated with upgrade (P &lt; .001). Conclusions No incidental or small (≤5 mm) radial scars excised revealed invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ on excision. Provided there is good pathologic-radiologic concordance, it appears reasonable for these patients to be managed conservatively.


Breast Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-391
Author(s):  
Benedict Krischer ◽  
Serafino Forte ◽  
Gad Singer ◽  
Rahel A. Kubik-Huch ◽  
Cornelia Leo

Purpose: The question of overtreatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was raised because a significant proportion of especially low-grade DCIS lesions never progress to invasive cancer. The rationale for the present study was to analyze the value of stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) for complete removal of DCIS, focusing on the relationship between the absence of residual microcalcifications after stereotactic VAB and the histopathological diagnosis of the definitive surgical specimen. Patients and Methods: Data of 58 consecutive patients diagnosed with DCIS by stereotactic VAB in a single breast center between 2012 and 2017 were analyzed. Patient records from the hospital information system were retrieved, and mammogram reports and images as well as histopathology reports were evaluated. The extent of microcalcifications before and after biopsy as well as the occurrence of DCIS in biopsy and definitive surgical specimens were analyzed and correlated. Results: There was no correlation between the absence of residual microcalcifications in the post-biopsy mammogram and the absence of residual DCIS in the final surgical specimen (p = 0.085). Upstaging to invasive cancer was recorded in 4 cases (13%) but occurred only in the group that had high-grade DCIS on biopsy. Low-grade DCIS was never upgraded to high-grade DCIS in the definitive specimen. Conclusions: The radiological absence of microcalcifications after stereotactic biopsy does not rule out residual DCIS in the final surgical specimen. Since upstaging to invasive cancer is seen in a substantial proportion of high-grade DCIS, the surgical excision of high-grade DCIS should remain the treatment of choice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Machado Badan ◽  
Decio Roveda Júnior ◽  
Sebastião Piato ◽  
Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury ◽  
Mário Sérgio Dantas Campos ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To determine the rates of diagnostic underestimation at stereotactic percutaneous core needle biopsies (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsies (VABB) of nonpalpable breast lesions, with histopathological results of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) subsequently submitted to surgical excision. As a secondary objective, the frequency of ADH and DCIS was determined for the cases submitted to biopsy. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 40 cases with diagnosis of ADH or DCIS on the basis of biopsies performed between February 2011 and July 2013, subsequently submitted to surgery, whose histopathological reports were available in the internal information system. Biopsy results were compared with those observed at surgery and the underestimation rate was calculated by means of specific mathematical equations. Results: The underestimation rate at CNB was 50% for ADH and 28.57% for DCIS, and at VABB it was 25% for ADH and 14.28% for DCIS. ADH represented 10.25% of all cases undergoing biopsy, whereas DCIS accounted for 23.91%. Conclusion: The diagnostic underestimation rate at CNB is two times the rate at VABB. Certainty that the target has been achieved is not the sole determining factor for a reliable diagnosis. Removal of more than 50% of the target lesion should further reduce the risk of underestimation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document