scholarly journals The Trade-offs and Synergistic Relationships between Grassland Ecosystem Functions in the Yellow River Basin

Diversity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 505
Author(s):  
Jie Yang ◽  
Baopeng Xie ◽  
Degang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Yellow River ◽  
Yellow River Basin ◽  
Ecosystem Functions ◽  
Water Yield ◽  
The Yellow River ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
The Yellow River Basin ◽  
Synergistic Relationships ◽  
Synergistic Relationship

Grassland is the most important land use/cover type in the Yellow River basin. Studying its ecosystem services and the trade-off and synergistic relationships between its various functions is of great significance to high-quality development and the protection of the ecological environment in the Yellow River basin. This paper evaluates the five typical functions of grassland in the Yellow River basin quantitatively, including water yield, carbon storage, soil conservation, habitat quality, and NPP by adopting the InVEST model and the CASA model. It analyzes changes in the trade-offs and the synergistic relationships between the five ecosystem functions from 1990 to 2018 by adopting the correlation coefficient method. The paper also analyzes and explores the spatial heterogeneity of the trade-offs and synergistic relationships by adopting the bivariate spatial autocorrelation method. The results show that from 1990 to 2018, the average water yield depth, carbon storage, and NPP of the grassland in the Yellow River basin tended to increase; soil conservation and habitat quality showed a decreasing trend; and the spatial distribution of the five functions were clearly in line with zonal law. The five ecological functions were synergistic; the synergistic relationship between water yield and the other functions was relatively weak, and there was a strong synergistic relationship between the other four functions. The trade-offs and synergistic relationships between the five functions demonstrated significant spatial heterogeneity in space. This research provides a scientific basis for determining the optimal utilization and sustainable development of grassland resources.

scholarly journals The effects of rainfall characteristics and land use and cover change on runoff in the Yellow River basin, China

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-40
Author(s):  
CaiHong Hu ◽  
Guang Ran ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
Yun Yu ◽  
Qiang Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Yellow River ◽  
Yellow River Basin ◽  
Vegetation Coverage ◽  
Water Yield ◽  
The Yellow River ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
The Yellow River Basin ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThe changes of runoff in the middle reaches of the Yellow River basin of China have received considerable attention owing to their sharply decline during recent decades. In this paper, the impacts of rainfall characteristics and land use and cover change on water yields in the Jingle sub-basin of the middle reaches of the Yellow River basin were investigated using a combination of statistical analysis and hydrological simulations. The Levenberg Marquardt and Analysis of Variance methods were used to construct multivariate, nonlinear, model equations between runoff coefficient and rainfall intensity and vegetation coverage. The land use changes from 1971 to 2017 were ascertained using transition matrix analysis. The impact of land use on water yields was estimated using the M-EIES hydrological model. The results show that the runoff during flood season (July to September) decreased significantly after 2000, whereas slightly decreasing trend was detected for precipitation. Furthermore, there were increase in short, intense, rainfall events after 2000 and this rainfall events were more conducive to flood generation. The “Grain for Green” project was carried out in 1999, and the land use in the middle reaches of the Yellow River improved significantly, which make the vegetation coverage (Vc) of the Jingle sub-basin increased by 13%. When Vc approaches 48%, the runoff coefficient decreased to the lowest, and the vegetation conditions have the greatest effect on reducing runoff. Both land use and climate can change the water yield in the basin, but for areas where land use has significantly improved, the impact of land use change on water yield plays a dominant role. The results acquired in this study provide a useful reference for water resources planning and soil and water conservation in the erodible areas of the middle reaches of the Yellow River basin.

scholarly journals Ecosystem Services Assessment, Trade-Off and Bundles in the Yellow River Basin, China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Yang ◽  
Baopeng Xie ◽  
Wenqian Tao
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Yellow River ◽  
Yellow River Basin ◽  
The Yellow River ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
The Yellow River Basin ◽  
Functional Areas

Abstract Understanding ecosystem services (ESs) and their interactions will help to formulate effective and sustainable land use management programs.This paper evaluates the water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon storage (CS) and habitat quality (HQ), taking the Yellow River Basin as the research object, by adopting the InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade Offs) model. The Net Primary Productivity (NPP) was evaluated by CASA (Carnegie-Ames-Stanford approach) model, and the spatial distribution map of five ESs were drawn, the correlation and bivariate spatial correlation were used to analyze the trade-off synergy relationships between the five ESs and express them spatially. The results show that NPP and HQ, CS and WY are trade-offs relationship, and other ecosystem services are synergistic. The trade-off synergy shows obvious spatial heterogeneity. Driven by different factors, the leading ecological function services in the Yellow River Basin can be divided into three areas, and WY and SC service leading functional areas are mainly distributed in HQ and CS service leading functional areas and NPP service leading functional areas.The results of functional bundles are obviously affected by natural conditions such as land use/cover types and climate in the Yellow River Basin, which can provide the basis for the Yellow River Basin to regulate ESs and maximize benefits.

scholarly journals Ecosystem Services Assessment, Trade-Off, and Bundles in the Yellow River Basin, China

Diversity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Jie Yang ◽  
Baopeng Xie ◽  
Wenqian Tao ◽  
Degang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Yellow River ◽  
Yellow River Basin ◽  
The Yellow River ◽  
Land Use Management ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
The Yellow River Basin ◽  
Functional Areas

Understanding ecosystem services(ESs)and their interactions will help to formulate effective and sustainable land use management plans, and clarifying the balance and synergy between watershed ecosystem services can provide a basis for the regulation of the ecological environment in different regions of the watershed and the maximization of overall ecological benefits. This paper takes the Yellow River Basin as the research object and uses the Ecosystem Services and Trade Offs (InVEST)model to evaluate the water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon storage (CS) and habitat quality (HQ) of the Yellow River Basin. The paper adopts the Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach (CASA)model to evaluate the net primary productivity (NPP), draws the spatial distribution map of the five ecosystems, analyzes the trade-off and synergy between the five ecosystems using correlation and binary spatial correlation, and expresses it in space. In addition, it adopts self-organizing mapping (SOM) method to identify ecosystem service clusters. The results show that: (1) ES is generally higher in the upper reaches of the Yellow River, and lower in the middle reaches. (2) WY and NPP, HQ, CS and WY are trade-off relationships, and other ecosystem services are synergistic relationships. Trade-offs and synergy show obvious spatial heterogeneity. (3) The ecosystem services of the Yellow River Basin, driven by different factors, can be divided into three areas, namely WY and SC service leading functional areas, HQ and CS service leading functional areas, and NPP service leading functional areas. Finally, it discusses the driving factors of the spatial heterogeneity of the balance of the ecosystem service functions of the Yellow River Basin and the suggestions of land use management in the basin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document