scholarly journals Adjunctive Effect of Green Tea Mouthwash Prepared at Different Steeping Temperatures on Gingivitis: A Triple-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 139
Author(s):  
Hani T. Fadel ◽  
Alhanouf M. AlRehaili ◽  
Mona M. AlShanqiti ◽  
Afnan A. Alraddadi ◽  
Alhanouf M. Albolowi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Dental Plaque ◽  
Hot Water ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Gingival Bleeding ◽  
Plaque Control ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: To compare the effect of green tea mouthwashes prepared at different steeping temperatures as adjuncts to mechanical plaque control on gingivitis. Methods: Forty-five women with gingivitis participated in this 4-week randomized controlled clinical trial. They received professional mechanical plaque control and rinsed daily with either warm green tea, hot–cold green tea or placebo. Dental plaque control record (PCR) and gingival bleeding indices (GBI) were recorded at baseline and 7, 14 and 28 days after. Results: Participants’ mean age was 20.7 ± 2 years. The mean scores for the PCR and GBI at baseline were 82.4 ± 19 and 85.8 ± 7, respectively. All groups showed significant reduction in PCR and GBI between Days 0 and 28 (p < 0.01). No significant differences in PCR were observed between the groups at any of the examinations (p > 0.01). The warm green tea group demonstrated significantly lower GBI at all examinations compared to the hot–cold group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Within study limits, green tea-made mouthwashes significantly reduced plaque and gingivitis when used as adjuncts to mechanical plaque control. The green tea mouthwash prepared in warm water demonstrated significantly higher efficacy in lowering gingivitis compared to that prepared in hot water followed by ice.

Comparision of two fluoride varnishes for controlling white spot lesions. Randomized clinical trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Alberto Luengo - Fereira
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
White Spot ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
White Spot Lesions ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
The Mean

Objective: To compare two fluorinated varnishes for the control of white spot lesions.Material and Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. A total of 103 active whitespot lesions on permanent upper anterior teeth from 24 patients, aged 7 to 9 years were randomly assigned totwo groups, G1: Duraphat® (n=52) and G2: DuraShield® (n=51). Weekly applications were perform for fourconsecutive weeks. Fifth week the dimension, regression and activity of the lesions were evaluated. Student’sT test, Wilcoxon Ranks and Chi square were used at 5% significance. Results: At the end of the study, the lesion reduction was observed in 69.7%, finding significant differences(p<0.05) in the mean of the initial and final dimensions in general (2.74 mm to 1.91 mm) and in each group, G1(2.84 mm to 2.03 mm), G2 (2.64 mm to 1.78 mm). In the activity of the lesions, it was found in the G1, 12 active and6 inactive lesions; while in G2, there were 14 active and 29 inactive; these differences were significant (p<0.05). Conclusions: The two evaluated products showed similar clinical efficacy in the remineralization of activewhite spot lesions after 4 weeks of therapy.

scholarly journals The Effect of Rhythmic Breathing on the Severity of Sternotomy Pain after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Hassan Babamohamadi ◽  
Masoumeh Karkeabadi ◽  
Abbasali Ebrahimian
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Artery Bypass Graft ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

Background. Moderate-to-severe pain is reported in up to 75% of the patients in the first 48 hours after cardiac surgery. Evidence suggests that distraction is an effective nursing intervention for controlling short-term and transient pain. Distraction can be achieved by various techniques, including progressive muscle relaxation, meditation, and rhythmic breathing (RB). The present research aimed at evaluating the impacts of RB on the severity of sternotomy pain after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). Methods. This randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients after CABG surgery at the open-heart surgery Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Kowsar Hospital, affiliated to Semnan University of Medical Sciences in Semnan, Iran. The patients were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to two groups, including (1) intervention or RB and (2) control groups. RB was performed in the intervention group every 12 hours (9 a.m. and 9 p.m.) for three consecutive days after the surgery. The control group received only routine care for pain control (opioid analgesics) with no additional interventions. The severity of pain was measured every day in both groups of patients before and after the interventions using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results. The mean postintervention pain scores were significantly different from the mean preintervention scores in the intervention group ( p  < 0.05). The changes in the mean pain score in the intervention group were also significantly different from the corresponding changes in the controls ( p  < 0.05). Conclusion. Based on the results, the severity of pain after the intervention was significantly lower in the RB group compared to the control. RB was found to be an effective technique for reducing the patients’ pain and is therefore recommended as a post-CABG pain control technique. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: this trial is clinically registered with IRCT20120109008665N7, registered 3 September 2018.

Effect of aloe vera mouthwash on dental plaque and gingivitis indices in children: A randomized controlled clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Doaa Mhd Adnan Alnouri ◽  
Chaza Kouchaji ◽  
Abdul Hakim Nattouf ◽  
Mohammad Moaffak A. AlSayed Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dental Plaque ◽  
Aloe Vera ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled

A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Four Anti-Dandruff Shampoos

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Rapaport
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Test Preparation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Rate Of Improvement

A total of 199 patients were selected for a comparison of the anti-dandruff efficacy of four shampoos. After a 2-week lead-in (all patients used only Johnson's Baby Shampoo twice weekly) the patients were randomly assigned to Selsun Blue®, Head & Shoulders®, Flex®, or Tegrin®. The test preparation, which was unknown to the observer, was used twice weekly for 4 weeks. Loose and adherent dandruff were each rated on a scale of 0 to 20 (absent to severe) at the end of the lead-in (when a total score of 15 was required), and each week of study. The mean total pre-study score for all subjects was 19.5. At the end of the study the mean improvement scores were: 162 (Selsun Blue), 14.6 (Head & Shoulders), 13.5 (Flex), and 13.1 (Tegrin). The improvement was significantly greater (p < 0.05) on Selsun Blue than on any of the other shampoos. At the end of the study significantly (p < 0.05) more patients had total scores of zero on Selsun Blue (15) than on Tegrin or Head & Shoulders. In addition, the rate of improvement was significantly (p < 0.05) faster with Selsun Blue than with any of the other test preparations.

scholarly journals Comparison of Complications and Safety of Hemorrhoidectomy with Ligasureand Hemorrhoidectomy with Ferguson: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 50-56
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
The Mean ◽  
And Control

Introduction: Hemorrhoid is one of the most common anorectal diseases which affects 5% of the general population. Complications and pain are inevitable after all surgeries with different intensities and degrees.Management and control of these complications is one of the most important aspects of postoperative care. There are surgical techniques and interventions for the treatment and control of pain after hemorrhoid. According to the contradictory results of the studies on surgical methods, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness, complications, and safety of hemorrhoidectomy with Ligasureand Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Methods: The study sample in this randomized controlled clinical trial studyincluded54 patientswhowere randomly divided into two groupsofLigasureandFerguson surgery. Prior to the surgery, patients were educated abouttheVisual Analogue Scale(VAS).Patients underwent general anesthesia and the same surgeon performed the surgery in both groups. Immediately after the surgery (oncethe patient regainedconsciousness and understoodthe environment), 6, 12, and 24 hours after the surgery, patients’ pain and complications were assessed.The collected data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 18)through independent t-test, Mann-Whitney, Friedman, Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test at a significance level of α=0.05. Results: The mean bleeding during the surgery was significantly lower in the Ligasuregroupthan the Ferguson group. The mean pain at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hafterthe surgery was not significantly different between the two groups.Postoperative complications were significantly higher in the Ligasuregroup than the Ferguson group. Conclusion: Ligasurehemorrhoidectomy is not superior to the Ferguson method in terms of analgesia up to 24 h after the surgery; however, this method of surgeryis preferable to the Ferguson method in terms of bleeding during the surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document